The English colonies in North America had a complex relationship with their mother country, Britain. They shared cultural, political, and economic ties, but also developed a sense of independence due to Britain's neglect. This led to mixed feelings, which eventually sparked the American Revolution.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why would the government ignore their people?(5 votes)
- There's a Chinese saying, "Heaven is high and the emperor is far away" It is used by people who disregard rules, because the power to enforce rules seems to have little influence where rules are ignored. In a similar way, those British subjects who went to North America, across the Atlantic Ocean, were far away. Ships took a LONG time to go from one side to the other. They had left the near and immediate control of the crown, and little could be done for them. So unless something ABOUT them had an influence on what was happening in the British Isles, they could easily be ignored.(11 votes)
- why the english settlements began haphazardly popping up?i fully didn't understand(4 votes)
- Navigation wasn't all that good in uncharted waters. People who had been onboard small ships for months to get across the North Atlantic wanted to settle wherever they came to land. Weather could damage ships, making them unsafe to continue journeying when people could be on land.(3 votes)
- why did the government keep changing hands?(3 votes)
- At4:24Kim mentions enlightenment sort of united Great Britain, how did enlightenment divide them?(2 votes)
- The enlightenment supported liberty and revolutions. That gave the colonies some ideas that led to the revolutionary war.(3 votes)
- My Khan Academy keeps on saying on my mother's screen that my assignments aren't done but I did them, what's going on?(2 votes)
- why did the people from England come to Jamestown instead of going to the south where the Spanish are at the time(2 votes)
- England was a rising empire. Spain was the world's most powerful empire at the time. For English people to "go over to the Spanish side" would be considered treasonous.(2 votes)
- How difficult was it to develop an American colony?(2 votes)
- Why did the monarchs ignore their colonies? That just invites rebellion.(2 votes)
- The English monarchs during this time period were engaged in internal conflict in Britain. The lineage of English monarchs was interrupted by the English Civil War, and religious tensions with the Anglican Church also distracted the monarchs from the American colonies.(2 votes)
- why was mercantilism so popular(2 votes)
- It was a great money-earner for the ruling classes. It wasn't popular, more a case of it was the only game in town, and it was controlled by the people in power.(2 votes)
- At5:24and5:38, she said slavery was central to the 13 colonies, but didn't Pennsylvania have hardly any slaves because it was run by people who didn't like it, and there were mostly family farms? Or was that only when William Penn was running it?(2 votes)
- Well, Pennslyvania didn't have the proper soil for agriculture, so they weren't many slaves since manily plantations used slaves, so it had few slaves during all of its history.(2 votes)
- [Instructor] The first long-term English colony in North America was established at Jamestown in 1607. No one expected that it would last very long. It was intended to be a get rich quick scheme for its investors, who hoped they would find gold in the swamps of Virginia. They didn't, but they did find that they could grow a valuable cash crop in tobacco. Over the next century more and more English settlements began haphazardly popping up along the Atlantic seaboard of North America. Some founded as religious refuges, some as proprietary colonies, some as joint stock companies. Compared to the Spanish Empire in the New World, which had clear goals and unified colonial systems, the English Empire was pretty disorganized. Internal strife like the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, meant that the government kept changing hands, and some monarchs took a more hands on approach towards the colonies than others. This benign neglect of the American colonies left them to develop self-government and a sense of independence. But even in the early 1770s most American colonist thought of themselves as English citizens who were part of the British Empire. They read the same books, spoke the same language, drank the same tea, and fought the same enemies as their counterparts on the British Isles. Nevertheless, there was something clearly different about the 13 colonies in North America. After all, there were more than 30 British colonies in the Caribbean and North America by 1776. So why did those 13 in particular unite and rebel? So that leaves us with a question. During this period of colonial development, how British were the American colonists? What aspects of society brought them closer with the mother country, and what aspects brought on resistance to Britain's control? Let's take a look at the major political, social and economic exchanges that took place between the British Empire and the 13 colonies, and compare whether they either brought the colonies in the mother country closer together or created resentment that drove them further apart. Okay, first let's look at the political exchanges between the colonies and England. One thing that they shared was a political culture. A shared sense that all citizens, both at home and in the colonies, enjoyed the rights of Englishmen. So I would say that the political culture that the colonies, and later the United States, inherited from England was a factor that united them with Empire. But because the colonies were far away from the mother country and because the mother country was often too distracted by its own problems to take an active role in managing them, the colonies also developed their own local representative governments. This led to a tradition of self-rule and self-taxation, and the colonists were irate any time the British colonial governors attempted to interfere with their representative bodies. So I would say this tended to divide the colonies from England. What else happened politically? Well, during this time period there was also a lot of warfare against competing colonial powers in North America, particularly France and Spain, who were supported by Native American allies. For the colonists warfare against a common enemy strengthened their sense that they belonged to the British Empire. But they also felt frustrated when they didn't receive enough help defending their settlements or when British regulars insulted their colonial militias. So these conflicts were probably both a source of unity and division between the colonists and the British Government. Next, let's look at some of the social and cultural exchanges that happened between the colonies and England during this period. A big area of cultural exchange was in religion. America became the destination of choice for religious dissenters since most of the colonies were fairly tolerant of a broad range of religions. The established Church of England was pretty weak in the colonies. So religion in general didn't tie the colonies together with the mother country. But in the early 1700s both England and the colonies experienced a shared religious revival with the Great Awakening. One of the most popular preachers throughout the colonies was the English parson George Whitefield. So we might put religion down as something that both united and divided the colonies from Great Britain. Another shared cultural experience was the Enlightenment, which spread ideas about reason and self-government through books and pamphlets that were read all over the Atlantic world. Ben Franklin, the American printer and scientist, was as famous in England as he was in the colonies. So the shared ideas of the Enlightenment brought the Empire together, at least at this point. Another aspect of cultural exchange was fashion and consumer goods. The elite American colonists dressed like the English gentry, built homes in the English style, imported luxury goods from England, and drank tea like the fashionable British. So these cultural exchanges definitely were a force uniting the colonies with the mother country. Last, let's examine economic exchanges. One thing that the colonies had in common with the rest of the British Empire was their dependence on slave labor to produce cash crops. British investors and the owners of slave ships and plantations in the Caribbean were deeply involved in the system of slavery. And so were the 13 American colonies, which produced food for enslaved laborers, turned slave produced molasses into rum, and shipped enslaved people across the Atlantic, not to mention the American slave owners in the South. Slavery was central to the united economic prosperity of the British Empire. Another central aspect of the British Empire's economy was mercantilism, an economic philosophy that championed using colonies as sources of raw materials and as markets for finished goods. Mercantilism both helped and hindered the American colonies by making sure that their raw materials got preferential treatment in England, but also by preventing them from developing industries of their own. So I would say that mercantilism both united and divided the colonies from the Empire. Along with mercantilism came the Navigation Acts, a series of laws passed by Parliament that attempted to prevent the American colonies from trading with other countries. Basically a way to enforce that the benefits of mercantilism went to England alone. But there were two major problems with the Navigation Acts. First, the British Government rarely enforced them, especially when it was occupied with other matters. The other problem was that even when efforts were made to enforce the Navigation Acts, American merchants responded by smuggling and bribing officials, not by obeying the law. So the Navigation Acts worked to divide the colonies from the Empire, both because they didn't work and because they hampered American's belief in free trade. Taking a look at these three categories as a whole, you can see that the colonists had mixed feelings about their role in the British Empire. In terms of social and cultural exchanges it seems like the colonies were tied into a greater world of ideas that spanned across the Atlantic. But both politically and economically there were developments that bonded the colonies closer together with Great Britain and developments that had the colonies tugging at their leashes and trying to run free. These mixed feelings might help to explain why in 1754 the colonies had not yet pursued their independence. But are there some things that I've identified here as promoting unity that might not be so unifying by 1776? What changed between this point and the signing of the Declaration of Independence that pushed the colonists off the fence and into revolution?