Main content
Music
Course: Music > Unit 3
Lesson 9: Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 5- Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 5. Analysis by Gerard Schwarz (part 1)
- Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 5. Analysis by Gerard Schwarz (part 2)
- Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 5. Analysis by Gerard Schwarz (part 3)
- Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 5. Analysis by Gerard Schwarz (part 4)
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Dmitri Shostakovich: Symphony No. 5. Analysis by Gerard Schwarz (part 4)
Want to join the conversation?
- Would one be able to find sheet music for the violin parts of the 5th symphony, or are those kind of things only allowed to be viewed by professionals?(4 votes)
- If you have a university nearby with a symphony orchestra then they should have the full score and all parts in their library for Shostakovich 5. If you ask nicely you may be able to get a copy from the orchestra librarian (which is not the same person as the librarian of any of the school's libraries.
There are publishers and rental companies that sell and rent scores and parts. This is really the path you should take, as it is the legal path. I am sure you could call one of these companies, explain what you want and work something out without having to buy a complete set. It is not uncommon for an orchestra to lose a single violin I part, for example, and need to just replace that one part.(3 votes)
- Why does the composer develope his themes instead of adding themes(4 votes)
- Interesting he mentioned the Bernstein performance with the NY Phil, not really his fault, since the edition Bernstein used had a misprint for the coda's tempo.(3 votes)
- There is also speculative evidence that Shostakovitch liked Bernstein's interpretation at the end where there is a photo of Shostakovitch shaking Bernstein's hand in great approval in a newspaper cover after his recording of the 5th symphony. Nevertheless, this topic shall still be debated on for generations to come.(2 votes)
- atwhy was the music added? 0:13(3 votes)
- why is there no bars on the top lines(2 votes)
- Good question! There are no bars on the top line notes, because there is not enough room for all the lines and notes! So, one has to just remember them! Also, there is a thing called a 8va and it tells you that whatever notes you play, play them an active higher.(3 votes)
- I wonder why in the orchestra in the woodwind sections, did they never make a part for the saxophones in the symphonies?(2 votes)
- Probably because the saxophone wasn't widely available until fairly late in the history for classical music. It wasn't invented until the mid-19th century and even then, wasn't widely available for use until late 19th/early 20th century. It's more common still today in military bands and brass ensembles, which is a slightly different type of music than symphonic works--of which the bulk were written prior to saxophone popularity. It takes time for innovation to become widespread! Modern-day symphonies are far more likely to contain saxophone than early 20th century works, and obviously most anything before that won't have it at all.
Hope that helps!(2 votes)
- WHAT do you mean it is not a positive ending?!(2 votes)
- Why does everyone wear black?(1 vote)
Video transcript
- The finale, last movement, starts out with this aggressive trill, and then the timpani,
bam, bam, bam, bam, bam. I mean, this is a march,
this is a diabolical march. And the brass come in playing this march. ("Symphony No. 5" by Dmitri Shostakovich) The strings take over and, in fact, they have the second part of this motive. And Shostakovich develops it right away. He takes the material of the violins, and material of the brass, and he immediately makes that into a whole section on its own. So he doesn't introduce more
material, he just takes that, in an imaginative way,
develops it incredibly until this new theme comes in, and the new theme is
played by the trumpet. So after the trumpet states that, that material grows and grows, and then all of a sudden
in the most positive expression the whole string
section plays that melody, and it's just a great moment. It builds to a high pitch, and then the timpani come in, and then we have the first theme played by the trombones as a canon. So the trombones start and then the trumpets and horns come in, and it leads to this
great, tremendous climax, and what do we hear but the same rhythm that we always hear, this. (repeating piano keys playing) That Shostakovich accompany rhythm. Eventually the violins come in playing an accompaniment passage, and the second theme is
played in a very poignant way by the solo horn, again, one of the most beautiful
horn solos in the repertoire. We talked about the first theme and having a second
part of the first theme. At the end of the horn
solo the string come in and they a kind of an extension, it's kind of a bridge, and
then they play that same melody that we heard but in an augmented way. Very poignant, very beautiful. Then, the harp comes in in this kind of, again, suspended way
and the timpani start, ba-ba-bum, ba-ba-ba-ba-ba,
and the snare drum, and we hear the first theme. The trumpet, you know,
that started the movement, but this time played very
softly by the woodwinds as if it were from a distance. It was from somewhere else and it's done in a very different way. Over that, eventually
clarinets and oboes come in playing an accompaniment that
are just all quicker notes. And eventually the strings come in, those eighth notes keep going, and he starts to build to
this triumphant ending. So here is the question for all of us, what is this, is it a
very positive ending? What you have is, you
have these repeated notes that we heard from the oboes. (repeated piano keys playing) Going on and going on and going on. And then the material is in a major key but Shostakovich does it in a slow way. It's not a fast ending. He brings the timpani in just like the beginning of the movement. But he has this repetition
of these notes, this. (repeated piano keys playing) Going on forever, while the trumpets play. (simple piano melody) And the timpani, bom-bom-bom-bom. So the question is, for so many of us, is it a very positive ending? Well, yeah, it is. Or, no, it's not. I'm from the no it's not group. I find it to be as powerful and poignant as anything in a minor key would be. There was a famous
performance in the late 1950s that Leonard Bernstein did
with the New York Philharmonic, where he did the whole ending very fast. Not written that way
but he did it that way, and that sounds very positive. There's no question if
you do it really fast, boom, it's over and it's a great coda. But if you do it the way he wrote it, it has a whole different
psychological poignancy that is quite remarkable.