If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

History and prehistory

How do we know what we know about prehistory, the time before the invention of writing? Sal explains.

Want to join the conversation?

  • winston default style avatar for user Adriana Napoli
    Okay I have a question. How can they say "This bone is 8 million years old" Without knowing for sure. How do they figure out how old something is I guess is what i'm trying to say.
    (168 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • starky ultimate style avatar for user VaeSapiens
      Good question.
      There are number of methods of age estimation. Some of them include:
      1)Radiometric dating - dating via the radioactive decay of some isotopes, for example Carbon-14, Uranium to lead, Uranium to Thor, Potasium to Argon and Electron Spin Resonance dating.
      2) Dendrochronology - dating via Tree Rings.
      3) Ice cores dating
      4) Varve or Sedimentary rock dating method

      And many more. To get the best result we overlap different dating methods, which have different accuracies.
      (270 votes)
  • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user Ray ahm
    I thought carbon 14 dating was used for only once living artifacts
    (70 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Lauren Alicia Kristine
    I understand that stories can change over time, but through my understanding of paper from long ago, paper was very valuable. People would spend their whole life savings on paper. I honestly doubt that they would write something that wasn't valuable or worth remembering. When you say we need to be skeptical about what was recorded, I wanted to ask you where you get that theory from? Do you get that theory on the thought alone of things changing over time, or is that from your thorough study of history as a whole and understanding what was happening in each culture at that time? Many cultures even document similar things in different places of the world that show us how a lot of different things that happened in history are accurate, like the Great Flood.
    (17 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • boggle blue style avatar for user Davin V Jones
      Paper wasn't the only writing medium available. And the most restrictive part of writing was education/illiteracy.

      Either way, neither of those are primary reasons for sources being accurate. You also have to consider motivations for the writing. People attempting to influence others have a lot of incentive to stretch facts, invent stories, or lie in their writings if it helps them achieve their goals. Also, someone without literate capability may be dictating their imperfect memory or interpretation of events for someone else to write down.
      (37 votes)
  • leaf blue style avatar for user David Fugett
    How did you calculate 6 or 7 thousand generations over 200,000 years?
    (11 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • aqualine tree style avatar for user Jenvought83
    why did ancient peoples use rocks and bones as tools?
    (14 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • hopper cool style avatar for user COGF
      and also adding to David Alexander's reply bone and stone were the strongest things back then that they could use because leaves and sticks wouldn't be that strong and there were no metals back then
      (3 votes)
  • primosaur ultimate style avatar for user Alex Gillespie
    How do paleontologists know where to dig without just digging anywhere and hoping they find something?
    (10 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • winston baby style avatar for user lisab
    So I am confused how the 8 million year old bone isn't fully decomposed yet. I know this sounds stupid but since the bones seems intact, does that mean bones can't decompose fully?
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • boggle blue style avatar for user Davin V Jones
      Bones can decompose relatively fast if left to normal conditions. But occasionally, if they are in the right conditions, they can remain around long enough to become fossilized, as can many other materials such as wood, eggs, shells, or other structures. You can google about fossilization to learn more about the types and methods in which it can occur.
      (16 votes)
  • purple pi teal style avatar for user Omar
    Doesn't carbon exist in all organic materials?
    (9 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user 24alanzi
    So the Rosetta Stone helped define the way we understand other languages of other countries?
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • stelly orange style avatar for user cozy
      Not all countries. The Rosetta Stone was a stone (of course) that had the same text written in Greek and hieroglyphics. This made it easier for scientists to decipher hieroglyphics, and then we could understand Egyptian writing.
      (5 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user JNEYA2003
    These artifacts are so old and are scattered all around the world due to weather conditions which leads into climate change, volcanic eruptions Etc so the question how would these professionals know where to look without have the documentation of every natural disaster or even with smallest sand storm? And another thing is If a human dies tomorrow god forbid, and the unburied remains still lying there about how many years more would it take to fully go through the decaying process then if the body was buried? And is it likely to be pushed around by nature
    (8 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- [Instructor] Anatomically modern human beings have been on this planet for roughly 200,000 years. And even though that's a small fraction of the amount of time the Earth has been around, which is over 4 billion years, on a human scale it's an incredibly long amount of time. Just to put it in perspective, if this is present time, if you wanted to put, when was the Roman Empire? Well, if we're talking about 2000 years ago, it would show up on our timeline right about there. If you wanted to talk about when the pyramids were constructed, it would be right about there. You could hardly see the time difference between now and several thousand years ago. If you want to see how long we've had writing, about 5000 years is our current best estimate. Once again, it barely shows up on this timeline. How long have we had agriculture? Well, 10 to 15 thousand years. Once again, it's a small fraction of this. Another way to think about it, think about all of our ancestors, the various generations that have passed since the first appearance of anatomically modern human beings. This is over 6 or 7 thousand generations into the past. Think about all of the stories that must have happened. A lot of simple things. It might be a founding of a village, a killing of an animal, a very simple courtship, a tenderness between a mother and their child. And think about the big things, the wars, the battles, the natural disasters. It's hard for us to imagine how much has occurred even in the last hundred or two hundred or thousand years, much less 200,000 years. But we seek to understand regardless. And that is what history is all about. And as we'll see, history is in general trying to understand the stories of our past. And if we want to get a little bit more technical, we can also think about prehistory, which is, technically, the things that happened before we had writing. Because writing is our main tool for history. What I have right over here, this picture, this is Egyptian hieroglyphs. And Egyptian hieroglyphs are over 5000 years old. I could write 5000 years before the present. But even when you have writing, it's not enough as we'll see not only in this video, but in many videos as we study history and world history. It's really a lot of science and a lot of detective work to make sense of what has happened. And that understanding will constantly evolve. For example, we didn't know what these hieroglyphs said until 1799 when we found the Rosetta Stone. And what was useful about the Rosetta Stone is that they had some text written in the hieroglyphs and they had the same text then written in a Greek that we were able to understand and that started to help unlock what these hieroglyphs said. But even once you have a sense of what they say or even if you understand it quite well, you still have to do a lot of detective work and take everything with a grain of salt. You can imagine if there's a bunch of groups of people here and we get the history from this group, for some reason we were able to find what they wrote, well it might not be completely unbiased. They might have a negative view of this group or that group. And so you have to take it all with a grain of salt. At the extreme form, they might have eliminated some of these groups and then only they were around to say what actually happened. You also have to be skeptical because you don't know whether these stories are actual accounts or whether someone just made it up to fit a worldview. You also have to keep in mind that these stories, whether they were transmitted written or orally, they're oftentimes retransmitted from generation to generation, and especially in the oral case. But even in the written, you've gotta wonder what's added over each generation. You can imagine people embellishing, making the story a little bit better. Or taking out things of the story that really doesn't fit in with their worldview. So even when we have the writing, and this is once again, some images of early writing. This is the famous Sumerian cuneiform tablet here. Even when we have it, obviously, we have much much more writing as we get to the more recent past, we have to be very very very skeptical. We know, today, even if two observers observed something yesterday, something that just happened, they might have very very different perceptions of what happened. So even though there's writing, we have to be skeptical. But things get, in some ways, even more interesting before we have writing, when we go into prehistory. You might wonder how do we know anything about what happened if there's no written accounts? Well that's where the science and we get even more detective work. For example, this is a Neanderthal skull. And the type of people, the sciences that will study this, you'll hear terms like anthropologists. Anthropologists or anthropology. This is the study of present and past humans and human society. And then a subset of anthropology, which is really delving into prehistory and even history itself, is archaeology. Archaeology which is the subset of anthropology that focuses on the past study of humans and human society and they're mainly going to do it through remains. Now there's other fields, you might associate, the field of paleontologist. Paleontologist. Paleontology. You might associate this with things like dinosaur bones, but their techniques are also useful for old human remains or even pre-human remains. And so it might inform archaeology and anthropology. So for example, an archaeologist might unearth this Neanderthal skull. They will use some science in order to figure out: When did this skull enter into the ground? They might use a technique like radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon dating, which could be used for things up to around 50,000 years old, so around that time span on our timeline. And it's based on this idea that you have this atmospheric carbon-14 that actually comes from nitrogen-14 that gets between interactions with the solar wind and these cosmic particles becomes this radioactive carbon-14. And the carbon-14 which can become part of carbon dioxide incorporate into plants through photosynthesis which then get eaten into animals. So while something is living, they'll have a certain amount of carbon-14 in their tissue. But then once they die, they're now no longer adding more carbon-14. And the carbon-14 decays into the more stable carbon-12. And so based on the ratio between the carbon-14 to the carbon-12, and it takes roughly 5,000 years, 5,730 years to be exact, for roughly half of the carbon-14 to decay into carbon-12. So based on this ratio, and I go into much more detail in other videos, you can figure out how old these things are and you get reasonably precise, within a couple of a hundred, hundreds of years. If you want to go further into the past, there's things like potassium-argon dating, which is once again taking a radioactive form of potassium and using the idea that it decays into argon. And that when a volcano releases the argon in that rock, is able to go into the atmosphere, but then once it hardens, you have the decay and so you can see how long since that volcanic eruption are we looking at. And so for example, you can dig, you can do stratographic techniques right over here. Stratigraphy, I have trouble saying these words. That's looking at the various layers of the earth. And you might use some dating techniques, for example potassium-argon. Say: "Okay, this is that, a certain amount of age, "that is a certain amount of age, "this was volcanic rock from a volcanic eruption." And then you can look at the fossils. You can say: "Okay, a fossil that I found here" "is going to be newer than the stuff here" "and it's gonna be older than the stuff here" "and this might be the newest of all." So you can look at relative dating and if you're lucky enough to have some volcanic rock, you could do some of this potassium-argon dating and there's many many many other techniques. And it isn't just about saying: "Oh, this skull "was in this place in the world at this time." You can start to infer other things. You can look for fossils of the type of animals, the type of plants near these burial sites. You could see how dense these burial sites were, what type of cultures were there. You could start to make inferences. You can try to infer how these people died. You might have some trauma fractures here and you might say: "Okay, that was a violent death." You might look at their teeth to think about the type of things they might have eaten or their general health. You might look at the tools that are buried near them. This right over here, these are Paleolithic arrow, I guess, spearheads or tools right over here. Paleolithic is defined by more of these harder edges. You have Neolithic tools which have more of these smoother edges. Then Old Stone Age, New Stone Age right over here. And by looking at all of that, you have all of these scientists, you have these anthropologists, archaeologists, paleontologists, who are starting to piece together prehistory. And sometimes these techniques are done together. Sometimes we have writing and we have these technique to try to get a more complete picture. Now I want to end with just a note of caution. Even though we have all of these techniques, we're learning more everyday, our understanding of all that has happened is very very incomplete. And even more, it constantly gets challenged the more we learn. There are things that very serious people believed 50 or 100 years ago that we have now proven to be false. And things that we now take very seriously, it's likely that in 50 or 100 years people might prove some of that wrong. So history, even though it's about the past, it is constantly evolving. We're constantly learning more and we should have a very solid humility about what we know and what we don't know.