8th grade (Eureka Math/EngageNY)
Course: 8th grade (Eureka Math/EngageNY) > Unit 1Lesson 2: Topic B: Magnitude and scientific notation
- Scientific notation examples
- Scientific notation example: 0.0000000003457
- Scientific notation
- Multiplying in scientific notation example
- Multiplying & dividing in scientific notation
- Multiplying three numbers in scientific notation
- Multiplying & dividing in scientific notation
- Subtracting in scientific notation
- Adding & subtracting in scientific notation
- Simplifying in scientific notation challenge
- Scientific notation word problem: red blood cells
- Scientific notation word problem: U.S. national debt
- Scientific notation word problem: speed of light
- Scientific notation word problems
- Scientific notation review
Scientific notation example: 0.0000000003457
Can you imagine if you had to do calculations with very, very small numbers? How would you handle all those zeros to the right of the decimal? Thank goodness for scientific notation! Created by Sal Khan and Monterey Institute for Technology and Education.
Want to join the conversation?
- is there a concept for this?(74 votes)
- Chemistry and physics use large numbers and this format helps us deal with large and small numbers.(105 votes)
- Is there any short variant for writing 100000000000000000005000000000000000 in scientific notation?(9 votes)
- Counting Zeroes... clunk
Here lies 100 decillion 5 quadrillion in its natural habitat. How do we simplify this dinosaur? Like in word form, one could split the numbers apart, so in scientific notation, we could also split the numbers apart. Here we have 100 decillion 5 quadrillion with its liver a-chopped and innards askew.
(1•10^35) + (5•10^15)
Something of that sort, should be fine and dandy. Hope this helps! :-)(64 votes)
- Hi, I have a question, I was doing practice on Khan Academy site. There was a question 52 thousandths, which I have to turn in scientific notation, I answered 5.2x10^4 because I know 52000 has 3 zeros and I also add 2, so it gave me 10^4 but I was shocked it is incorrect, but why? Can anyone tell me?(20 votes)
- Well the answer will be 5.2*10^-2. Because you have written thousandths not thousands. Both are very different. thousands are on the left side of the decimals but thousandths will be on the right side of the decimal. By the was 52 thousandths will be 0.052(6 votes)
- Is there any application for scientific notation?(2 votes)
- Yes, there is! When dealing with big and long numbers, it can really be a pain writing out all of them, this is when scientific notation helps out! For example it will be really hard to write 300000000000, so we write it like 3•10^11(13 votes)
- Is there anywhere in the real world that we would use scientific notation other then a math worksheet?(3 votes)
- Sure... many sciences deal with very large and very small numbers. Some examples would be: distances between planets or solar systems, the size of small things like atoms, etc. These numbers may have too many digits for calculators to display. Scientific notation is needed in those situations. And, calculators will sometimes give results in scientific notation when you input a calculation that results in a number to large to display.(6 votes)
- Is there an algorithm for this?(3 votes)
- Technically what Nathan said is true, what the video explained has an "algorithm" to find "this'. Nathan just restated... etc(3 votes)
- how do you convert an ending equation like 3.05 x 10^5 back to scientific notation though?(0 votes)
- Your number is already in scientific notation.
Do you mean how do you go back to standard notation? If yes, you just need to shift the decimal point. The 10^5 means you are multiplying by 5 instances of 10. Each 10 shifts the decimal point 1 place to the right (you get a bigger number). Since there are 5 10's, shift the decimal point 5 places to the right and you get 305000 or 305,000
If the exponent had been negative 5, then you are essentially dividing by 5 tens and the decimal point will shift left (creating a smaller number).
Hope this helps.(9 votes)
- Does it always have to be a decimal or can it be like 32 * 10^2 instead of 3.2 * 10^3?(2 votes)
- The number can never exceed 10, so it would be wrong to use 32 instead of 3.2. That being said, you can still have it as whole numbers that are less than ten. For example, 300 would turn into 3 * 10^2.(3 votes)
- Hey, i have a question. i understood whats the meaning of "thousandths" but there was something like that
i tried to write it. firstly, i thought 19 hundred can be 190 or 0.19 then i took that 190.. so then, it had to be 0.190 cause of thousandths. when i looked the answer, seriously it was so complicated. english isnt my main language but in this video, its not mention these ^^molds. i want to learn how its changing when we adding something or when we remove some number from that.
thanks for read.(3 votes)
- do you have a video with multiplying scientific notations?(2 votes)
- I always get super confused if I try and be fancy with multiplying scientific notations. What I always do is FIRST change both numbers to standard form, multiply them, THEN change the answer back to scientific notation.(2 votes)
Express 0.0000000003457 in scientific notation. So let's just remind ourselves what it means to be in scientific notation. Scientific notation will be some number times some power of 10 where this number right here-- let me write it this way. It's going to be greater than or equal to 1, and it's going to be less than 10. So over here, what we want to put here is what that leading number is going to be. And in general, you're going to look for the first non-zero digit. And this is the number that you're going to want to start off with. This is the only number you're going to want to put ahead of or I guess to the left of the decimal point. So we could write 3.457, and it's going to be multiplied by 10 to something. Now let's think about what we're going to have to multiply it by. To go from 3.457 to this very, very small number, from 3.457, to get to this, you have to move the decimal to the left a bunch. You have to add a bunch of zeroes to the left of the 3. You have to keep moving the decimal over to the left. To do that, we're essentially making the number much much, much smaller. So we're not going to multiply it by a positive exponent of 10. We're going to multiply it times a negative exponent of 10. The equivalent is you're dividing by a positive exponent of 10. And so the best way to think about it, when you move an exponent one to the left, you're dividing by 10, which is equivalent to multiplying by 10 to the negative 1 power. Let me give you example here. So if I have 1 times 10 is clearly just equal to 10. 1 times 10 to the negative 1, that's equal to 1 times 1/10, which is equal to 1/10. 1 times-- and let me actually write a decimal, which is equal to 0-- let me actually-- I skipped a step right there. Let me add 1 times 10 to the 0, so we have something natural. So this is one times 10 to the first. One times 10 to the 0 is equal to 1 times 1, which is equal to 1. 1 times 10 to the negative 1 is equal to 1/10, which is equal to 0.1. If I do 1 times 10 to the negative 2, 10 to the negative 2 is 1 over 10 squared or 1/100. So this is going to be 1/100, which is 0.01. What's happening here? When I raise it to a negative 1 power, I've essentially moved the decimal from to the right of the 1 to the left of the 1. I've moved it from there to there. When I raise it to the negative 2, I moved it two over to the left. So how many times are we going to have to move it over to the left to get this number right over here? So let's think about how many zeroes we have. So we have to move it one time just to get in front of the 3. And then we have to move it that many more times to get all of the zeroes in there so that we have to move it one time to get the 3. So if we started here, we're going to move 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 times. So this is going to be 3.457 times 10 to the negative 10 power. Let me just rewrite it. So 3.457 times 10 to the negative 10 power. So in general, what you want to do is you want to find the first non-zero number here. Remember, you want a number here that's between 1 and 10. And it can be equal to 1, but it has to be less than 10. 3.457 definitely fits that bill. It's between 1 and 10. And then you just want to count the leading zeroes between the decimal and that number and include the number because that tells you how many times you have to shift the decimal over to actually get this number up here. And so we have to shift this decimal 10 times to the left to get this thing up here.