If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Jacques-Louis David, The Death of Marat

Jacques-Louis David, The Death of Marat, 1793, oil on canvas, 65 x 50-1/2 inches (Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, Brussels)

Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker

.
Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.

Want to join the conversation?

  • cacteye yellow style avatar for user Karlar
    What skin issue did he have?
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user dablank47
    i almost got kicked out of grad school, art history, for being interested in neo-classicism, and in particularj j.l. david. however i beg to differ with khan academy suggesting that marat was a noble free thinker of the revolution in france. where do you get your information to support this theory? beheading is not particularly sensitive,or an enlightened action and in such numbers. what occured then was almost like genocide, much like the modern equivalent that we now have with isis. and it also aimed itself at destroying works of cultural heritage. coudray is a relative, and she disabled, in some sense one of the most dangerous men in the country at that time, by appealing to his vanity. he showed no humanity in actions during the french revolution, but rather a blood bath. david did believe, but his real loyalty was to his art. j.blank
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user C P
    Would anyone be able to tell me why in the studio replica of this painting that's in the Louvre is different? (e.g. instead of 'A Marat' is says 'N'ayant pu me corrompre, Ils m'ont assassiné')
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user dablank47
      painting in louvre translates as "unable to bribe me, they murdered me." corrompre which is french could be corrupt me in english. the french assassinates, is of course assasinate. when translating, you can not exppect word for word meaning. whether marat said this is not been verified. the painting in brussels belgium is " a' marat, to marat," which would seem to be a dedication, as in "to you, marat", being possibly less political. david was imprisoned, which might have the effect of cooling the painter's ardor for the revolution.
      (5 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Sarit Greidingher
    Which art movement is the painting defined formally? Cause as more as i look at it - it seems relevant to bunch of movements
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Rebecca
    This is a beautiful, haunting painting. Yet I question the approach here. The narrators here seem to be taken in completely by what David has portrayed. This was, in part, propaganda. He's idealizing this man who was less than ideal--yet the video seems to almost agree with David about Marat. It seems odd to present what seems to be a slight bias in favor of Marat and the revolutionaries when in truth, the whole situation was intensely complicated and difficult for us to comprehend entirely today. This analysis seems very interested in analyzing the art (and that part is wonderful) while ignoring part of the historical context. For example, Charlotte Corday was in favor of the revolution--just a more moderate version. She sympathized with the Girondins, who wanted change, but not necessarily in the extreme way that Marat, etc, did. Yes, I see that you wrote a small note hinting about this at the side, but the words being spoken do not reflect this complexity. Simplifying her as a monarchist perpetuates the idea that there were two sides here-- the king versus the common people, and that wasn't the case at all. Also, it's inaccurate to say that he's holding the letter she used to gain access to speak to him. Yes, there was a letter, and yes, David is presenting a letter here, but you never acknowledge that the words we see here are not the true words that were on Corday's letter. To use the word "duplicitous" and yet to never point out clearly that all of this is through the lens of David and how he wants this to all seem to us seems negligent. He decided what he wanted the letter to say, here, and that impacted how Corday is seen (or more importantly, not seen) in this painting. David has set the scene for us here and it is a stunning work, a fascinating product of its time, but not a true representation of that moment. I guess my question is--can paintings that depict history be divorced from the history they represent? How much history is necessary to cover to understand these classic works, and how much should we just let them live on their own?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user harpdudet
    At about Dr. Zucker states that the French Revolution was inspired by the American Revolution. However, I find that the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution have more in common while the American Revolution and the "Bloodless English Revolution" have more in common . Does anyone agree or disagree?
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf red style avatar for user Rober García
      I disagree with you. The American Revolution was extremely violent and kept slavery as one of the pilars of the systems. On the other side, the French Revolution was also violent, but a violence focused in eliminating the last representanst of the Ancien Regime. The Convention abolished slavery in France and the Colonies. Neither Robespierre nor Marat or David or Saint-Just were never slave owners. That is quite a difference.
      (2 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Sarit Greidingher
    Is there by any chance a connection between that piece and the story of the three musketeers not on them but them on it? becuase all the idea for : one for all and all for one? how can it be checked since it is put as an historical novel that taks about the 16th but written in the 19th
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- [Voiceover] We're in Brussels looking at one of Jacques-Louis David's Revolutionary canvases. This is "The Death of Morat". - [Voiceover] Revolutionary in two senses. Revolutionary in that it was painted during the French Revolution, which started in 1789. France was made a republic in 1792. And David here commemorates a hero of the Revolution. But it's also revolutionary in that it's depicting a contemporary event. Before this David had painted scenes from classical antiquity. - [Voiceover] Early on in the Revolution, David had joined the Jacobin Club. This was a group of the most violent and radical revolutionaries. And David himself became quite close with the leader of the Jacobins, Robespierre. - [Voiceover] David voted for the beheading of King Louis XVI. His signature is on documents created for the arrest and execution of members of the aristocracy, of people who were against the Revolution. So David was really in the thick of it. He served in the Revolutionary government. He helped to dissolve the Royal Academy of the Arts. And he was essentially the Minister of Propaganda, spreading the ideals of the Revolution through images. - [Voiceover] And that's what this is. The Revolutionary government asked him to produce a series of three images that would heroicize new martyrs. Not a Christian martyr, but now a martyr to the Revolution. - [Voiceover] This shift from Christian martyr to political martyr is an important one. We have the beginnings of the end of the world of the monarchy, of the the "ancien régime", of an absolutist ruler, and the beginnings of a new republic. The beginnings of a world where the people participate in the government. - [Voiceover] The French Revolution had been inspired, at least in part, by the American Revolution just a few years earlier. But France would oscillate between republican and royalist governments over the next century. - [Voiceover] A royalist named Charlotte Corday, a woman who believed in the monarchy of absolutist rule, went to see Marat, the leader of the Revolution. And by tricking him, murdered him in his bathtub. - [Voiceover] You can see the knife which she used to stab him lying on the bottom left corner of the canvas. And the letter that she used to gain entrance being held by Marat. He was a publisher, so his role in the Revolution was important, because he helped to disseminate revolutionary ideas and to rally the people. - [Voiceover] He holds this letter that she used to get in to see him. David is showing, look at how duplicitous this woman was. She tricked Marat, he was innocent, he was good. He was working for the republic, for the French Revolution. And she came in and brutally stabbed him. - [Voiceover] There is this extreme contrast between her duplicity and his nobility. - [Voiceover] He's ideally beautiful. We know that he was disfigured by the skin disease that caused him to spend many hours of each day in the bath. You have no sign of that here. - [Voiceover] And his pose reminds us of the Pietà, of the image of Christ being mourned having just been taken down from the cross. So the idea that a martyr to the Revolution is replacing the central Christian martyr is vividly rendered. - [Voiceover] That was a key idea of the Revolution. To dismantle, not only the monarchy, but the church as well. And to secularize French life. And we see that also in the creation of a new calendar for the Revolution. And below the signature, David has written "Year Two". So we're not in 1793, we're in Year Two of the Revolution. This whole replacing of the old world with a new Revolutionary order for a new French republic. - [Voiceover] The idea of rationalism was being violently instituted. Instead of the older, traditional measurements for example, this is when we first have the more rational metric system being introduced. - [Voiceover] This is the Enlightenment, this is a time of rational thinking, of believing in empirical observation over the superstitions and traditions of the church. - [Voiceover] And this is a painting that is all about observations. This really interesting contrast between the specificity of the foreground, especially the crate on which he's written his name, and written "Á Marat", "To Marat". Against the indeterminate, open brushwork of the background that almost doesn't look finished. It's got this soft, feathery, warm quality. - [Voiceover] It isolates Marat, it focuses our attention on him. - [Voiceover] But as we look around at other paintings in this museum, what I see in the upper part of a painting are angels. And David can't have that anymore. And a new iconography has not yet developed. So instead what we have is a lighter field in the upper right corner balancing Marat's body in the lower left corner. - [Voiceover] And what a body. The anatomy, the muscles in the shoulder and the arms and the collarbone. We can see that neoclassical interest in studying the anatomy, painting it very carefully, paying a lot of attention to contours, modelling in the effects of light and dark. But what strikes me is the spareness. In direct contrast to the luxurious interiors of Rococo paintings of the lifestyle of the aristocracy, which was the subject of Rococo paintings. Here, a decidedly stark interior, Spartan, no elaborate furniture, no gold. This is a man, David wants to tell us, lived according to the republican ideals of the Revolution. - [Voiceover] And it looks like they will endure forever. But soon the Revolutionaries will turn against each other. - [Voiceover] And David is imprisoned for his involvement in the Revolution. And then becomes First Painter to Napoleon, who becomes the Emperor of France. And so a lot of art historians look at David's career and say, "Where were his actual principles?" - [Voiceover] Where were his loyalties? - [Voiceover] Did he truly believe in the ideals of the Revolution? And then become a follower of Napoleon and abandon those values? - [Voiceover] Or was he politically mercenary? Was he really looking for commissions from whoever was in control at that moment? It's hard to look at "The Death of Marat" and not see a man who was convinced of the importance of Revolutionary ideals.