Main content

### Course: AP®︎/College Statistics > Unit 10

Lesson 3: The idea of significance tests- Idea behind hypothesis testing
- Examples of null and alternative hypotheses
- Writing null and alternative hypotheses
- P-values and significance tests
- Comparing P-values to different significance levels
- Estimating a P-value from a simulation
- Estimating P-values from simulations
- Using P-values to make conclusions

© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# Comparing P-values to different significance levels

Example comparing P-values to different significance levels, and why it's important to set the significance level before a test.

## Want to join the conversation?

- how do we choose significant level? is there anything that we should use to determine whether to choose a significant level of 0.05, 0.01 or any other value?(11 votes)
- Good question!

It is common to use significance level 0.05, but 0.01 is sometimes used. It depends on the type of real-life situation. The statistician would need to evaluate whether or not lowering the significance level in order to decrease the probability of making a Type I error (the error of rejecting H0 when it's actually true) is worth the cost of increasing the probability of making a Type II error (the error of failing to reject H0 when H0 is false).(24 votes)

- Im getting a different p-value of 0.01586... compared to the 0.036 in the video.

Isnt the formula to calculate p-value`(0.5^100) * (100 choose 59)`

And that turns out to be (WolframAlpha Link) : https://bit.ly/2xEnp10(15 votes) - How is the p-value of 0.036 calculated?? time 3.14(10 votes)
- I've tried to calculate that p-value and got different result (0.044313). Here's my question on StackExchange with description of how I got that result: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3795024/how-to-manually-calculate-the-p-value-of-getting-at-least-59-heads-in-100-coin-f

Can anyone help?(4 votes)- n(sample size)=100, p1=.59, p2=.41

st error (of a proportion) = sqrt[(.59)(.41)/100]

z score = (observed-expected rate)/st error

or

z score = (0.59-0.5)/st error = 1.83

Using the z table to look up 1.83 you'll find your answer (will be slightly off because of rounding). You'll have to subtract the looked-up value from 1.(8 votes)

- How do you assume the null hypothesis is true? Do you just say that to yourself? Thanks in advance.(2 votes)
- You ALWAYS assume the null hypothesis is true (for the sake of completing the test). After doing a significance test you reject it or fail to reject it.(4 votes)

- Why does the p-value represent probability of the proportion which is 59% or greater, but not just solely 59%?(3 votes)
- How do you calculate the p-value itself, I didn't find a part in the videos that explained what to actually plug into what equations in this lesson.(3 votes)
- Not a question, just an explanation for those who say that they got a different p-value of 0.01586. The 0.01586 is the probability to get 59 heads in (a sample of) 100 trials. The p-value, however, is the probability of having a sample (consisting of 100 trials) that results in p-hat of 59%. i.e., if we were to have many 100-trial samples, how many of them would have 59% or more heads. For that, see gmbushyeager's calculation below.(3 votes)
- Is there a diagram that shows why we rejected the Ho when P

value is less than significance level for more clarity.(2 votes) - What if my result is p_hat = 40 / 100? I would assume that p-value should be small enough.

Hence, it would reject the null hypotheses, but it definitely does not suggest alternative hypothesis.

What should I say in this case?

Can alternative hypothesis is inverse of null hypothesis? In this case Ha: p != 0.5(2 votes)

## Video transcript

- [Instructor] What we're
going to do in this video is talk about significance
levels which are denoted by the Greek letter alpha and we're gonna talk about two things, the different conclusions you might make based on the different significance levels that you might set and also
why it's important to set your significance levels ahead of time, before you conduct an experiment
and calculate the p-values, for, frankly, ethical purposes. So to help us get this,
let's look at a scenario right over here which tells us Rahim heard that spinning,
rather than flipping, a penny raises the probability above 50% that the penny lands showing heads. That's actually quite
fascinating if that's true. He tested this by spinning
10 different pennies 10 times each, so that would
be a total of a hundred spins. His hypotheses were, his
null hypothesis is that by spinning, your
proportion doesn't change rather versus flipping, it's still 50% and his alternative hypothesis
is that by spinning, your proportion of heads
is greater than 50%, where p is the true proportion of spins that a penny would land showing heads. In his 100 spins, the penny landed showing heads in 59 spins. Rahim calculated that the statistic, so this is the sample proportion here, it's 59 out of a hundred
were heads so that's 0.59 or 59 hundredths, and he calculated had an associated p-value
of approximately 0.036. So based on this scenario,
if ahead of time, Rahim had set his
significance level at 0.05, what conclusions would he now make? And while you're pausing
it, think about how that may or may not have been different if he set his significance
levels ahead of time at 0.01. Pause the video and
try to figure that out. So let's first of all remind ourselves what a p-value even is. You could view it as the probability of getting a sample
proportion at least this large if you assume that the
null hypothesis is true. And if that is low enough, if it's below some threshold, which is our significance level, then we will reject the null hypothesis. And so in this scenario, we do see that 0.036, our p-value
is indeed less than alpha. It is indeed less than 0.05 and because of that, we would
reject the null hypothesis. And in everyday language,
rejecting the null hypothesis is rejecting the notion that
the true proportion of spins that a penny would land
showing heads is 50%. And if you reject your null hypothesis, you could also say that suggests
our alternative hypothesis that the true proportion of spins that a penny would land showing
heads is greater than 50%. Now what about the situation where our significance level was lower? Well in this situation, our p-value, our probability of getting
that sample statistic if we assumed our null
hypothesis were true, in this situation, it's
greater than or equal to, and it's greater than in
this particular situation, than our threshold, than
our significance level. And so here, we would say that we fail to reject our null hypothesis
so we're failing to reject this right over here and
it will not help us suggest our alternative hypothesis. And so because of the difference between what you would conclude given this change in significance levels, that's why it's really important to set these levels ahead of time because you could imagine
it's human nature, if you're a researcher of some kind, you want to have an interesting result. You want to discover something, you want to be able to tell your friends, hey, my alternative hypothesis
it actually is suggested, we can reject the
assumption, the status quo. I found something that
actually makes a difference and so it's very tempting for a researcher to calculate your p-values and then say oh, well maybe no one will notice if I then set my significance values so that it's just high enough so that I can reject my null hypothesis. If you did that, that
would be very unethical. In future videos, we'll start
thinking about the question of okay, if I'm doing it ahead of time, if I'm setting my significance
level ahead of time, how do I decide to set the threshold? When should it be one-hundredths? When should it be five-hundredths? When should it be 10-hundredths? Or when should it be something else?