If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

1860-1910: learning resources

Eastman Johnson, A Ride for Liberty — The Fugitive Slaves

Eastman Johnson, A Ride for Liberty — The Fugitive Slaves, c. 1862, oil on paperboard, 55.8 x 66.4 cm (Brooklyn Museum)
Eastman Johnson, A Ride for Liberty — The Fugitive Slaves, c. 1862, oil on paperboard, 55.8 x 66.4 cm (Brooklyn Museum)

Key points

  • As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act required the return of any escaped slave, even if they were in free states. This policy changed during the Civil War, when a series of Confiscation Acts allowed Union troops to free southern slaves as contraband of war. Many of these freed slaves provided intelligence and support to the Union Army.
  • Eastman Johnson’s Ride for Liberty depicts a family of enslaved people escaping to the Union lines in the dim light of dawn. Unlike many contemporary images of African Americans, which marginalized or caricatured them, Johnson shows them as active and sympathetic figures. Although they are nearly silhouettes, he captures a sense of danger and resolve.
  • Painted in the midst of the Civil War, Johnson claimed to have witnessed this scene on a battlefield in Virginia. Although he painted several versions of the subject, they were never publicly exhibited or sold during his lifetime.

Go deeper

More to think about

In the video, both narrators wonder what the reception of Eastman Johnson’s Ride for Liberty might have been had it been exhibited shortly after it was painted. Think about some of the different kinds of viewers there would have been for this painting in the 1860s. How might their reactions have been similar or different depending on their identity or political views?

Envisioning Manifest Destiny, Leutze's Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way

Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze, Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way (mural study for the United States Capitol building), 1861, oil on canvas, 84.5 x 110.1 cm (Smithsonian American Art Museum, Bequest of Sara Carr Upton, 1931.6.1)
Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze, Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way (mural study for the United States Capitol building), 1861, oil on canvas, 84.5 x 110.1 cm (Smithsonian American Art Museum, Bequest of Sara Carr Upton, 1931.6.1)
Key points
  • In this study for a public mural at the U.S. Capitol Building, Emmanuel Leutze visualized the concept of Manifest Destiny, combining religious and patriotic imagery to glorify westward expansion.
  • In an era when few Americans had traveled west, Leutze brings together a variety of landforms and artefacts to conjure this unfamiliar terrain and create a sense of drama and excitement. He depicted the land as uncharted territory, however, erasing its recent history as part of Mexico and the Native Americans who were displaced by American settlers.
  • In the early years of the American Civil War, Leutze emphasized the west as a land of promise and opportunity that could restore national unity. After reading a draft of Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, he added an African-American figure to the final mural in the Capitol Building.

Go deeper

More to think about

In this celebration of westward expansion, Emmanuel Leutze alludes to California through small details in the picture, but his subject focuses primarily around the settlers and their journey. Why do you think he chose to emphasize their trek instead of their final destination? How might the painting’s meaning be different if he had given more attention to where these figures settled?

Mending America, women and the Civil War

Lilly Martin Spencer, The Home of the Red, White, and Blue, c. 1867–68, oil on canvas, 24 x 30 inches (Terra Foundation for American Art, Daniel J. Terra Art Acquisition Endowment Fund, 2007.1)
Lilly Martin Spencer, The Home of the Red, White, and Blue, c. 1867–68, oil on canvas, 24 x 30 inches (Terra Foundation for American Art, Daniel J. Terra Art Acquisition Endowment Fund, 2007.1)

Key points

  • During the Civil War, women entered the workforce and contributed to the war effort. In the difficult years of the Reconstruction, their role was less clear, but many felt a patriotic duty to help restore the union. Along with freed African-Americans, an influx of immigration, and the vast number of young men injured in the war, this was a period of redefining the American workforce.
  • Lilly Martin Spencer’s The Home of the Red, White, and Blue uses symbolism to establish the American family as essential to the restoration of the American union. She also highlights the role of women and immigrants as part of that future.
  • Although, as a woman, she was barred from attending art school, Lilly Martin Spencer blended elements of academic art with her contemporary and familiar subject. The pyramidal composition directs the viewer to the central figures and suggests stability while her use of atmospheric perspective creates a sense of depth.

Go deeper

[Explore a teaching guide to another Spencer painting that contains a biography and historical context for women of her time]

More to think about

Although The Home of the Red, White, and Blue includes a range of figures important to the restoration of the United States following the Civil War, not all Americans are represented in the painting. Who is missing, and why do you think that might be?

Jacob Riis, How the Other Half Lives, Knee-Pants at Forty-Five Cents a Dozen—A Ludlow Street Sweater’s Shop

Jacob August Riis, “Knee-pants” at forty five cents a dozen—A Ludlow Street Sweater’s Shop, c. 1890, 7 x 6″, from How the Other Half Lives: Studies Among the Tenements of New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons: New York, 1890 (The Museum of the City of New York)
Jacob August Riis, “Knee-pants” at forty five cents a dozen—A Ludlow Street Sweater’s Shop, c. 1890, 7 x 6″, from How the Other Half Lives: Studies Among the Tenements of New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons: New York, 1890 (The Museum of the City of New York)

Go deeper

Bonnie Yochelson and Daniel Czitrom, Rediscovering Jacob Riis: Exposure Journalism and Photography in Turn-of-the-Century New York ( Chicago University Press, 2014).

Visiting the Lower East Side in 1905

George Benjamin Luks, Street Scene (Hester Street), 1905, oil on canvas, 65.5 x 91.1 cm (Brooklyn Museum, 40.339, Dick S. Ramsay Fund)
George Benjamin Luks, Street Scene (Hester Street), 1905, oil on canvas, 65.5 x 91.1 cm (Brooklyn Museum, 40.339, Dick S. Ramsay Fund)

Key ideas

  • Between 1880 and 1920, more than 20 million immigrants came to America, making it the greatest period of mass migration in American history. Many recent Jewish immigrants had fled economic hardship and political violence within the Russian Empire.
  • At the time Luks painted Street Scene, New York’s Lower East Side was home to approximately 500,000 Jewish immigrants, and it was the most densely populated place on earth. The tenement buildings that surround the scene blot out all but a small sliver of blue sky, adding to this painting’s sense of the congestion of this neighborhood.
  • With growing Jewish immigration came rising nativist and antisemitic sentiment. While members of the Ashcan School, like George Luks, were revolutionary in their inclusion of unidealized urban subjects, their paintings preserved stereotypes and unequal dynamics of power. Luks had produced antisemitic caricatures for several publications during the 1890s, and the emphasis on racist stereotypes about Jewish phyisognomy can be seen in the painting.

Go deeper

More to think about

Look closely at Street Scene. What aspects of the painting do you think reveal the nativist and antisemitic sentiments the video mentions? What aspects humanize the people? How do modern images of immigration deal with similar issues?

Stieglitz, The Steerage

Alfred Stieglitz, The Steerage, 1907, photogravure, 33.5cm x 26.4cm (J. Paul Getty Museum)
Alfred Stieglitz, The Steerage, 1907, photogravure, 33.5cm x 26.4cm (J. Paul Getty Museum)

Key points

  • Often misinterpreted as a scene of American immigration, the people in Alfred Stieglitz’s The Steerage were leaving the United States, either because they had been rejected at Ellis Island, were migrant workers on temporary visas, or, like Stieglitz, were simply travelers. It speaks to the explosive growth in transatlantic crossings in the early 20th century.
  • Stieglitz celebrated The Steerage as an example of modern photography as fine art, emphasizing its geometric shape and dynamic line, elements that replaced his earlier pictorialism, which had used blurred edges and atmospheric toning to look painterly. This style embraces the mechanical camera as a tool to capture the energy of modern life.

Go deeper

More to think about

Although The Steerage has been interpreted as a statement about migration, Stieglitz himself talked about the photograph in terms of its artistic composition. Do you feel this is more of a historical document or a work of art? Are these separate categories? What makes the difference?
Stieglitz’s The Steerage has been misinterpreted as representing immigration, but it actually captures return migration on a journey back to Europe. Knowing the real subject, how can this photograph tell a more complete story of immigration and travel in America?

Want to join the conversation?

No posts yet.