Main content

## Algebra 1

### Unit 14: Lesson 7

Completing the square intro- Completing the square
- Worked example: Completing the square (intro)
- Completing the square (intro)
- Worked example: Rewriting expressions by completing the square
- Worked example: Rewriting & solving equations by completing the square
- Completing the square (intermediate)

© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# Completing the square

Some quadratic expressions can be factored as perfect squares. For example, x²+6x+9=(x+3)². However, even if an expression isn't a perfect square, we can turn it into one by adding a constant number. For example, x²+6x+5 isn't a perfect square, but if we add 4 we get (x+3)². This, in essence, is the method of *completing the square*. Created by Sal Khan and CK-12 Foundation.

## Want to join the conversation?

- He is missing a lot of steps in his work.(6 votes)
- Why did he say that we needed a a number times 2 to equal -3 (it was around8:30)?(3 votes)
- hii thank u for the video but i wanna ask why do we write plus or minus when we are doing the square root part at10:45,why can't we just neglect it?(1 vote)
- Quadratic equation have 2 solutions / roots. If you don't use both the positive and negative square root, then you will only find 1 of the solutions.(5 votes)

- Why is
**bx**from**ax^2+bx+c=0**omitted in final answer, by this I mean, how is**ax^2+bx+c***factorised*into a binomial when*completing the square*?

I'm trying to figure out my own equation`x^2+4x+1`

x^2+4x=-1

then add *(b/2)^2* to both sides

x^2+4x+**2^2**=-1+**2^2**

So, then, how is it factorised from here to become

(x+2)^2=3

Please explain to me like I'm five:)(2 votes)- When you factor anything, you don't see the original value in the factors. For example, factors of 144 = 12^2. Where are the 4's? You only see them after multiplying.

The same is true with x^2+4x+4. In factored form it is (x+2)^2. You can confirm these factors are correct by multiplying the 2 binomials.

(x+2)(x+2) = x^2+2x+2x+4

Combine the 2 middle terms and you get x^2+4x+4

Hope this helps.(3 votes)

- So basically completing the square and the quadratic formula go hand in hand in a way? You can solve working through either way with the same squaring concepts?(3 votes)
- Exactly correct. There are certain problems where completing the square can become extremely hard and almost tedious. This comes whereas simply using the quadratic formula allows you to plug-in numbers and come to the value.(1 vote)

- So, what is the difference between the Quadratic Equation presented here:

x^2 + 2ax + a^2 = 0

and the Quadratic Equation presented in my textbook:

ax^2 + bx + c = 0

Are they the same thing? It seems so because the answer/solution set seems to come out to be the same. But I was wondering if there is a way to explain why/how they are the same. Either way, Sal's explanation of the concepts here blows the textbook away. This is especially true because the Quadratic Equation Sal presents actually makes sense in explaining why you need to square half the coefficient of x and plug it in to both sides of the equation. The textbook makes no attempt to explain why it makes sense to do that at all. All "how" but no "why". Whereas Sal gives the "how" and the "why".(2 votes) - At6:15Sal says that you could take the longer approach and solve it by grouping. Can someone show me what that would look like?(3 votes)
- How do you know when to apply completing the square to solving a problem? I know how to complete the square but I never recognize when to do so.(1 vote)
- Completing the square works well if:

- The coefficient of the x² term is 1

- The coefficient of the x term is even.

Before attempting to complete the square, you should first try to solve it by factoring. If you can't solve it by factoring and both the conditions I've listed above are true, then completing the square is probably the best method. If you can't solve by factoring and either of the conditions I've listed above aren't true, then you'll probably want to use the quadratic formula.(4 votes)

- this video makes no sense can someone pleeeeaaaaaasssseeeeeee help me?!(2 votes)
- Between2:04to2:10, May i understand why a=-2. i thought it would be 2 instead since were equating -4x to -2ax.(2 votes)
- I think Sal made a mistake. But 2^2 and (-2)^2 are both 4, so the result was correct.(2 votes)

## Video transcript

In this video, I'm going to show
you a technique called completing the square. And what's neat about this is
that this will work for any quadratic equation, and it's
actually the basis for the quadratic formula. And in the next video or the
video after that I'll prove the quadratic formula using
completing the square. But before we do that, we
need to understand even what it's all about. And it really just builds off
of what we did in the last video, where we solved
quadratics using perfect squares. So let's say I have the
quadratic equation x squared minus 4x is equal to 5. And I put this big space
here for a reason. In the last video, we saw
that these can be pretty straightforward to solve if
the left-hand side is a perfect square. You see, completing the square
is all about making the quadratic equation into a
perfect square, engineering it, adding and subtracting from
both sides so it becomes a perfect square. So how can we do that? Well, in order for this
left-hand side to be a perfect square, there has to be
some number here. There has to be some number here
that if I have my number squared I get that number, and
then if I have two times my number I get negative 4. Remember that, and I
think it'll become clear with a few examples. I want x squared minus 4x plus
something to be equal to x minus a squared. We don't know what a
is just yet, but we know a couple of things. When I square things-- so this
is going to be x squared minus 2a plus a squared. So if you look at this pattern
right here, that has to be-- sorry, x squared minus 2ax--
this right here has to be 2ax. And this right here would
have to be a squared. So this number, a is going to
be half of negative 4, a has to be negative 2, right? Because 2 times a is going
to be negative 4. a is negative 2, and if a is
negative 2, what is a squared? Well, then a squared is going
to be positive 4. And this might look all
complicated to you right now, but I'm showing you
the rationale. You literally just look at this
coefficient right here, and you say, OK, well what's
half of that coefficient? Well, half of that coefficient
is negative 2. So we could say a is equal to
negative 2-- same idea there-- and then you square it. You square a, you
get positive 4. So we add positive 4 here. Add a 4. Now, from the very first
equation we ever did, you should know that you can never
do something to just one side of the equation. You can't add 4 to just one
side of the equation. If x squared minus 4x was equal
to 5, then when I add 4 it's not going to be
equal to 5 anymore. It's going to be equal
to 5 plus 4. We added 4 on the left-hand side
because we wanted this to be a perfect square. But if you add something to the
left-hand side, you've got to add it to the right-hand
side. And now, we've gotten ourselves
to a problem that's just like the problems we
did in the last video. What is this left-hand side? Let me rewrite the
whole thing. We have x squared minus 4x
plus 4 is equal to 9 now. All we did is add 4 to both
sides of the equation. But we added 4 on purpose so
that this left-hand side becomes a perfect square. Now what is this? What number when I multiply it
by itself is equal to 4 and when I add it to itself I'm
equal to negative 2? Well, we already answered
that question. It's negative 2. So we get x minus 2 times
x minus 2 is equal to 9. Or we could have skipped this
step and written x minus 2 squared is equal to 9. And then you take the square
root of both sides, you get x minus 2 is equal to
plus or minus 3. Add 2 to both sides, you get x
is equal to 2 plus or minus 3. That tells us that x could be
equal to 2 plus 3, which is 5. Or x could be equal to 2 minus
3, which is negative 1. And we are done. Now I want to be very clear. You could have done this without
completing the square. We could've started off
with x squared minus 4x is equal to 5. We could have subtracted 5 from
both sides and gotten x squared minus 4x minus
5 is equal to 0. And you could say, hey, if I
have a negative 5 times a positive 1, then their product
is negative 5 and their sum is negative 4. So I could say this is x
minus 5 times x plus 1 is equal to 0. And then we would say that x is
equal to 5 or x is equal to negative 1. And in this case, this actually
probably would have been a faster way to
do the problem. But the neat thing about the
completing the square is it will always work. It'll always work no matter what
the coefficients are or no matter how crazy
the problem is. And let me prove it to you. Let's do one that traditionally
would have been a pretty painful problem if
we just tried to do it by factoring, especially if we
did it using grouping or something like that. Let's say we had 10x squared
minus 30x minus 8 is equal to 0. Now, right from the get-go, you
could say, hey look, we could maybe divide
both sides by 2. That does simplify
a little bit. Let's divide both sides by 2. So if you divide everything
by 2, what do you get? We get 5x squared minus 15x
minus 4 is equal to 0. But once again, now we have this
crazy 5 in front of this coefficent and we would have to
solve it by grouping which is a reasonably painful
process. But we can now go straight to
completing the square, and to do that I'm now going to divide
by 5 to get a 1 leading coefficient here. And you're going to see why this
is different than what we've traditionally done. So if I divide this whole thing
by 5, I could have just divided by 10 from the get-go
but I wanted to go to this the step first just to show
you that this really didn't give us much. Let's divide everything by 5. So if you divide everything by
5, you get x squared minus 3x minus 4/5 is equal to 0. So, you might say, hey, why did
we ever do that factoring by grouping? If we can just always divide by
this leading coefficient, we can get rid of that. We can always turn this into a 1
or a negative 1 if we divide by the right number. But notice, by doing that we
got this crazy 4/5 here. So this is super hard to do
just using factoring. You'd have to say, what two
numbers when I take the product is equal to
negative 4/5? It's a fraction and when I take
their sum, is equal to negative 3? This is a hard problem
with factoring. This is hard using factoring. So, the best thing to do is to
use completing the square. So let's think a little bit
about how we can turn this into a perfect square. What I like to do-- and you'll
see this done some ways and I'll show you both ways because
you'll see teachers do it both ways-- I like to get
the 4/5 on the other side. So let's add 4/5 to both
sides of this equation. You don't have to do it this
way, but I like to get the 4/5 out of the way. And then what do we get
if we add 4/5 to both sides of this equation? The left-hand hand side of the
equation just becomes x squared minus 3x,
no 4/5 there. I'm going to leave a little
bit of space. And that's going to
be equal to 4/5. Now, just like the last problem,
we want to turn this left-hand side into the perfect
square of a binomial. How do we do that? Well, we say, well, what number
times 2 is equal to negative 3? So some number times
2 is negative 3. Or we essentially just take
negative 3 and divide it by 2, which is negative 3/2. And then we square
negative 3/2. So in the example, we'll
say a is negative 3/2. And if we square negative
3/2, what do we get? We get positive 9/4. I just took half of this
coefficient, squared it, got positive 9/4. The whole purpose of doing that
is to turn this left-hand side into a perfect square. Now, anything you do to one side
of the equation, you've got to do to the other side. So we added a 9/4 here, let's
add a 9/4 over there. And what does our
equation become? We get x squared minus 3x plus
9/4 is equal to-- let's see if we can get a common
denominator. So, 4/5 is the same
thing as 16/20. Just multiply the numerator
and denominator by 4. Plus over 20. 9/4 is the same thing
if you multiply the numerator by 5 as 45/20. And so what is 16 plus 45? You see, this is kind of getting
kind of hairy, but that's the fun, I guess, of completing the square sometimes. 16 plus 45. See that's 55, 61. So this is equal to 61/20. So let me just rewrite it. x squared minus 3x plus
9/4 is equal to 61/20. Crazy number. Now this, at least on
the left hand side, is a perfect square. This is the same thing as
x minus 3/2 squared. And it was by design. Negative 3/2 times negative
3/2 is positive 9/4. Negative 3/2 plus negative 3/2
is equal to negative 3. So this squared is
equal to 61/20. We can take the square root of
both sides and we get x minus 3/2 is equal to the positive
or the negative square root of 61/20. And now, we can add 3/2 to both
sides of this equation and you get x is equal to
positive 3/2 plus or minus the square root of 61/20. And this is a crazy number and
it's hopefully obvious you would not have been able to-- at
least I would not have been able to-- get to this number
just by factoring. And if you want their actual
values, you can get your calculator out. And then let me clear
all of this. And 3/2-- let's do the plus
version first. So we want to do 3 divided by 2 plus the
second square root. We want to pick that little
yellow square root. So the square root of 61 divided
by 20, which is 3.24. This crazy 3.2464, I'll
just write 3.246. So this is approximately equal
to 3.246, and that was just the positive version. Let's do the subtraction
version. So we can actually put our
entry-- if you do second and then entry, that we want that
little yellow entry, that's why I pressed the
second button. So I press enter, it puts in
what we just put, we can just change the positive or the
addition to a subtraction and you get negative 0.246. So you get negative 0.246. And you can actually verify
that these satisfy our original equation. Our original equation
was up here. Let me just verify
for one of them. So the second answer on your
graphing calculator is the last answer you use. So if you use a variable answer,
that's this number right here. So if I have my answer squared--
I'm using answer represents negative 0.24. Answer squared minus 3 times
answer minus 4/5-- 4 divided by 5-- it equals--. And this just a little
bit of explanation. This doesn't store the entire
number, it goes up to some level of precision. It stores some number
of digits. So when it calculated it using
this stored number right here, it got 1 times 10 to
the negative 14. So that is 0.0000. So that's 13 zeroes
and then a 1. A decimal, then 13
zeroes and a 1. So this is pretty much 0. Or actually, if you got the
exact answer right here, if you went through an infinite
level of precision here, or maybe if you kept it in this
radical form, you would get that it is indeed equal to 0. So hopefully you found that
helpful, this whole notion of completing the square. Now we're going to extend it
to the actual quadratic formula that we can use, we
can essentially just plug things into to solve any
quadratic equation.