Main content
Music
Course: Music > Unit 3
Lesson 13: Bright Sheng: "Black Swan", the composer and his workBright Sheng: "Black Swan". The composer and his work
Want to join the conversation?
- Did the composers in the 1700's and 1800's have all the instruments that we have today?(7 votes)
- Another aspect to consider is how the sounds that instruments make has changed over time. Virtually every instrument has evolved in some form over time. A composer may have written a work or phrase with the intent to capture the specific sound of an instrument or group of instruments as heard and played at the time of the composition. New manufacturing techniques, changes in key work or the bore size of brass and woodwind instruments, the different materials used to make the instruments, etc., have changed the sounds that today's’ instruments make when compared to the sounds the same instruments made in the 1700s or 1800s. Today’s clarinets, horns, bassoons and other instruments sound different than those used 100 or 200 years ago. Listening to a composition performed on period instruments will give the listener a different feel of that music when compared the same music performed with modern instruments.(8 votes)
- is composing really good to the orchestra?(4 votes)
- Yes, of course! Without a composer there is no music! The composer (who composes) is the one who creates the piece! Good question!(7 votes)
- Who made the Black Swan?(3 votes)
- Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky composed "The Black Swan". You can find more on him here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Ilyich_Tchaikovsky(4 votes)
- AtDoes anyone else here that noise whenever he is talking? And I'm not talking about his talking. I head a weird noise. 0:51(3 votes)
- I wonder how to get full score for this beautiful piece.(2 votes)
- there is a site you can go to called muse score.com(3 votes)
- Why did Bright Sheng write Black Swan(2 votes)
- because he likes composing and he makes money from it.(2 votes)
- Where can I find a version of this for a smaller band? It'd be interesting to hear by, say a concert band.(2 votes)
- there isnt a version like that. a version like that wouldn't have as much details and would be missing a lot. the composer wouldnt want his work to be missing out any details. you have to work hard for the achievement. there arent any shortcuts(2 votes)
- What is the snake-like squiggly line in the score at? I have never encountered this before in a score. Does it have any special significance, either for the harp player or the conductor? Thank you in advance for any explanation. 3:37(2 votes)
- they are probably notes made by the composer, or they design how you play it, like for example, if you write that above a flute's notes, it might indicate that the sound is like a shrill, so it should sound like a scream(2 votes)
- Why did he compose this piece?(1 vote)
Video transcript
(orchestra music) - When you ask composers who
their favorite composer is, you get unusual answers. Richard Strauss, for
example, who wrote Elektra and Rosenkavalier and
the great tone poems, Till Eulenspiegel, Zarathustra, his favorite composer was Mozart. Tchaikovsky, this great
romantic who wrote music that was so passionate
and so full of drama, his favorite composer was Mozart. You wouldn't think that,
and they used them a lot, I mean, Strauss for example,
conducted Mozart a lot. Tchaikovsky actually wrote
a suite called Mozartiana, where he took Mozart pieces
and orchestrated them in the Liszt version,
which is a little unusual, but it was still Mozart. Well if you ask Bright Sheng,
the Chinese-American composer, I think he would say
Brahms and he orchestrated this gorgeous piano piano
piece, Opus 118 No. 2 of Brahms. - To me this is more than inspiration, I just simply used the Brahms
piece, that Opus 118 No. 2, which is one of my favorite
piano pieces as a pianist, and I made arrangements to
make an orchestra version. - The music is serene and tender and he uses the orchestra
in a very interesting way. So when I say orchestrate,
clearly that means taking piano music and
putting it in an orchestra, so if you have a single note on the piano, you could play it on, let's say for, in the middle register,
it could be on an oboe or a trumpet or a clarinet
or a flute or a violin or a viola or a cello, they
could all play the same note, you have to make a decision,
what do you wanna convey to illuminate the music, but
also to keep it interesting? So Bright begins the piece
using flutes and violins to play the melody in a
very simple simple way. (orchestra music) This melody then gets played by the oboe and then with the flute. After those repetitions of the melody, the second melody comes in. He puts this into the brass instruments. Conversation between the
trumpets and the horns. Then the third section of the work begins and he again brings the
tune into the violins but he uses the harp as an accompaniment, he uses pizzicato cello
bass to give it a little rhythmic interest, something
you wouldn't have normally expected from Brahms. - Of course, I went a little bit beyond Brahms' orchestration. I added some things that not
traditionally Brahms would do but I think I added to the piece. For example, Brahms rarely
used a harp in his music, only a few exceptions, but
most of the symphony orchestra works he never used
harps so I used a harp. And the pizzicato part that
I used is a melodic part, which is also quite unusual. It's a little bit outside
Brahms' typical style. - The choral of the brass is now repeated, but this time in the strings, and it ends with a beautiful
quartet for four ones. The new material begins, so
now this is what we could call the middle section or the B section, the new material begins
with the flute and oboe playing the melody, string accompaniment, a lot of pizzicato in
the cellos and violas. Again, it's the kind of
thing where I point out the pizzicato, you'll
notice it, but if I had not pointed it out, it just seems
organic, it seems natural. The repetition of this
melody now is played in octaves between the first
and second violin, solo, so it's just two players,
and a third voice kind of making it into
a trio and this voice is the voice of the
cello, so this is a trio for two violins and a cello,
the repetition of that. The third repetition of that melody is now done as a brass choral. Halfway through, he brings in the harp. You wouldn't expect the harp
to be part of a brass choral, but listen to this, it's really
quite magical, what he does. Next section begins
with the strings playing in this very warm-hearted,
loud, thick, gorgeous way. It leads us slowly back to a repetition of the very beginning of the piece, this time done even softer
and with more restraint. This time, I pull back
and try to make the music just linger a little bit longer in a very soft and beautiful way. Again, the brass choral comes back, as it did the first time. This time, instead of
the strings repeating the brass choral, he uses the woodwinds. What Bright does is he uses
his tremendous sensitivity and musical knowledge and imagination to bring this piece to life. Without having analyzed it as I have, it would be fine, you don't
need to know that analysis at all, it is just gorgeous. But knowing it just shows
you the kind of work that composers do and
I remember when Bright told me he was working on this, he thought it was gonna be easy. Well, it turned out to be quite difficult because he was very careful
to try to make it seem and feel organic. - I tried to use my imagination, the color as a pianist when
I perform that on the piano, that I couldn't do because with pianos, we're always thinking, oh
this is an oboe playing, this is a horn playing, this and that, so in my orchestration
of this arrangement, I tried to bring out the colors that I couldn't do as a pianist. - He certainly wasn't
trying to orchestrate it in a way that Brahms would, no. But it certainly is true
to the spirit of the music.