- Proof: Differentiability implies continuity
- Justifying the power rule
- Proof of power rule for positive integer powers
- Proof of power rule for square root function
- Limit of sin(x)/x as x approaches 0
- Limit of (1-cos(x))/x as x approaches 0
- Proof of the derivative of sin(x)
- Proof of the derivative of cos(x)
- Product rule proof
Justifying the power rule
Before actually proving the power rule, Sal shows why the power rule makes sense by considering the derivatives of x¹ and x². Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- when we say slope =4 what do we actually mean? Because when I think of slope I think of degrees(17 votes)
- When I think of slope, I think of rise/run. You may remember hearing your teacher say "rise over run". For slope = 4, I think to myself slope = 4 = rise/run = 4/1. That tells me for every 4 units up, I go over 1.(6 votes)
- How about if there was a square root of x as the denominator of a fraction? For example: f(x) = 1/√x *Please help, and thank you : ) *(7 votes)
- When taking the derivative of √x, it's a good idea to rewrite it as √x = x^(1/2). So when you have 1/√x, you would write it as x^(-1/2). Now you can just use the power rule:
Derivative of 1/√x = Derivative of x^(-1/2)
=(-1/2)x^(-1/2 -1) = (-1/2)x^(-3/2)(26 votes)
- Given f(x) = x, is f'(0) undefined, as x^0 is defined only if x != 0?(7 votes)
- Ok, I figured out that in this case we need to fall back on the derivative definition:
f'(x) = lim h->0 (f(x+h)-f(x))/h = lim h->0 (x+h-x)/h = lim h->0 h/h = lim h->0 1 = 1
This way f'(x) is defined even for x=0(16 votes)
- Does the power rule work with polynomials like 2x^3+4x^2+9x+17?(4 votes)
- There is a theorem that states that the derivative of a sum is equal to the sum of the derivatives. So yes! Just use the power rule on each term separately, and then add them all up.(21 votes)
- I know it late to ask but I just wanted to ask that is f(x) always equal to the y? Even in 3-D?(12 votes)
- In the two dimensional case we typically label the dependent variable Y, meaning it's value is dependent on other variables, in 2D there is only one other variable, usually called X (an "independent variable". There is nothing special about their labels howevere, and you could swap X and Y or even solve for Y for instance x = (y - b)/m for slope intercept and graph that way. The X and Y of the graph are just traditional standards, it is more important to understand how dependent and independent variables relate to eachother.
In three dimensions, if solving for Y, X and Z are would normally both be dependent variables(6 votes)
- So if n is 0 and f(x) = x, would f'(x) = 1/x?(3 votes)
- No. The derivative of x is 1. If f(x) was x^0 then the power rule states that you would pull the 0 out in front and subtract one from the exponent, well, anything multiplied by 0 is still 0.(11 votes)
- This may be a tad off topic... I apologize in advance.
If you take any function f(x) and take the derivative of the derivative of the derivative... etc. Where will you end up? If you keep going to infinity, will the derivative just be a horizontal line?(5 votes)
- Hi Natalie,
Depends on the function. Some of them are interesting for example, Google the derivative of f(x) = e^x
For the types of function that you were likely thinking about I have a few questions that will lead you to the answer.
1) What is the derivative of a constant?
2) Is zero a constant?
- After we make the curve on the graph , what does making a seacant line represents ?
I mean like in the above video what is the use of makin a seacant line after makig the curve . The slope of any point can also be calculated without makin the seacant line .(3 votes)
- From what I have learned we would use the Secant line for the average slope of a curve between two points and then use the Tan Line as h->0 to get the instantaneous rate of change of the curve at any given point as h->0 Look at the video for Diveratives and it shows a lot more information about the difference of the secant line and Tan Line.
Also one key note the steps to get the secant line and tan line are very similer the only difference is you take the LIM as h-> 0 to get the tan line.(3 votes)
- How would the power rule apply to a question that asks for you to simplify and answer using a single exponent of something like this
- You multiply the exponents.
(v⁶)⁵ = v³⁰
Then you apply the power rule in the normal way.
d/dx (x⁶)⁵ = 30x²⁹
So a lot of these problems are easier if you simplify before you differentiate. It doesn't always help, but it often does.(3 votes)
- Can anyone proof (origin) of this rule ??(2 votes)
- Are you familiar with the Binomial theorem? If not, I recommend checking it out first.
What I want to do in this video is to see whether the power rule is giving us results that at least seem reasonable. This is by no means a proof of the power rule, but at least we'll feel a little bit more comfortable using it. So let's say that f of x is equal to x. The power rule tells us that f prime of x is going to be equal to what? Well, x is the same thing as x to the first power. So n is implicitly 1 right over here. So we bring the 1 out front. It'll be 1 times x to the 1 minus 1 power. So it's going to be 1 times x to the 0 power. x to the 0 is just 1. So it's just going to be equal to 1. Now, does that makes conceptual sense if we actually try to visualize these functions? So let me actually try to graph these functions. So that's my y-axis. This is my x-axis. And let me graph y equals x. So y is equal to f of x here. So y is equal to x. So it looks something like that. So y is equal to x. Or this is f of x is equal to x, or y is equal to this f of x right over there. Now, actually, let me just call that f of x just to not confuse you. So this right over here is f of x is equal to x that I graphed right over here. y is equal to f of x, which is equal to x. And now, let me graph the derivative. Let me graph f prime of x. That's saying it's 1. That's saying it's 1 for all x. Regardless of what x is, it's going to be equal to 1. Is this consistent with what we know about derivatives and slopes and all the rest? Well, let's look at our function. What is the slope of the tangent line right at this point? Well, right over here, this has slope 1 continuously. Or it has a constant slope of 1. Slope is equal to 1 no matter what x is. It's a line. And for a line, the slope is constant. So over here, the slope is indeed 1. If you go to this point over here, the slope is indeed 1. If you go over here, the slope is indeed 1. So we've got a pretty valid response there. Now, let's try something where the slope might change. So let's say I have g of x is equal to x squared. The power rule tells us that g prime of x would be equal to what? Well, n is equal to 2. So it's going to be 2 times x to the 2 minus 1. Or it's going to be equal to 2 x to the first power. It's going to be equal to 2x. So let's see if this makes a reasonable sense. And I'm going to try to graph this one a little bit more precisely. Let's see how precisely I can graph it. So this is the x-axis, y-axis. Let me mark some stuff off here. So this is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. This is 1, 2, 3, 4. 1, 2, 3, 4. So g of x. When x is 0, it's 0. When x is 1, it is 1. When x is negative 1, it's 1. When x is 2, it is 4. So that puts us right over there-- 1, 2, 3, 4. Puts us right over there. When x is negative 2, you get to 4. It's a parabola. You've seen this for many years. I put that point a little bit too high. It looks something like this. Actually, the last two points I graphed are a little bit weird. So this might be right over here. So it looks something like this. It looks something like that. And then, when you come over here, it looks something like that. It's symmetric. So I'm trying my best to draw it reasonably. So there you go. That's the graph of g of x. g of x is equal to x squared. Now, let's graph g prime of x or what the power rule is telling us a g prime of x is. So g prime of x is equal to 2x. So that's just a line that goes through the origin of slope 2. So it looks something like that. When x is equal to 1, y is equal to 2. When x is equal to 2, y or g of x is equal to 4. So it looks something like this. Let me try my best to draw a straight line. It looks something like this. Now, does this make sense? Well, if you just eyeball it really fast, if you look at this point right over here-- and you want to think about the slope of the tangent line. Let me do this in a color that pops out a little bit more. So the tangent line would look something like this. So it looks like it has a reasonably high negative slope. Yeah. It's definitely a negative slope, and it's a pretty steep negative slope. For x is equal to negative 2, g prime of negative 2 is equal to 2 times negative 2, which is equal to negative 4. So this is claiming that the slope at this point-- so this right over here is negative 4-- is saying that the slope of this point is negative 4. m is equal to negative 4. That looks about right. It's a fairly steep negative slope. Now, what happens if you go right over here when x is equal to 0? Well, our derivative-- if you say g prime of 0-- is telling us that the slope of our original function, g, at x is equal to 0 is 2 times 0 is 0. Well, does that make sense? Well, if we go to our original parabola, it does indeed make sense. That's the slope of the tangent line. The tangent line looks something like this. We're at a minimum point. We're at the vertex. The slope really does look to be 0. And what if you go right over here to x equals 2, the slope of the tangent line? Well, over here, the tangent line looks something like this. It looks like a fairly steep positive slope. What is our derivative telling us based on the power rule? So this is essentially saying, hey, tell me what the slope of the tangent line for g is when x is equal to 2. Well, we figured it out. It's going to be 2 times x. It's going to be 2 times 2, which is equal to 4. It's telling us that the slope over here is 4. And I'm just using m. m is often the letter used to denote slope. They're saying that the slope of the tangent line there is 4, which seems completely, completely reasonable. So I encourage you to try this out yourself. I encourage you to try to estimate the slopes by calculating, by taking points closer and closer around those points. And you'll see that the power rule really does give you results that actually make sense.