If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

### Course: Class 12 math (India)>Unit 5

Lesson 1: Continuity at a point

# Worked example: Continuity at a point (graphical)

In this video, we explore the necessary conditions for continuity at a point using graphical representations of functions. We analyze two examples to determine if the left-hand and right-hand limits exist, if the function is defined at the point, and then we use these observations to determine if the function is continuous at that point.

## Want to join the conversation?

• what is the specific difference between lim at x=3+ or 3- and 3 itself? and why?
• When we write 3+ or 3‾ we meant one-sided limit. 3+ means x approaches 3 from the positive (right) direction and 3‾ means x->3 from the negative (left) direction.

When we just write 3 without the + or - we are talking about two-sided limit. Mean x approach 3 from both the left and right at the same time.

For a limit (two-sided) to exist, the limit from the left must equal to the limit from the right.

So for example,

Lim x->3+ = 2 and lim x->3- = 10, since they are not the same, then lim x->3 doesn't exist.
However, if lim x->3+ = 5 and lim x->3- = 5, since they are equal, then the lim x->3 exist and is 5.

Hope that helps.
• I don't know if anyone has pointed this out yet but in the videos Sal says that for the graphs with asymptotes that no limit exists which is fair as from the left in the graphs we go through the limit is infinity which isn't a number and in the "classical" definition thus there is no limit. The problem is the questions ask the same thing in the quiz before this section but they want me to input the limit is infinity, in fact the answers available do not provide the "does not exist" option at all so Sal says one thing and the questions say another which is conflicting and confusing.
• Perhaps you're right and the question and the tutorial are inconsistent.

Know this however: you are correct, infinity is not a number, and it cannot used as the value of a limit. [It's not a number in the sense that 2 is a number, let's say]
If a function approaches infinity (either positive or negative) as the x-value approaches the asymptote (from the left or right) then the function is unbounded at that point as much as it is undefined at that point. Indeed the "limit" does not exist. However the function can reach any arbitrarily large value for any suitably chosen x value (respective of left or right) close to the asymptote. Additionally note that the value of the function exactly at the asymptote is not defined.

In rational functions, you can have asymptotes or a "removable" discontinuity. Assuming we are dealing with asymptotes, approaching the x value of the asymptote from either the left or right will result in either a positive or negative infinity. Here the limit doesn't "equal" infinity, so much that it "does not exist". In the questions, they likely only want you to stipulate whether or not a function approaches positive infinity or negative infinity as x approaches the discontinuity. Feel free to substitute Lim f(x) "approaches" for "equals".

Side-note: In future questions, I discourage you from using run-on sentences. The clarity of an answer can sometimes depend on the clarity of the question.
• what does a solid dot and a hollow dot indicate??
• A solid dot on a line indicates that the line goes through that point. A hollow dot on a line indicates that the line is not defined at that point.
• At , how come g(x) is defined when x=3+ amd x=3- are not equal?
• A function does not need to be continuous to be defined. When x = 3 there is a coordinate point that is defined that satisfies the situation, even though the limit does not exist.
• What if a function is continuous before a point, but it's not defined immediately after that point ?
• That's not uncommon. Take the function f(x)=x² on the interval [-1, 1]. f is continuous on that entire interval, including at the endpoints, but not defined past them.

You can also take this function and change the output at the points -1 and 1 only, so that the function is continuous on (-1, 1), discontinuous but still defined at -1 and 1, and undefined elsewhere.
• How do I tell whether a function is defined at a point?
• If you place the value of that point into the function, and the function solves into some real number, then the function is defined at that point.
• Couldn't the second graph be continuous AT x=3? Since the point at y=2 isn't defined, wouldn't it be possible to say that when x=3, there's only one defined point and therefore the graph is continuous at that specific point?

edit: the reason I'm confused about this is because the question doesn't ask if the graph is continuous at the limit as x approaches 3 of g(x), but whether or not the graph is continuous at x=3. I completely understand that the limit is discontinuous but i don't understand how x=3 is.
• 𝑔(2.9999...) = 2

But 2.9999... = 3, and 𝑔(3) = −2

So, even though we have chosen to define 𝑔(3) as equal to −2 there is a discontinuity at 𝑥 = 3.
• The limit exists at g(x) when approaching x from 3- side and the limit is suppose to be 2, but how can it be the limit if at 2 the point is open.
• If a certain point is not defined, but the values approaching it are, the limit still exists because when you find the limit of a certain value, you are finding the value the function approaches as x approaches that value. The function does not have to be defined at that value as long as the value of the function as x approaches that point exists (and, if you are finding a two-sided limit, the values as you approach x from both sides are equal).
• For a limit to be continuous, shouldn't the right side and the left side should be defined and also should exist without any breaks. Right?