If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Using tables to approximate limit values

AP.CALC:
LIM‑1 (EU)
,
LIM‑1.C (LO)
,
LIM‑1.C.5 (EK)
Tables can be a powerful tool to approximate a limit, but they need to be used wisely. Learn how to create tables in order to find a good approximation of a limit, and learn how to approximate a limit given a table of values.
Limits are a tool for reasoning about function behavior, and tables are a tool for reasoning about limits. One nice thing about tables is that we can get more precise estimates of limits than we'd get by eyeballing graphs.
When using a table to approximate limits, it's important to create it in a way that simulates the feeling of getting "infinitely close" to some desired x-value.

Example

Imagine we're asked to approximate this limit:
limit, start subscript, x, \to, 2, end subscript, start fraction, x, minus, 2, divided by, x, squared, minus, 4, end fraction
Note: The function is actually undefined at x, equals, 2 because the denominator evaluates to zero, but the limit as x approaches 2 still exists.
Step 1: We'd like to pick a value that's a little bit less than x, equals, 2 (that is, a value that's "to the left" of 2 when thinking about the standard x-axis), so maybe start with something like x, equals, 1, point, 9.
x1, point, 92
f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis0, point, 2564undefined
Step 2: Try a couple more x-values to simulate the feeling of getting infinitely close to x, equals, 2 from the left.
x1, point, 91, point, 991, point, 99992
f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis0, point, 25640, point, 25060, point, 25001undefined
Notice how our x-values left brace, 1, point, 9, comma, 1, point, 99, comma, 1, point, 9999, right brace really "zoom in" around x, equals, 2. A worse choice of x-values would have been constant increments like left brace, minus, 1, comma, 0, comma, 1, right brace, which aren't very helpful for thinking about getting infinitely close to x, equals, 2.
Step 3: Approach x, equals, 2 from the right just like we did from the left. We want to do this in a way that simulates the feeling of getting infinitely close to x, equals, 2.
x1, point, 91, point, 991, point, 99992, point, 00012, point, 012, point, 1
f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis0, point, 25640, point, 25060, point, 250010, point, 249990, point, 24940, point, 2439
(Note: We've removed x, equals, 2 from the table to save space, and also because it isn't necessary for reasoning about the limit value.)
Looking at the table we've created, we have very strong evidence that the limit is 0, point, 25. But, if we're honest with ourselves, we must admit that what we have is only a reasonable approximation. We can't say for sure that this is the actual value of the limit.
Problem 1
Three students were given a function f and asked to estimate limit, start subscript, x, \to, 2, end subscript, f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis. Each student created a table (shown below).
Each table is accurate, but which one is the best for approximating the limit?
Choose 1 answer:

Want more practice? Try this exercise.

Common mistakes when creating tables to estimate limits

Here are a several things to watch out for as you create your own tables to approximate limits:
Assuming the function value is the limit value: The example above highlights a case where function is undefined, yet the limit still exists. Avoid jumping to conclusions about the limit value based on the function value.
Not getting infinitely close: Getting infinitely close means we’re trying to get so close to a desired x-value that there’s very little room left between where we are and where that value is—close enough to convince us that the estimate we’re getting is most likely what the limit is.
Avoid picking x-values in constant increments like left brace, minus, 1, comma, 0, comma, 1, right brace or even left brace, 1, point, 91, comma, 1, point, 92, comma, 1, point, 93, right brace because those values don't really get us infinitely close—they only get us kind of close. To get infinitely close, we want to keep reducing our increments, using x-values like left brace, 1, point, 9, comma, 1, point, 99, comma, 1, point, 999, right brace, so that we’re shrinking the space between where we are and where we’d like to be.
Not approaching from both sides: Remember to approach your desired x-value from both the left and the right. Remember, for the limit to exist, the left- and right-hand limits must be equal. Avoid jumping to conclusions about the limit value after only approaching your desired x-value from one side.
Assuming "left side" means "negative": Some students mistakenly believe that when approaching from the left they must use negative numbers. In the example above, we approached x, equals, 2 from the left by using positive values that were just a little bit less than 2, such as 1, point, 9 and 1, point, 99. Don't assume you must use negative x-values when approaching from the left.
Problem 2
The function g is defined over the real numbers. This table gives select values of g.
xg, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis
43, point, 37
4, point, 93, point, 5
4, point, 993, point, 66
4, point, 9993, point, 68
56, point, 37
5, point, 0013, point, 68
5, point, 013, point, 7
5, point, 13, point, 84
63, point, 97
What is a reasonable estimate for limit, start subscript, x, \to, 5, end subscript, g, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis?
Choose 1 answer:

Want more practice? Try this exercise.

Common mistakes when estimating limits from tables

Confusing the limit value with the function value: Remember that the limit of a function at a certain point isn't necessarily equal to the function's value at that point. For example, in Problem 2, g, left parenthesis, 5, right parenthesis, equals, 6, point, 37 but limit, start subscript, x, \to, 5, end subscript, g, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis is about 3, point, 68.
Thinking a limit value is always an integer: Some limits are "nice" and have integer values or nice fraction values. For example, the limit in our first example here was 0, point, 25. Some limits are less nice, like the limit in Problem 2 which is somewhere around 3, point, 68.

Summary questions

Problem 3
A student created a table to help them reason about limit, start subscript, x, \to, 7, end subscript, g, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis.
x66, point, 996, point, 999977, point, 00017, point, 018
g, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesisminus, 3, point, 41minus, 1, point, 94minus, 1, point, 9252undefinedminus, 1, point, 9248minus, 1, point, 910, point, 46
Based on the table, what can you reasonably conclude about the limit?
Choose 1 answer:

Problem 4
The table gives a few values of function f. The function is increasing everywhere except at x, equals, 5, and limit, start subscript, x, \to, 5, end subscript, f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis exists.
x2345678
f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis3, point, 74, point, 34, point, 94, point, 85, point, 66, point, 26, point, 9
Which is a reasonable estimate for limit, start subscript, x, \to, 5, end subscript, f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis?
Choose 1 answer:

Want to join the conversation?