Crossing the Line: vocabulary; Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Sports 8

Are Performance-Enhancing Drugs Really the Enemy?

1. The term “performance-enhancing drugs” (PEDs) refers to illicit drugs that help an athlete improve their athletic performance or physical condition. They are a major topic of debate in professional sports. Athletes like tennis star Maria Sharapova, soccer player Diego Maradona, and cyclist Lance Armstrong have all been caught using illegal performance enhancers. Those who use these drugs face suspensions, lifetime bans from a sport, or even prison sentences.
2. Some claim that these drugs provide an unfair advantage to users. They allow elite athletes who are willing to take the risk of

   doping

   to soar to heights where athletes who obey the rules can’t follow. Those who have truly examined all sides of the issue, however, argue that banning PEDs is inconsistent, ineffective, and unfair.
3. If the term “performance-enhancing drugs” described a clear, unambiguous group of substances, the laws governing these pharmaceuticals would be much clearer. However, choosing which drugs to ban is a subjective matter. Caffeine supplements provide a burst of quick energy and are completely legal. However, the health risks include high blood pressure, dizziness, and reduction in calcium absorption. Methamphetamines, which have many of the same side effects, can mean a one-way ticket to prison. Human growth hormone (hGH), which aids in injury recovery, is a banned substance. Creatine, which can cause kidney damage, liver damage, and many other harmful side effects, is not.
4. In addition to being unclear, laws against PEDs are ineffective. We see this in the number of athletes banned from their sports every year for doping. Despite intensified efforts to catch and punish athletes who use banned substances, doping cases show no sign of going away. The World Anti-Doping Agency reported 1,804 cases of doping in 2017. This was a 13% increase from the year before.

5. Finally, banning PEDs causes inequitable standards for athletes. It is impossible to test every professional athlete for possible drug usage. In fact, only those with the greatest innate skills are likely to be tested. Swimming superstar Michael Phelps was tested for drug use thirteen times prior to the Rio Olympics. Other, less-talented swimmers were not tested at all. Legalizing PEDs would put all athletes on a level playing field, rather than giving an unfair advantage to those willing to break the rules.
6. Many will argue that legalizing performance-enhancing drugs risks the health and well-being of athletes. Ultimately, though, all sports are a risk. Do PEDs carry a legitimate health risk? Absolutely. So do concussions, a major danger in all contact sports. Concussions can cause long-term brain damage, and spinal injuries can result in paralysis. Players have broken bones during soccer games, torn ligaments playing tennis, and sustained a huge variety of injuries during boxing or wrestling matches. Athletes willingly accept these risks. These are adults who have committed themselves to athletic excellence. It should be their choice to accept or refuse the possible dangers and advantages of PEDs.
7. Professional athletes inspire fans by showing what the human body can accomplish. It’s time we allowed them to perform at the highest level possible instead of setting unclear, unrealistic limits on how they can achieve their potential.

Practice questions

Part A

Part B