If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

A beginner's guide to Romanesque art

By Dr. Andreas Petzold
San Miniato al Monte, Florence, begun 1013 (photo: Rufus46, CC BY-SA 3.0)

The first international style since antiquity

The term "Romanesque," meaning in the manner of the Romans, was first coined in the early nineteenth century. Today it is used to refer to the period of European art from the second half of the eleventh century throughout the twelfth (with the exception of the region around Paris where the Gothic style emerged in the mid-twelfth century). In certain regions, such as central Italy, the Romanesque continued to survive into the thirteenth century. The Romanesque is the first international style in Western Europe since antiquity—extending across the Mediterranean and as far north as Scandinavia. The transmission of ideas was facilitated by increased travel along the pilgrimage routes to shrines such as Santiago de Compostela in Spain (a pilgrimage is a journey to a sacred place) or as a consequence of the crusades which passed through the territories of the Byzantine empire. There are, however, distinctive regional variants—Tuscan Romanesque art (in Italy) for example is very different from that produced in northern Europe.
Master of Taüll, apse painting, Sant Clement in Taüll, c. 1123 (Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya, Barcelona)

Painting + sculpture + architecture

The relation of art to architecture—especially church architecture—is fundamental in this period. For example, wall-paintings may follow the curvature of the
of a church as in the apse wall-painting from the church of Sant Climent in Taüll (also known as Saint Clement), and the most important art form to emerge at this period was architectural sculpture—with sculpture used to decorate churches built of stone.
Last Judgment Tympanum, c. 1130–46, Central Portal, West Façade, Cathedral of St. Lazare, Autun, France (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Many sculptors may have begun their career as stone masons, and there is a remarkable coherence between architecture and sculpture in churches at this period. The two most important sculptural forms to emerge at this time were the tympanum (the lunette-shaped space above the entrance to a church), and the historiated capital (a capital incorporating a narrative element usually an episode from the Bible or the life of a saint). One of the most famous tympanums is on the west entrance to Autun Cathedral which represents—appropriately for this part of the church—the Last Judgment. An inscription ("Gislebertus hoc fecit” “Gislebertus made me”), at the base of the giant immobile figure of Christ at the center, records the name of the artist or head of the workshop which produced it, though it has been suggested that it may refer to the original patron who was responsible for bringing the
of Lazurus to Autun in the Carolingian period.

The influence of ancient Rome

One influence on the Romanesque is, as the name implies, ancient Roman art—especially sculpture—which survived in large quantities particularly in southern Europe. This can be seen, for example, in a marble relief representing the calling of St. Peter and St. Andrew from the front
of the abbey church of Sant Pere de Rodes on the Catalonian coast. The imprint of the antique can be seen in the deep undercutting in the drapery folds, an effect achieved by the Roman device of the drill, and the individualization of the faces.
Calling of St. Peter and St. Andrew, c. 1160, marble, Sant Pere de Rodes monastery, Spain (photo: Enric, CC BY-SA 4.0)
Classical influence was also frequently mediated through an intermediary—most importantly Byzantine art (especially textiles and painting), but also through earlier medieval styles which had absorbed elements of the classical tradition such as Ottonian art.
The Bury Bible, c. 1130–35, Bury St Edmunds, England, MS 2, fol. 94 (Corpus Christi College, Cambridge)
The illustrations in The Bury Bible have, for example, been convincingly compared to Byzantine wall-paintings in a church at Asinou in Cyprus which suggests that its artist—a certain Master Hugo (having the name of the artist is unusual during this period) had seen them or a similar source. Monasteries such as that of Bury St. Edmunds in East Anglia in England (where the Bury Bible was made) were important centers of production—especially for the writing and decorating of manuscripts. The Bury Bible is a good example of the remarkable achievements of monastic scriptoria in the Romanesque period.
Monasteries were not the only centers of production. Romanesque art is also associated with towns that were revived and expanded during this period—for the first time since the fall of the Roman empire—a consequence of broad economic expansion (examples include Assisi in Umbria with its Romanesque cathedral or the newly founded town of Puente La Reina in northern Spain on the pilgrimage route to Santiago de Compostela).
Casket with troubadours, c. 1180, copper, enamel, gold, from the court of Aquitaine, Limoges, France, 21 x 15.6 x 11 cm (© The Trustees of the British Museum)
Romanesque art is for the most part religious in its imagery, but this is partly a matter of what has survived, and there are examples of secular art from the period. Unusual is a casket in The British Museum, a product of Limoges craftsmanship, which is made of wood with champlevé enamels attached to it (produced by heating powdered glass set into groves hollowed out of bronze plate). This is decorated with scenes to do with courtly love inspired by troubadour poets from Provence.
Stavelot Triptych, c. 1156–58, gold and enamel, 48 x 66 cm open (The Morgan Library and Museum, New York)


The distinction between the fine and decorative arts is one that emerges only in the Renaissance and does not apply at this earlier period. If anything the most highly valued works of art during the Romanesque period were objects of metalwork made from precious metals that were frequently produced to house relics (characteristically the body part of a saint, or—in the case of Christ who, the faithful believe ascended to heaven—objects associated with him such as fragments of the so-called true cross on which Christ was thought to have been crucified).
An example of this is the reliquary known as the Stavelot Triptych. It consists of a central panel flanked by side wings that can be closed, a design format derived from Byzantine art but made at the Benedictine monastery of Stavelot in the Mosan region in present day Belgium in the mid-twelfth century. The triptych was commissioned by the abbot, a man called Wibald, whom we know travelled extensively and who acquired, during a trip to Constantinople, the two Byzantine enamel plaques incorporated into the center of the triptych that contain what were believed to be fragments of the true cross.
Master of Taüll, apse painting, Sant Clement in Taüll, c. 1123 (Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya, Barcelona)

A wall painting from San Clemente in Catalonia

The apse wall-painting from the church of San Clemente is a good example of the Romanesque style. The church is situated in a remote valley in northern Catalonia (north-east Spain today) and is typical of the handsome stone-built churches which sprung up in this region in the Romanesque period. The painting would have been painted onto fresh plaster applied to the walls of the church (it was transferred for safekeeping to the Museum of Catalan Art in Barcelona early in the twentieth century). The painting is dominated by the giant figure of Christ in a mandorla (a halo around the body of a sacred person), represented as he will appear at the end of time as described in the Book of Revelation.
Mary (detail), Master of Taüll, apse painting, Sant Clement (Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya, Barcelona)
Christ is represented characteristically out of scale to the other figures to indicate his status. His head is distorted, elongated and highly geometric, and he has piercing hypnotic eyes. To either side of him are written the Greek letters “alpha” and “omega” (the beginning and the end), and with one hand he gestures in blessing, while the other holds an open book with the words Ego sum lux mundi (I am the light of the world) inscribed on it. Below him is an equally elongated and distorted figure of the Virgin Mary who holds a chalice with Christ’s blood, a representation of the Holy Grail which predates the earliest written description of the subject. Her presence in the scheme is symptomatic of the growing cult of the Virgin Mary at this period.
It would be just as much a mistake to regard the lack of naturalism found in this painting as indicating lack of artistic competence as it would be in a work by Picasso. Rather it indicates that its artist (whose real name we do not know) is not interested in replicating external appearances but rather in conveying a sense of the sacred and communicating the religious teachings of the church. Picasso (who was brought up in Barcelona) greatly admired Catalonian Romanesque, and it is significant that later in his life he kept a poster of this painting in his studio in southern France. We live in a world saturated with images but in the Romanesque period people would rarely encounter them and an image such as this would have made an immense impression.

Want to join the conversation?

  • leaf orange style avatar for user Jeff Kelman
    I have heard the following argument made many times now by art historians, "...It would be just as much a mistake to regard the lack of naturalism found in this painting as indicating lack of artistic competence as it would be in a work by Picasso."

    I now believe that the above statement is partially true (I once didn't believe it at all), but I still have this question...

    IF in fact the art of this era was made with great artistic "competence" and in fact the style was an artistic "choice"...then how come we don't see any examples of true naturalism during the Medieval era? I am not doubting what art historians are saying in it's entirety...I would be satisfied with even just a mere one example of naturalistic painting or sculpture from the Medieval era. If in fact not one example exists...then I think art historians need to do a better job making a case for why this non-naturalistic style is only an artistic choice...after all, we know as a fact that Pablo Picasso very well could paint in naturalistic style, but most certainly CHOSE not to...
    (13 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • duskpin tree style avatar for user Hannah
      Hi Jeff - your skepticism is legitimate. Today most people value naturalism in art, so we value the cultures that produced naturalistic art (especially Greek and Roman, and the Renaissance) and we don't really get why anyone would choose not to paint people that look like people. But consider the opposite. What if someone accused Raphael or Leonardo of not knowing how to paint with excessive amounts of gold, or criticized Michelangelo for his interest in human anatomy? They would respond that they make these choices based on contemporary taste, how best to convey meaning, demands of their patrons, etc. I'm sure that many artists in the Middle Ages lacked the technical skills that we value, but it would be more constructive to approach these objects asking why artists made the choices they did rather than why they didn't do other things.
      (14 votes)
  • male robot hal style avatar for user Sven Iwertowski
    I wonder if the elongated faces are not just because the onlookers right below it have the "right" perspective?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Rebekah Hedquist
    my teacher is having us write about women during the Romanesque period and it seems like they are not mentioned once during the readings that I have done or anything.
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user ssachs
    Why is "Gislebertus hoc fecit" translated as Gislebertus made me? Hoc = this
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • aqualine tree style avatar for user David Alexander
      How about, "Gislebertus made this" ? The meaning of the inscription is as the essay gave it.
      Translation, like pictoral art, is an art. Though the words, in their Latin syntax, certainly say,
      "Gislebertus this made", we don't insist on using Latin syntax when translating them into English. Neither need we be so literalistic about the meaning of individual words when the meaning of the phrase is "Gislebertus made me".
      (3 votes)