Main content
Microeconomics
Course: Microeconomics > Unit 2
Lesson 1: Demand- Law of demand
- Law of demand
- Market demand as the sum of individual demand
- Substitution and income effects and the law of demand
- Price of related products and demand
- Change in expected future prices and demand
- Changes in income, population, or preferences
- Normal and inferior goods
- Inferior goods clarification
- What factors change demand?
- Lesson summary: Demand and the determinants of demand
- Demand and the law of demand
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Price of related products and demand
Changes in the prices of related products (either substitutes or complements) can affect the demand curve for a particular product.The example of an ebook illustrates how the demand curve can shift to the left or right depending on whether the prices of related products go up or down. Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- So let me get this straight: substitutes are similar products that can be substituted for yours, and complements are products that work together somehow?(41 votes)
- Yes, exactly.
Substitutes: Coke and Pepsi, or Chrome and Firefox.
Complements: Bacon and eggs, or left shoes and right shoes.(88 votes)
- what is ceteris paribus(5 votes)
- The term "ceteris paribus" is a Latin phrase meaning "everything else equal." Ceteris means "everything else." People use that term all the time without thinking about it when they're making a list and conclude it with et cetera (etc. -- and everything else"). Paribus, in Latin, means "equal." That's where we get the term "par."
When economists construct a model, they take a real life situation and make it as simple as possible by ignoring certain variables that might actually affect the situation. There are too many variables to consider in most real life situations to make it completely understandable. We wouldn't be able to identify all the variables, and even if we could, we could not determine the precise degree by which they would affect the dependent variable. So we ignore them by assuming that they don't change -- ceteris paribus.
For example, the law of demand says that when the price of something goes up, the quantity demanded will go down. But, it could be that that at the very moment the price of something went up, a consumer's income went up, plus he liked the item much more than he did the moment before, plus the price of a substitute went up at that very moment. The result could very well be that when the price of the item went up, the quantity demanded would actually go up. But when you consider the income effect and the substitution effect, that would make no sense. Thus, the law of demand actually states: When the price of an item goes up, the quantity demanded goes down, CETERIS PARIBUS. That is, the quantity demanded will go down if ALL THOSE OTHER THINGS REMAINED THE SAME.(36 votes)
- confused with how price of one changes demand in another and not quantity demanded.
i thought, from the previous video, that increase/decrease in price correlated to an increase/decrease in the QUANTITY DEMANDED, not demand.
so take the following example,
an increase in the price of Coke causes an increase in the demand for Pepsi.
Why is it demand for Pepsi and not quantity demanded? I mean we're talking about price right?(6 votes)- So the price of Coke increases...now more consumers will be more interested in buying Pepsi at all possible prices. If you picture a demand schedule for Pepsi, with P and Q, then Q increases at every corresponding P, resulting in a whole new demand curve for Pepsi.(13 votes)
- Maybe I'm a little bit early to ask such a question and I will see the answer on classes to come, but how can I measure the "strength" that a piece of information (e.g.: "Hurricane 'X' will hit the coast.") on the Demand of items such as Water, Food, Flashlights, etc.
- Is it possible to make an accurate estimate?
- And for such an estimate to be made, what should i base myself on? Maybe, do research prices/quantity demanded that were practiced in the past when Hurricanes ocurred and do something like an arithmetic mean?(7 votes)- The short answer is yes. What you are describing is something that actuaries do. Actuaries are mathematicians that calculate the probability of events so as to guide companies who have financial stakes in events tied to probability. They are indispensable to the insurance industry and are quite well paid. To learn more about Actuaries try these websites:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuary
http://www.bls.gov/ooh/Math/Actuaries.htm(7 votes)
- What about things like apples and oranges? How do you determine how many people, if the price of apples goes up, would treat oranges as a substitue and how many will treat it like a complement?(4 votes)
- That is why there are a lot of assumptions should be done when you are giving an example. It is more common that people assume use oranges is a substitute for apples.(6 votes)
- what does moving along demand curve depicts?(3 votes)
- Moving along the demand curve (changing from one point on the demand curve to another point on the demand curve) depicts a change only in quantity demanded. For a different price, there will be a different quantity demanded value associated with that price. Sal made it clear towards the end of the video that moving along the demand curve represents a change in quantity demanded (all outside factors remain constant "ceteris paribus," but a shift in or warping of the demand curve means that there was a change in demand and that some outside factor was changed (for example, the price of e-book readers increased.)(5 votes)
- Do price changes in complementary goods affect each other bidirectional or can there be examples of a unidirectional effect of a complementary good? I read an example about the change in demand in response to price increases of beer with pizza as a complementary good. A price increase in beer shifts demand of beer and pizza to the left. And vice versa a price increase in pizza shifts demand of beer and pizza to the left (bidirectional). Is it also possible that this effect only happens in one direction and are these still called complementary goods in this case? e.g. only when pizza price increases a shift in demand of pizza as well as beer occurs, but an increase of beer price doesn't affect pizza demand.
Thanks for clarifying.(4 votes)- I can't think of any examples that perfectly fits what you are asking, but I would argue that most complementary goods have both of the effects you are describing. If we go back to the example of pizza and beer, we see that if the price of pizza rises, the demand for beer will decrease. But, the price change will not affect the beer market as much as it will affect the pizza market. This all ties back to elasticity, specifically cross elasticity of demand. Check out the video below for more information.
https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/microeconomics/elasticity-tutorial/price-elasticity-tutorial/v/cross-elasticity-of-demand(2 votes)
- What other examples are similar to this one as related products?(2 votes)
- The example of a car is one that comes to mind. If the price of gasoline increased, it would cause more people to ride (for example) public transportation. Therefore, the "Demand" as a whole would decrease for a car.(5 votes)
- For the Kindle example, could you think of it as if the Kindle has it's own graph? So if Kindle prices increase, the quantity demanded for a Kindle decreases and that translates to an ENITRE demand for ebooks decreasing since Kindles complement ebooks so a change in quantity demanded for Kindles means a change in the number of people having Kindles which changes the entire demand curve for ebooks since all price ranges for the ebooks will be effected. Is that a valid way of explaining it?(3 votes)
- Yes. Only one minor edit -- "which changes the entire demand curve for ebooks since all price ranges for the ebooks will be effected". The demand curve for ebooks shifts to the left because of the change in the price of the Kindle and not the price of the ebooks. The price change for ebooks is a result of the demand shift and not the cause of the demand shift.(3 votes)
- This is the first time that I have been exposed to this kind of learning. Is there some kind of question and answer to test what is being learned. I f so where is it found. I'm excited about proving that I am comprehending all this newly learned information.(4 votes)
Video transcript
We've talked a little bit
about the law of demand which tells us all else equal, if we
raise the price of a product, then the quantity demanded
for that product will go down. Common sense. If we lower the price, than the
quantity demanded will go up, and we'll see a few
special cases for this. But what I want to do
in this video is focus on these other things that
we've been holding equal, the things that allow us to
make this statement, that allow us to move
along this curve, and think about if we were to
change one of those things, that we were
otherwise considering equal, how does that
change the actual curve? How does that actually
change the whole quantity demanded price relationship? And so the first of these
that I will focus on, the first is the price
of competing products. So if you assume that
the price of-- actually I shouldn't say
competing products, I'll say the price
of related products, because we'll see that
they're not competing. The price of related
products is one of the things that we're assuming is constant
when we, it's beheld equal when we show this relationship. We're assuming that these
other things aren't changing. Now, what would happen
if these things changed? Well, imagine we have,
say, other ebooks-- books is price-- price goes up. The price of other ebooks go up. So what will that
do to our price quantity demanded relationship? If other ebooks prices go up,
now all of a sudden, my ebook, regardless of what
price point we're at, at any of the price
points, my ebook is going to look more desirable. At $2, it's more likely
that people will want it, because the other
stuff's more expensive. At $4 more people will want it,
at $6 more people will want it, $8 more people will want it, at
$10 more people will want it. So if this were to happen,
that would actually shift the entire demand
curve to the right. So it would start to
look something like this. That is scenario one. And these other ebooks,
we can call them substitutes for my product. So this right over here,
these other ebooks, these are substitutes. People might say, oh, you
know, that other book looks kind of comparable, if
one is more expensive or one is cheaper, maybe
I'll read one or the other. So in order to make
this statement, in order to stay along this
curve, we have to assume that this
thing is constant. If this thing changes, this
is going to move the curve. If other ebooks
prices go up, it'll probably shift our
curve to the right. If other ebooks
prices go down, that will shift our entire
curve to the left. So this is actually
changing our demand. It's changing our
whole relationship. So it's shifting
demand to the right. So let me write that. So this is going
to shift demand. So the entire relationship,
demand, to the right. I really want to make sure
that you have this point clear. When we hold
everything else equal, we're moving along a
given demand curve. We're essentially saying
the demand, the price quantity demanded
relationship, is held constant, and we can pick
a price and we'll get a certain quantity demanded. We're moving along the curve. If we change one
of those things, we might actually
shift the curve. We'll actually change
this demand schedule, which will change this curve. Now, there other
related products, they don't just have
to be substitutes. So, for example, let's
think about scenario two. Or maybe the price
of a Kindle goes up. Let me write this this way. Kindle's price goes up. Now, the Kindle is
not a substitute. People don't either buy an
ebook or they won't either buy my ebook or a Kindle. Kindle is a compliment. You actually need a Kindle or
an iPad or something like it in order to consume my ebook. So this right over
here is a complement. So if a complement's price
becomes more expensive, and this is one of
the things people might use to buy my book,
then it would actually, for any given price, lower
the quantity demanded. So in this situation,
if my book is $2, since fewer people
are going to have Kindles, or since maybe they
used some of their money already to buy the
Kindle, they're going to have less to
buy my book or just fewer people will have the Kindle,
for any given price is going to lower the quantity demanded. And so it'll
essentially will shift, it'll change the entire demand
curve will shift the demand curve to the left. So this right over
here is scenario two. And you could imagine
the other way, if the Kindle's
price went down, then that would shift my
demand curve to the right. If the price of
substitutes went down, then that would shift my
entire curve to the left. So you can think about
all the scenarios, and actually I encourage you to. Think about drawing yourself,
think about for products, that could be an ebook or could
be some other type of product, and think about
what would happen. Well, one, think about what
the related products are, the substitutes and potentially
complements, and then think about what happen
as those prices change. And always keep in mind the
difference between demand, which is this entire
relationship, the entire curve that we can move along if we
hold everything else equal and only change price,
and quantity demanded, which is a particular quantity
for our particular price holding everything else equal.