Main content

### Course: AP®︎/College Calculus BC > Unit 5

Lesson 7: Determining concavity of intervals and finding points of inflection: algebraic- Analyzing concavity (algebraic)
- Inflection points (algebraic)
- Mistakes when finding inflection points: second derivative undefined
- Mistakes when finding inflection points: not checking candidates
- Analyzing the second derivative to find inflection points
- Analyze concavity
- Find inflection points
- Concavity review
- Inflection points review

© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# Analyzing the second derivative to find inflection points

Learn how the second derivative of a function is used in order to find the function's inflection points. Learn which common mistakes to avoid in the process.

We can find the inflection points of a function by analyzing its second derivative.

## Example: Finding the inflection points of $f(x)={x}^{5}+{\displaystyle \frac{5}{3}}{x}^{4}$

**Step 1: Finding the second derivative**

To find the inflection points of $f$ , we need to use ${f}^{\u2033}$ :

**Step 2: Finding all candidates**

Similar to critical points, these are points where ${f}^{\u2033}(x)=0$ or where ${f}^{\u2033}(x)$ is undefined.

**Step 3: Analyzing concavity**

Interval | Test | Conclusion | |
---|---|---|---|

**Step 4: Finding inflection points**

Now that we know the intervals where $f$ is concave up or down, we can find its inflection points (i.e. where the concavity changes direction).

is concave down before$f$ , concave up after it, and is defined at$x=-1$ . So$x=-1$ has an inflection point at$f$ .$x=-1$ is concave up before$f$ *and after* , so it doesn't have an inflection point there.$x=0$

We can verify our result by looking at the graph of $f$ .

### Common mistake: not checking the candidates

**Remember:**We must not assume that any point where

### Common mistake: not including points where the derivative is undefined

**Remember:**Our candidates for inflection points are points where the second derivative is equal to zero

*points where the second derivative is undefined. Ignoring points where the second derivative is undefined will often result in a wrong answer.*

**and**### Common mistake: looking at the first derivative instead of the second derivative

**Remember**: When looking for inflection points, we must always analyze where the

*second*derivative changes its sign. Doing this for the first derivative will give us relative extremum points, not inflection points.

*Want more practice? Try this exercise.*

## Want to join the conversation?

- weren't you supposed to use chain rule in Olga's calculation to find the derivative of (x-2)^4(1 vote)
- I think, since the derivative of (X-2) is simply just 1 all the time, they don't write it out.

Example:

g(x) = (x-2)^4

g'(x)=4 * (x-2)^3 ***1**<--- Since the derivative of (x-2) is just 1, you don't have to write it out. Did i understand your question correctly?(45 votes)

- So basically the first derivative is for finding extrema, and the second derivative is for finding the concavity, am I right?(4 votes)
- Yep, that's correct!(4 votes)

- If f(x) = ax^4 + bx^2, ab>0, then which of the following is correct:

1. The curve has no horizontal tangents

2. The curve is concave up for all x

3. The curve is concave down for all x

4. The curve has no inflection point

5. None of the preceding is necessarily true(2 votes)- 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑎𝑥⁴ + 𝑏𝑥² ⇒

⇒ 𝑓 '(𝑥) = 4𝑎𝑥³ + 2𝑏𝑥 ⇒

⇒ 𝑓 ''(𝑥) = 12𝑎𝑥² + 2𝑏

𝑓 ''(𝑥) = 0 ⇒ 𝑥² = −𝑏∕(6𝑎), which doesn't have any real number solutions since 𝑎𝑏 > 0 (𝑎 and 𝑏 are either both positive or both negative), and so 𝑓(𝑥) has no inflection points.

Thereby, 𝑓(𝑥) is either always concave up or always concave down, which means that it can only have one local extreme point, and that point must be (0, 0) because 𝑥 = 0 obviously solves 𝑓 '(𝑥) = 0 (which by the way tells us that 𝑓(𝑥) does have a horizontal tangent).

Since the local extremum is 𝑓(0) = 0, all we need to do in order to find the concavity is to check whether 𝑓(𝑥) is positive or negative for any 𝑥 ≠ 0,

for example 𝑥 = 1 ⇒ 𝑓(1) = 𝑎 + 𝑏, which would be positive for 𝑎, 𝑏 > 0 and negative for 𝑎, 𝑏 < 0.

So, without knowing the sign of 𝑎 and 𝑏 we can't tell whether 𝑓(𝑥) is concave up or down.(6 votes)

- why do we have to check our candidates to see if the function is defined at those points?(1 vote)
- NOt checking to see if defined. Checking to see if the candidate is an inflection point. Review the definition of inflection point.(5 votes)

- Could you go over finding the candidate?(1 vote)
- In Common mistake: not checking the candidates It says we should check our candidates to see if the second derivative changes signs at those points and the function is defined at those points. I'm very confused by the wording. If a candidate is not defined in the function, does it still count as a candidate? and why?(1 vote)
- Yes. We could, for example, have a function that's undefined at a point, and is concave-up left of that point and concave-down on the right. Consider the function that returns sin(x) for x≠0, and is undefined at 0.(1 vote)

- How do we find the inflection points when we have a 5 polinomial function(1 vote)
- You can multiply it all and use the power rule like charlie said, you can also use a mix of the power rule and the chain rule when differentiating if the function is in parentheses. It doesn't matter what the intial polynomial is, to find the inflection points you always need to use the second derivative.(1 vote)

- I'm not sure why the following isn't stated more boldly, but unlike with critical points - the original function being undefined at an inflection point doesn't necessarily disqualify it.(1 vote)
- Olga tried to solve an equation step by step.

Find Olga's mistake.

Choose 1 answer:

Choose 1 answer:

(Choice A)

A

(Choice B)

B

(Choice C)

C

(Choice D) Olga did not make a mistake.

D

Olga did not make a mistake.(0 votes) - what is r(56) rjitj[worjwtijgw[otijg[(0 votes)