Main content

### Course: Calculus, all content (2017 edition) > Unit 3

Lesson 17: L'Hôpital's rule- L'Hôpital's rule introduction
- L'Hôpital's rule: limit at 0 example
- L'Hôpital's rule: 0/0
- L'Hôpital's rule: challenging problem
- L'Hôpital's rule: limit at infinity example
- L'Hôpital's rule: solve for a variable
- L’Hôpital’s rule (composite exponential functions)
- L’Hôpital’s rule (composite exponential functions)
- Proof of special case of l'Hôpital's rule
- L'Hôpital's rule review

© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# L'Hôpital's rule: limit at infinity example

Sal uses L'Hôpital's rule to find the limit at infinity of (4x²-5x)/(1-3x²). Created by Sal Khan.

## Want to join the conversation?

- This is just more of a general question, but why doesn't infinity divided by infinity just equal 1?(19 votes)
- Well, one reason is that two quantities could both approach infinity, but not at the same rate. For example imagine the limit of (n+1)/n^2 as n approaches infinity. Both the numerator and the denominator approach infinity, but the denominator approaches infinity much faster than the numerator. So take a very large n, like 1 trillion. The numerator is 1,000,000,000,001. But the denominator is 1 trillion SQUARED. So (n+1)/n^2 for n=1 trillion is .000000000001000000000001. That's very close to zero, not 1. As n gets even bigger, the limit of (n+1)/n^2 approaches even closer to 0.(49 votes)

- at1:04when Sal says to evaluate for infinity, does it matter if it comes out as infinity/infinity or pos. infinity/ neg. infinity in order for l'hopitals rule to still apply?(17 votes)
**L'Hopital's**rule can be applied in all cases of indeterminate forms which include 0/0, infinity / infinity, (infinity) /(-infinity) and

(-infinity) / (infinity).(33 votes)

- Sal my teacher told me a short cut. If f(x) is a approaching a infinity and the powers are the same (ex. 4x^2/3x^2)then the coefficients become what the limit approaches. Without even factoring you can tell that the answer is going to be 4/3. Does that work all the time?

Also thank you. I learned someone awesome in this video. :) As usual.(14 votes)- The first time he introduced limits approaching infinity, that was the way he did it.(27 votes)

- How do we know, when are we supposed to use L'hopital's rule????

and when just normal limit??

How many times do i have to make :'hopital's rule, to get the result?? (in this harder cases?) Coz i can just make again and again, and what if i dont get the result?(10 votes)- L'hopital's rule is just one of many different methods to get the result for a limit. If you see you are not getting results with it, try another approach. There is no way to tell the best way to solve an limit, that's just trial and error.(16 votes)

- Sal used L'Hopital's Rule twice. I solved the question by using L'Hopital's Rule once.

When I apply the limit (as x approaches infinity) to the derivative (8x-5) / (-6x) at2:03, I know that "-5" is negligible when x reaches infinitely large values. That leaves (8x) / (-6x), which is scaling at the rate of 8 / -6, or 4 / -3. Hence, the answer to the question asked.

Can somebody please confirm if my approach is correct? Thank you!(7 votes)- It is correct. You did what Sal said at the begining of the vidieo about already knowing how to get the limit. While your way is correct, Sal only continued taking L'Hopital's rule one step further to get the same result.(7 votes)

- another easy way to find the limit is to take the number beside high the variables with the highest power. 4x^2/-3x^2==== -4/3(10 votes)
- at2:47Sal says that "It doesn't matter what value this [limit] is approaching." I'm not sure I understand how that could be? The fraction would not be there at any point besides infinity, because otherwise it wouldn't be indeterminate, to my thinking. Or am I just reading too much into it? Thanks.(2 votes)
- At that point in the analysis, we're looking at the limit of a constant as x goes to infinity, and Sal is making the point that a constant will always have the same value no matter what limit we're approaching. He isn't saying that the specific limit (infinity) is irrelevant to the overall problem, but just noting that once you've got a constant you're done and don't have to worry about the limit any more.(10 votes)

- Hey!! I am learning sooooo much more from these presentations than I do in my lectures.... can we also us this rule to find the vertical and horizontal asymptotes? how do we use it from the + and - sides?(4 votes)
- I see the relationship you're foreseeing, since both deal with the slope of functions where values zero and infinity occur. For horizontal asymptotes, I suspect you may be right, that L'Hopital's Rule can help us find the value f(x) for which the slope approaches 0.

However, I don't believe the two are related when it comes to vertical asymptotes, since these deal with slopes of**undefined**forms (e.g., 5/0 or the general form n/0), not of indeterminate form (i.e., 0/0 or infinity / infinity).

Hope this helps!

Also, if you'd like a general review of horizontal and vertical asymptotes, you can watch the video below (although it's rather long, at 20 minutes, I'm sure you can parse through it).

http://tinyurl.com/qxwpcu7(2 votes)

- Hi. This question may be way off, but when we are calculating the derivative for (4x^2-5x)/(1-3x^2), why are we not using the quotient rule?(2 votes)
- You're applying L'Hopital's rule to calculate the
*limit*at infinity. You're not interested in the derivative of this function (in which case, yes, the quotient rule can be used).(6 votes)

- I would also have said that when x approaches to infinity, the two quadratic terms go to infinity much faster than the linear term. So -5x will become negligible compared to 4x^2, 1 of course is negligible and so we have 4x^2/(-3x^2) which is exactly -4/3.(4 votes)

## Video transcript

We need to evaluate the limit,
as x approaches infinity, of 4x squared minus 5x, all of that
over 1 minus 3x squared. So infinity is kind
of a strange number. You can't just plug in infinity
and see what happens. But if you wanted to evaluate
this limit, what you might try to do is just evaluate-- if you
want to find the limit as this numerator approaches infinity,
you put in really large numbers there, and you're going to see
that it approaches infinity. That the numerator
approaches infinity as x approaches infinity. And if you put really large
numbers in the denominator, you're going to see
that that also-- well, not quite infinity. 3x squared will approach
infinity, but we're subtracting it. If you subtract infinity from
some non-infinite number, it's going to be negative infinity. So if you were to just kind
of evaluate it at infinity, the numerator, you would
get positive infinity. The denominator, you would
get negative infinity. So I'll write it like this. Negative infinity. And that's one of the
indeterminate forms that L'Hopital's Rule
can be applied to. And you're probably saying,
hey, Sal, why are we even using L'Hopital's Rule? I know how to do this
without L'Hopital's Rule. And you probably
do, or you should. And we'll do that in a second. But I just wanted to show you
that L'Hopital's Rule also works for this type of problem,
and I really just wanted to show you an example that had a
infinity over negative or positive infinity
indeterminate form. But let's apply
L'Hopital's Rule here. So if this limit exists, or if
the limit of their derivatives exist, then this limit's going
to be equal to the limit as x approaches infinity of the
derivative of the numerator. So the derivative of the
numerator is-- the derivative of 4x squared is 8x minus 5
over-- the derivative of the denominator is, well,
derivative of 1 is 0. Derivative of negative 3x
squared is negative 6x. And once again, when you
evaluated infinity, the numerator is going to
approach infinity. And the denominator is
approaching negative infinity. Negative 6 times infinity
is negative infinity. So this is negative infinity. So let's apply
L'Hopital's Rule again. So if the limit of these guys'
derivatives exist-- or the rational function of the
derivative of this guy divided by the derivative of that guy--
if that exists, then this limit's going to be equal to
the limit as x approaches infinity of-- arbitrarily
switch colors-- derivative of 8x minus 5 is just 8. Derivative of negative
6x is negative 6. And this is just going to be--
this is just a constant here. So it doesn't matter what limit
you're approaching, this is just going to equal this value. Which is what? If we put it in lowest
common form, or simplified form, it's negative 4/3. So this limit exists. This was an indeterminate form. And the limit of this
function's derivative over this function's derivative exists,
so this limit must also equal negative 4/3. And by that same argument,
that limit also must be equal to negative 4/3. And for those of you who
say, hey, we already knew how to do this. We could just factor
out an x squared. You are absolutely right. And I'll show you
that right here. Just to show you that it's
not the only-- you know, L'Hopital's Rule is not
the only game in town. And frankly, for this type of
problem, my first reaction probably wouldn't have been to
use L'Hopital's Rule first. You could have said that that
first limit-- so the limit as x approaches infinity of 4x
squared minus 5x over 1 minus 3x squared is equal to the
limit as x approaches infinity. Let me draw a little line here,
to show you that this is equal to that, not to this
thing over here. This is equal to the limit
as x approaches infinity. Let's factor out an x squared
out of the numerator and the denominator. So you have an x squared
times 4 minus 5 over x. Right? x squared times 5
over x is going to be 5x. Divided by-- let's factor out
an x out of the numerator. So x squared times 1
over x squared minus 3. And then these x
squareds cancel out. So this is going to be equal
to the limit as x approaches infinity of 4 minus 5 over x
over 1 over x squared minus 3. And what's this going
to be equal to? Well, as x approaches
infinity-- 5 divided by infinity-- this term
is going to be 0. Super duper infinitely
large denominator, this is going to be 0. That is going to approach 0. And same argument. This right here is
going to approach 0. All you're left with is
a 4 and a negative 3. So this is going to be
equal to negative 4 over a negative 3, or negative 4/3. So you didn't have to do
use L'Hopital's Rule for this problem.