Japan in World War I
Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why was Japan on the side of the Allies in WWI, but not WWII?(73 votes)
- Japan had a big population in a few islands and also Japan relied on imports for things. To solve this they set out on a conquest for land to settle on and to have resources in the country of course they had to do this by force since it is not likely that other countries would just give land.(5 votes)
- Wasn't Japan able to use some of the land that was seceded from Germany In World War 1 to stage attacks against the Allies in World War 2?(6 votes)
- That is quite correct.
Major Japanese naval and military bases were built on South Pacific Mandate (Former German Pacific colonies). They were used in most of the major battles on the Pacific front of WWII including attack on Pearl Harbor, Battles of Wake Island, etc.
As for the Tsingtao, Japan returned it to to China in 1922 but subsequently re occupied it during most of the second Sino-Japanese war (Chinese Front of the WWII) .(7 votes)
- Which Pacific islands did Japan seize from Germany?(2 votes)
- Mariana, Caroline, and Marshall Islands, all captured without any resistance.(6 votes)
- Sal talks about the League of Nations did it have anything to do with the U.N?(3 votes)
- The United Nations were established as a kind of succesor to the League of Nations after this organization had clearly failed to prevent World War II. but the idea behind both organizations was more or less the same to try to solve political problems between countries diplomatically rather than through war.(5 votes)
- What is Britain's "Splendid Isolation"?(2 votes)
- Splendid Isolation was the foreign policy pursued by Britain during the late 19th century, under the Conservative premierships of Benjamin Disraeli and The Marquess of Salisbury. The term was actually coined by a Canadian M.P. to praise Britain's lack of involvement in European affairs. There is much debate between historians over whether this policy was intentional or whether Britain simply became a victim of its surroundings.
As descriptive of British foreign policy, the phrase was most famously used by Viscount George Goschen, First Lord of the Admiralty, during a speech at Lewes, England, on February 26, 1896, when he said: "We have stood here alone in what is called isolation -- our splendid isolation, as one of our colonial friends was good enough to call it." The phrase had appeared in a headline in The Times a few weeks earlier, on January 22, 1896, paraphrasing a comment by Canadian Finance Minister George Eulas Foster (1847-1931) to the Parliament of Canada on January 16, 1896: "In these somewhat troublesome days when the great Mother Empire stands splendidly isolated in Europe..."
The ultimate origin of the phrase is suggested in Robert M. Hamilton's Canadian Quotations and Phrases: Literary and Historical (Hull, Que.: McClelland and Stewart, 1952), which places the Foster quotation beneath the following passage from the Introduction to Robert Cooney's Compendious History of New Brunswick, published in 1832: "Never did the 'Empress Island' appear so magnificently grand, -- she stood by herself, and there was a peculiar splendour in the loneliness of her glory." Foster began his career as an educator in New Brunswick, where he would certainly have had access to Cooney's history. Thus, the elements of, and the sentiments underlying, the phrase appear to have originated in colonial New Brunswick during the reign of William IV, approximately 64 years before it became known as a catch-phrase for British foreign policy.(5 votes)
- "We are not too proud to fight but we are too proud to accept a place of admitted inferiority in dealing with one or more of the associated nations. We want nothing but simple justice." - can I know who says this? And when he/she said it?(3 votes)
- Makino Nobuaki said that quote for a racial equality proposal in 1919,(it was proposed by Japan during the Paris Peace Conference 1919) he said the speech sometime in 1919 at a press conference. The first draft was presented to the League of Nations Commissions on February 13 1919 as an amendment to Article 21 which states that there is racial equality among other nations and just treatment in every respect making no distinction based on their race.
More info:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_Equality_Proposal,_1919(5 votes)
- what caused the japanese to side with the axis powers in WW 2?(2 votes)
- They wanted control of Southeast Asia in a similar way to Germany wanting control of Europe.
Both Japan and Germany saw the Soviet Union as a mutual threat.(5 votes)
- How did Japanese possession of some German territories improve Japan's economy?(2 votes)
- Japanese takeover of the German Pacific colonies was for military rather economical reasons. Japan during is imperial period expanded their influence in the Pacific by setting military bases on Pacific islands, exerting their control over the ocean through chains of military presence. But northern Papua New Guinea had mineral deposits such as gold, copper, and nickel.(3 votes)
- Was China a British territory at that time, and was it forced to send Chinese troops into Europe?(2 votes)
- The only people China has been conquered by are the Mongols and the Manchus. Both the Manchu and Mongol rulers of China turned Chinese though.
So no, China was not a British territory, and no, it was not forced to send Chinese troops to Europe.(2 votes)
- Were the Chinese allied with the Allies or the Central Powers in WW1?(4 votes)
- The Chinese, influenced by British Propaganda, joined the side of the Allies during WWI, in 1915.(0 votes)
Japan was not a major actor in World War I, but it did play a role. Right as war broke out in August of 1914, the Japanese were interested in taking control of German possessions. And they were already allies with the British, so they communicated with the British, and they came to an agreement that if Japan were to attack German possessions in the Pacific and in China, then Japan could take control of them. And so Japan proceeded to do this. In particular, it took a siege of Tsingtao, which we already talked about, was a German possession. These are Japanese boats landing there, Japanese troops. And this was actually of technological significance. It was the first time that you had a naval-based aerial assault. This wasn't really using what we would consider aircraft carriers, although they did carry the aircraft. But they would place them into the water, and then the aircraft would take off from the water as they tried to take the town of Tsingtao, which they were eventually able to do by the end of 1914. On top of that, they were able to take control of many of Germany's other possessions in the Pacific, specifically the Pacific Islands. And on top of that, Japan did send some aspects, or some parts of its navy, to help protect Allied fleets as far away as the Mediterranean. So Japan did play a role here. The other interesting historical note, because of Japan's involvement in World War I, is what came out of the negotiations. First of all, by being involved, it kind of put Japan at the seat of major powers. And as we'll see, in World War II, Japan ends up being one of the major players in World War II, and it's essentially going on the other side by that point. But because of its help of the Allies, Japan does have a seat at the table at the Paris Peace Conference. And as they are negotiating the Treaty of Versailles and coming up with the League of Nations, Japan is eager to kind of have an equal footing with all of the other European powers. And so it attempts to place this in the charter for the League of Nations. "The equality of nations being a basic principle of the League of Nations, the High Contracting Parties agree to accord as soon as possible to all alien nationals of states, members of the League, equal and just treatment in every respect"-- let me underline that-- "equal and just treatment in every respect, making no distinction either in law or in fact, on account of their race or nationality." Essentially the Japanese were saying, hey, look, you Europeans, you guys have to view us and-- based on the way this is phrased-- other people as equals. Just to get a sense of what the world was like then, this was not passed. Even though the League of Nations was the product of these very idealistic thoughts by Woodrow Wilson, it did not get passed. Obviously the British, they had subjugated many people in their empires. Woodrow Wilson was afraid that if this were to be included in the League of Nations, it would have trouble passing-- getting ratified in the segregated South. We now know later that the League of Nations wasn't ratified anyway. And so this essentially does not happen. And even the Japanese themselves, they were eager for equality for themselves. But as we'll see as we enter into World War II, they themselves had a sense of racial superiority and they subjugated many of the other people in Asia, especially the Chinese and the Koreans. This is an interesting quote from the Chinese delegation. "We are not too proud to fight but we are too proud to accept a place of admitted inferiority in dealing with one or more of the associated nations. We want nothing but simple justice." So it tells you how different the world was. This is not even 100 years ago. And the real relevance of World War I for Japan was it elevated it to becoming one of the powers of the world.