If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Solving absolute value inequalities: no solution

Sal solves the inequality |y|+22 ≤ 13.5 to find that it has no solution. Created by Sal Khan and Monterey Institute for Technology and Education.

Want to join the conversation?

  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user Brandon Chen
    Can you put a negative sign outside the absolute value sign?
    (19 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky ultimate style avatar for user Vegapunk
    When Sal says there is no solution, he means, there is no solution in real numbers? its possible exists a solution in complex numbers to solve the inequality?
    (8 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf blue style avatar for user Matthew Daly
      No. Even when we extend the notion of absolute values to the complex numbers, the values never become negative. Just like with the imaginary numbers themselves, you'd have to artificially define a new number with an absolute value of -1 if you thought that finding formal solutions of equations like this were worth having.
      (14 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user michaelkennymorris
    What if the inequality has a negative absolute value, but the variable is greater than? Such as k>-5 Is this still no solution? Because there are positive numbers that are above -5, they're just not -5.
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user ess
    how can I solve double absolute value equations?
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Summaia Raouf
    Hi,
    I would just like to know if there are any practice questions associated with this video. If so, please give me a link. Thanks!
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf blue style avatar for user Melissa
    I can not figure out how to solve an inequality with two numbers outside the absolute value sign. For instance, how would I solve 4|2w+3| - 7< 9?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • orange juice squid orange style avatar for user alainaaa
    Can you make a video explaining how to solve inequalities with the two absolute values on the same side?
    Such as: | x+1 | + | x+1 | less than or equal to 2
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf yellow style avatar for user AV
    I am also having trouble solving an inequality with two absolute value functions. I am not aware of any videos about this topic on Khan Academy therefore I am enquiring as to whether anyone has any websites that explain the methods for solving such inequalities. the website rynkwn suggested has an internal error. the questions i am trying to solve is: find the set of values of x for which | x – 1 | > | 2x – 1 |. one suggested method is squaring both sides...
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user santanu20001999
      As you may have seen from other replies, for solving such problems you have to divide the equation into "regimes", based on the expression(s) of x that are enclosed in absolute value brackets.

      Based on your equation, we have three regimes:
      (i) x >= 1 (ii) 1/2 <= x < 1 (iii) x < 1/2

      For (i): the equation becomes x - 1 > 2x - 1, giving x < 0
      However the assumption was x >= 1. Since the assumption is inconsistent with the solution, x>=1 is not a solution.

      (ii) For this regime, the equation becomes: 1-x > 2x - 1
      This gives the solution x < 2/3; If we combine with our regime assumption, we get the solution set as 1/2 <= x < 2/3

      (iii) For this regime, our equation is: 1 - x > 1 - 2x
      This gives the solution set x > 0. If we combine this with our regime assumption, we get the solution set as: 0 < x < 1/2

      THerefore the final solution set, combining results of (ii) and (iii) is:
      0 < x < 2/3. You can take random values within this regime to make sure the solution set satisfies the inequality.
      (3 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user SA
    What does Sal mean when he says:[a]= x is a non negative number or zero ??
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • orange juice squid orange style avatar for user thebookcat
    What would happen if you have a negative sign outside of the absolute value sign. For example, 4-|8n|= -52.
    You subtract the 4 from both sides and get. -|8n|=-56. Would negative sign next to the absolute value sign change the -52?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

We're told to solve for y, and we have this inequality that says that the absolute value of y plus 22 is less than or equal to 13 and 1/2 or 13.5. So a good place to start is maybe to just isolate the absolute value of y on the left-hand side of this inequality. And the best way to do that, we can subtract 22 from both sides. So let's subtract 22 from both sides. The left-hand side, these guys cancel out, that was the whole point, so you're just left with the absolute value of y as being less than or equal to. And then 13.5 minus 22, let me do it over here, 13.5 minus 22. My brain imagines, or the way I process it is, I say, well-- I always like to put the larger number first-- I say that's the negative of 22 minus 13.5. And 22 minus 14 is 8, or the difference between 22 and 14 is 8, so the difference between 22 and 13 and 1/2 is going to be 1/2 more than that. So this is going to be 8.5. So it's going to be negative 8.5. So we get the absolute value of y is less than or equal to negative 8.5. Now, this should cause you some pause, because when you take the absolute value of anything, what do you know you're going to get? If I tell you that the absolute value of any number, oh, we'll just say the absolute value of a is equal to x. What do you know about x? You know that x is non-negative. It's either a positive number or 0. Here we're saying that y is, when we take the absolute value, has to be less than or equal to a negative number. It's saying that it has to be a negative number. This is implicitly saying that the absolute value of y has to be negative. It not only has to be negative, it has to be less than or equal to negative 8.5. We know that if you take the absolute value of anything, you're going to get 0 or a positive number. You're going to get a non-negative number. There's no number you can put here whose absolute value's going to give you a negative number, especially one less than negative 8.5. So there is no solution to this problem. You cannot find a y that will satisfy this. So there is no solution.