- Sequences intro
- Intro to arithmetic sequences
- Intro to arithmetic sequences
- Extending arithmetic sequences
- Extend arithmetic sequences
- Using arithmetic sequences formulas
- Intro to arithmetic sequence formulas
- Worked example: using recursive formula for arithmetic sequence
- Use arithmetic sequence formulas
Intro to arithmetic sequence formulas
Get comfortable with the basics of explicit and recursive formulas for arithmetic sequences.
Before taking this lesson, make sure you know the basics of arithmetic sequences and have some experience with evaluating functions and function domain.
What is a formula?
We are used to describing arithmetic sequences like this:
But there are other ways. In this lesson, we'll be learning two new ways to represent arithmetic sequences: recursive formulas and explicit formulas. Formulas give us instructions on how to find any term of a sequence.
To remain general, formulas use to represent any term number and to represent the term of the sequence. For example, here are the first few terms of the arithmetic sequence 3, 5, 7, ...
|(The term number)||(The term)|
We mentioned above that formulas give us instructions on how to find any term of a sequence. Now we can rephrase this as follows: formulas tell us how to find for any possible .
Check your understanding
1) Find in the sequence 3, 5, 7, ...
2) For any term number , what does represent?
Recursive formulas of arithmetic sequences
Recursive formulas give us two pieces of information:
- The first term of a sequence
- The pattern rule to get any term in a sequence from the term that comes before it
Here is the recursive formula of our sequence 3, 5, 7, ... along with the interpretation for each part.
In order to find the fifth term, for example, we need to extend the sequence term by term:
Cool! This formula gives us the same sequence as described by 3, 5, 7, ...
Check your understanding
Now it's your turn to find terms of sequences using their recursive formulas.
Just as we used to represent the term of the sequence 3, 5, 7, ..., we can use other letters to represent other sequences. For example, we can use , , or .
3) Find in the sequence given by
4) Find in the sequence given by
5) Find in the sequence given by
Explicit formulas of arithmetic sequences
Here is an explicit formula of 3, 5, 7, ...
This formula allows us to simply plug in the number of the term we are interested in to get the value of that term.
In order to find the fifth term, for example, we need to plug into the explicit formula.
Lo and behold, we get the same result as before!
Check your understanding
6) Find in the sequence given by .
7) Find in the sequence given by .
8) Find in the sequence given by .
Sequences are functions
Notice that the formulas we used in this lesson work like functions: We input a term number , and the formula outputs the value of that term .
Sequences are in fact defined as functions. However, cannot be any real number value. There's no such thing as the negative fifth term or the 0.4th term of a sequence.
This means that the domain of sequences—which is the set of all possible inputs of the function—is the positive integers.
A note about notation
We've been writing , for example, to represent the fourth term, but other sources sometimes write .
Both notations are fine to use. We prefer because it emphasizes that sequences are functions.
9) Which type of formula is more useful for quickly finding the 100th term of an arithmetic sequence?
10) The explicit formula of an arithmetic sequence is .
Which term of the sequence is equal to -65?
Want to join the conversation?
- If explicit formulas of the sequence are easier to find the 100th term of a sequence (based on the reflection question), why would we need recursive formulas? When are they useful?(16 votes)
- You are right, We can do any sequence with explicit form just as easily as with recursive. They just wanted to make sure we knew that you can use both.(12 votes)
- I have a question about your opinion on notation. So I am currently teaching this concept and after seeing this, I feel my students would have felt so much more comfortable using the notation you have as representing the arithmetic sequence as a function. The book we use uses asubn notation. Do you think there is a reason to use one notation over the other?(13 votes)
- Certainly 𝑎(𝑛) helps tie in to functions.
The only other practical consideration I can think of is that if a majority of mathematicians, books, websites, etc. use 𝑎ₙ then they should be familiar with it. But I don't know which is more common.(11 votes)
- I feel like a robot using the explicit formula. Why on earth does it work? It seems phony, since we are always given the formulas that define the sequence in each exercise. How does one arrive to such formula?(6 votes)
- Think y=mx+b. Recognize that the constant common difference is "m" and the term before the initial value is "b"(14 votes)
- what is difference between explicit formula and recursiue formula because both equation looks similar jus we changed the side of our common difference d.
i mean a(n)=a+(n-1)D or a(n)=a+D(n-1)
we just changed the side of D .
SO are they similar?(4 votes)
- Actually the explicit formula for an arithmetic sequence is a(n)=a+(n-1)*D, and the recursive formula is a(n) = a(n-1) + D (instead of a(n)=a+D(n-1)).
The difference is than an explicit formula gives the nth term of the sequence as a function of n alone, whereas a recursive formula gives the nth term of a sequence as a function of the previous term(s) of the sequence (and sometimes of n as well). In other words, an explicit formula tells how to calculate directly the nth term of a sequence, whereas a recursive formula tells how to get from one or more terms of the sequence to the next term.
Have a blessed, wonderful day!(16 votes)
- In problem seven it gives the problem Find c(8) in the sequence given by c(n)= 20-17(n-1) okay so how would i solve that problem i thought that you multiplied 17 by 17 and then subtracted it by 20 but when you click on the help button it says
So my question is how they got the 17*7 and not 17*17(10 votes)
- Because of the 8-1=7 and then you do 17*7 to get 119 and then subtract 119 from 20 to get -99(4 votes)
- How are recursive formulas still functions? The second part of the recursive formula seems to me like using a word in that word's definition (because the letter used to show the function is used in the definition of the function, if that makes sense...?).(4 votes)
- A function specifies a relationship between two variables. While a recursive formula does use itself to sequence back to its initial value, the result is still specifying the relationship between two variables.
Also notice that one can change arithmetic sequences to recursive formulas and vice versa. Both are functions.
Recursion itself, whether in math or in other places such as computer programming, can be a very different way of looking at a problem. Recursion is not limited to mathematics, but that's a whole different topic all together.(7 votes)
- Is a(n) more confusing than "a" sub "n"?
It makes me think "a multiplied to n" sometimes.(5 votes)
- a_n (which is a sub n) typically means the nth term of a sequence. It can also be found in the definition of the sequence.
a(n) (a of n) is definitely less used; if one wanted to define the sequence as a function, one would use f(n) or even f(x).(4 votes)
- I still don't understand what you mean. I tried clicking 'I need help' but that didn't explain it well enough for me to understand(3 votes)
- Don't understand what? Mabye I could help you.(7 votes)
- The sum of the first 7 terms of an A.P. is 63 and the sum of its next 7 terms is 161. Find the 28th term of this A.P.(3 votes)
- assume that the common difference is y and the first term is x, so
x + x + y + x + 2y + x + 3y + x + 4y + x + 5y + x + 6y = 63 which means 7x + 21y = 63
x + 7y + x + 8y + x + 9y + x + 10y + x + 11y + x + 12y + x + 13y = 161 so 7x + 70y = 161, subtract the first equation from the second and get 49y = 98, so y =2 and substitute this into either equation,
7x + 21(2) = 63, 7x = 21, x = 3. x is the first term, and two is the common difference, so f(n) = 2(n-1) + 3. f(28)= 2(27) + 3 = 57.(6 votes)
- If we were to graph this, it would make a line. Since every time we increase 1 term, our nth term increase by a certain amount. This is really a neat concept. But, Sal somewhere else on the topic of sequence said that this won't work all of the time. Can anybody tell me about this "not all of the time".(4 votes)
- The graph for an arithmetic sequence is actually a series of points that would sit on a line. They don't themselves create a line because there are gaps (other values) between the numbers in the sequences.
A graph for a geometric sequence would not look like a line. It would look like an exponential functions (again with gaps for the values not in the sequence).
I hope this answers your question.(3 votes)