Main content
Europe 1300 - 1800
Course: Europe 1300 - 1800 > Unit 9
Lesson 3: Flanders- Peter Paul Rubens, Mulay Ahmad
- Peter Paul Rubens, Elevation of the Cross
- Rubens, Elevation of the Cross
- Rubens, The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus
- Rubens, The Presentation of the Portrait of Marie de' Medici
- Rubens, The Presentation of the Portrait of Marie de' Medici
- Rubens, Arrival (or Disembarkation) of Marie de Medici at Marseilles, Medici Cycle
- Peter Paul Rubens, The Apotheosis of Henry IV and the Proclamation of the Regency of Marie de’ Médici
- Rubens, Venus, Mars and Cupid
- Rubens, the Consequences of War
- Rubens, Rubens and Isabella Brant in the Honeysuckle Bower
- Anthony van Dyck, Charles I at the Hunt
- Anthony van Dyck, Samson and Delilah
- Baroque art in Flanders
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Rubens, The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus
Sir Peter Paul Rubens, The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus, 1617-18, oil on canvas, 224 x 210.5 cm, Alte Pinakothek, Munich Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- I heard in a lecture about Baroque music that the term "Baroque" originally was an insult to the music (saying that it was over-complicated). Did the term "Baroque" for visual art have a similar origin? As an insult?(26 votes)
- The term "baroque" was used to complain about the complexity and/or excessivity of art or music until at least 1888, when Wölfflin rehabilitated it in his book "Renaissance und Barock" and established it as a stylistic category and a serious area of study.
The origin of the word itself, wherever it may truly come from, always translates to "rough or imperfect pearl", which, I think, can be understood as deprecatory.
So yes, I think it was meant as an insult to both, art and music (which is a form of art).(24 votes)
- This is really excellent. Like most contemporary viewers I think, I find something inaccessible about Rubens' style here. The opening parts of the conversation bring that out really well. But by the end the painting really comes alive, with all its tension and compositional brilliance. Thanks!(12 votes)
- What about the angel on the brown horse? I find it really odd to see an angel in a scene as this. Kind of creepy.(6 votes)
- As this is a painting based on a classical myth, I think the figure could be Cupid or Eros (the Roman or Greek god of love). He definitely looks mischievous to me, almost as if he's pleased by what's going on.(5 votes)
- What does Flanders mean I'm going into 4th grade so i don't know.(2 votes)
- Flanders is a country in the Northern part of Belgium where Dutch is spoken, it is also the title of the famous war poem 'In Flanders Fields' by John McCrae as it was a battlefield during World War One(9 votes)
- Hi, I would like to know if the bracelet on an arm of one of the daughter's has been identified? Also, do we know who is Castor and Pollux on this canvas and who is Phoebe and Halaira? Could not find it anywhere. Thank you ahead. Dita.(3 votes)
- What kind of people are they,and what are they doing to each other.(1 vote)
- This is an artist's painting of a mythical event. Some people are taking away the daughters of their defeated enemy as prizes of war. The males are taking, and the females are resisting.(2 votes)
Video transcript
(bouncy piano music) >> We're in the Alte Pinakothek in Munich and we're looking at Reuben's The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus. >> Reuben's is using this ancient myth to portray what he's
interested in, the human body. >> Specifically the female body. >> We should spend just
a second talking about who these figures are. The men are Castor and Pollax and they are the cousins of the men
that are supposed to be marrying these two young women. >> The poses don't really
look natural do they? >> No, not at all. >> They're supposed to be being abducted, taken away to be raped, these two women who are
about to be married, and yet there's something
melodramatic about their gestures, something
that doesn't quite suit the tragedy of the moment. >> Yes. It's almost as if this is the overwrought gesture that we expect from the silent film era. >> Exactly. >> But that's because
Reuben's is interested in rendering and articulating the human body as this expressive form and there's nothing literal about it. >> Look at the impossibility
of the positions of the bodies, the amazing
amounts of twisting, seems highly unlikely. >> Oddly, there's also a kind of balance. Reuben's is creating
this complex composition asking us to look at the form as a whole. >> Absolutely. There's
a real sense of frenetic movement, a horse
rearing in one direction, another horse rearing in another, a woman falling down, a
woman rising up and yet at the very same time it's all very carefully composed. >> Steady to panic. >> Exactly. It's really impossible to look at this without the frame of Baroque Art, which is interested in movement and forms that burst out of the frame of the canvas. >> Right. All of these elements, all of these contradictions that we're talking about are actually characteristics of the Baroque, all of this energy, all of this movement and yet, Reuben's is a court
painter and so there is a polished clarity, there
is a compositional order. >> As is typical in Baroque Art, we have a composition
that is constructed by two interlocking diagonal lines. We move from the upper left where we've got the horse looking
down toward the central female figure and then
we follow that figure down toward the lower figure's right arm that takes us to the
corner of the painting. We have a similar diagonal moving from the bottom left to the
upper right with the horse's hooves, the woman's foot, up through her arm to the upper right corner. >> Look at the way in
which the top woman's thigh is then picked up by the right arm of the lower figure so that there is this relationship between those two bodies that is visual, if not actual. >> Actually there's
relationships all over, that's why I think it's
so important to talk about how carefully composed it is. There's rhyming of forms everywhere. Look at the bent left
leg of the central woman. It's repeated in the bent left leg of the brown horse or the
way of the curve of the neck of the brown horse is mirrored in the curve of the man's neck. >> Reuben seems to be
delighting in the way in which the bodies are coming together. Look at the bottom of the painting. You see the woman's foot
on the man's that is unexpected, maybe even uncomfortable. >> The tension in that space between the two female bodies. >> Right. There's that negative space that really forces apart those two figures. It's a kind of rupture. Those colors and light and the movement of the two women seem to go together, seem to pull together, want to actually merge
and become a kind of single figure and then
there's the handling of the paint itself. Look at the colors in those bodies. Look at the pinks and greens, yellows, the flesh tones which are prisms and you get a sense of the
translucency of the flesh. >> Look at how much
fore-shortening we've got the male figure on the right who strides towards us, the brown
horse who's facing us, the woman on the bottom who's falling out of the picture. This couldn't get any
closer to us than it is. (bouncy piano music)