Sal subtracts and simplifies (a-2)/(a+2) - (a-3)/(a²+4a+4). Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- at3:00why did Sal make it into a difference of square, couldn't he have just left it as
(a+2)(a-2)(a-3)/(a+2)(a+2), then crossed out the (a+2)'s and simplified? (just curious)(8 votes)
- No he couldn't, listen carefully around at4:05up to4:21to see why.
The final answer is:
Because if we factor a²-a-1 it will not turn to (a+2)(a-2)(a-3). In fact if solve this using the quadratic equation you will see that it will factor into complex numbers.(10 votes)
- how come he didn't change + a-3/(a+2)(a+2) to -a-3/(a+2)(a+2) like that's what her did in those previous videos but when I changed the sign my answer came out different ! help someone please explain 😩😥😭😭😭😭(3 votes)
- The minus in front of the fraction applies to the entire numerator: - (a - 3)
Distribute the minus: - (a - 3) = -a + 3
Hope this helps.(10 votes)
- The question asks for me to Simplify and expand the following expression:
When I put in the answer in this exact format
(13z^2 −33z+10)/(6z^2 −4z−10)
It tells me "Your answer is not fully expanded and simplified.", when I go look up the answer for the question is display the same answer yet it keeps telling me it's incorrect. Is there something i'm doing incorrect in the input?(3 votes)
- I am having the same issue with the last 2 tests in that section. I wrote it out the same way you did, the numbers in the numerator and denominator in parentheses divided by one another. I clicked on report the problem on both tests, so that they know there is a problem. You may want to try that too. If we are writing it out incorrectly, someone please reply.(5 votes)
- I had a question that was (7z^2)/(12z^3-4z^2) plus another rational expression. I pulled out 4z^2 to make it (7z^2)/ 4z^2(3z-1). Why is it wrong to cancel the two z^2 before adding?(3 votes)
- Based on the information you give, it isn't wrong to cancel them out --- BUT --- without seeing the entire problem and the rest of your work on it, I can't be sure why someone would have said it was wrong to cancel them out. ( Is it possible that not canceling them out would have made finding a common denominator easier?)(2 votes)
- how would i solve: 2x+1/x2+8x+16x-3/x2-16(2 votes)
- Hi Jennifer
If you are asking how to solve 2x+1/(x^2+8x+16x-3/x^2-16), than an example of how you would solve it goes like this where 2x+1 = a, x^2+24x-3 = b, and x^2-16 = c:
=a / (b/c)
=a/1 * c/b
So now let's re-arrange a, b, and c, using your numbers:
= ac / b
=(2x+1)(x^2-16) / x^2+8x+16
= (2x+1)(x+4)(x-4) / (x+4)(x+4)
cross out the x+4 in the numerator and the denominator because anything over itself = 1
=(2x+1)(x-4) / (x+4)
Hope this helps!(2 votes)
- I have just now completed the Algebra II course. However, there are a couple of sections I need to review before I take the Unit Test because I started taking the older version of Algebra II and then switched to the newer version of Algebra II and there are more topics covered in the new version of Algebra II.
But bottom line I have two questions concerning my continued math journey.
1. After I complete my review of Algebra II should I go directly to Pre-Calculus or Calculus since I completed Algebra II?
2. I took Geometry many years ago and don’t remember very much, if any, about the course. Should I take Geometry on Khan Academy before I start taking Pre-Calculus or Calculus?
Thanks in advance.(1 vote)
- Congrats! I would suggest just skimming the unit test of geometry before going into precalc/calc. Geometry is a very important part of math in my opinion, and you need to know the stuff. Also, I would first take the unit test on precalc and see how much I get correct before taking calc. If you feel like there were some things in there that you did not know, I would recommed taking precalc before calc, but otherwise, you for calc!
Also, there is a unit called "Trigonometry" that you should take as well (before calc/precalc). This should mostly review from alg-2 but there are also some other concepets there that I found helpful(2 votes)
- I don t know where to ask so i ask here. I found on quiz next to this video this problem https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwqUaKWKcTiLQlpZd3dmT3kxV2c/edit?usp=sharing
I put the first solution with mauve and says that is wrong i solve how they ask and if i go on with the simplification after the solution that is accepted with blue i get the same solution like i do it on the short way. Where i am wrong. What i miss?(1 vote)
- In4:29, the answer is a^2-a-1/(a+2)^2. However, the denominator which is (a+2)^2, when it is multiplied out, wouldn't it equal a^2+4a+4. So the a^2 in the numerator and the a^2 in the denominator would cancel out?(1 vote)
- not exactly. Let's use real numbers. if you had (2+3)/(2+5) the 2s do not cancel outthe only time something in the numerator and denominator cancel out is if everything in the numerator/ denominator are being multiplied by the same thing. Back to using variables.
a/a cancels out to 1
a(b+1)/(b+1) the b+1 cancels out so it's just a
[(b-2)(c-a+d)] /[(c+d-a)(x+y)] has c-a+d cancel out with c+d-a since they are equivalent, and the fraction simplifies to (b-2)/(x+y)
Let me know if that didn't help, I can try to explain differently, but basically two things have to be multiplied together to then have something int he denominator cancel out. Usually it's in parenthesis like that.(2 votes)
Find the difference. Express the answer as a simplified rational expression, and state the domain. We have two rational expressions, and we're subtracting one from the other. Just like when we first learned to subtract fractions, or add fractions, we have to find a common denominator. The best way to find a common denominator, if were just dealing with regular numbers, or with algebraic expressions, is to factor them out, and make sure that our common denominator has all of the factors in it-- that'll ensure that it's divisible by the two denominators here. This guy right here is completely factored-- he's just a plus 2. This one over here, let's see if we can factor it: a squared plus 4a plus 4. Well, you see the pattern that 4 is 2 squared, 4 is 2 times 2, so a squared plus 4a plus 4 is a plus 2 times a plus 2, or a plus 2 squared. We could say it's a plus 2 times a plus 2-- that's what a squared plus 4a plus 4 is. This is obviously divisible by itself-- everything is divisible by itself, except, I guess, for 0, is divisible by itself, and it's also divisible by a plus 2, so this is the least common multiple of this expression, and that expression, and it could be a good common denominator. Let's set that up. This will be the same thing as being equal to this first term right here, a minus 2 over a plus 2, but we want the denominator now to be a plus 2 times a plus 2-- we wanted it to be a plus 2 squared. So, let's multiply this numerator and denominator by a plus 2, so its denominator is the same thing as this. Let's multiply both the numerator and the denominator by a plus 2. We're going to assume that a is not equal to negative 2, that would have made this undefined, and it would have also made this undefined. Throughout this whole thing, we're going to assume that a cannot be equal to negative 2. The domain is all real numbers, a can be any real number except for negative 2. So, the first term is that-- extend the line a little bit-- and then the second term doesn't change, because its denominator is already the common denominator. Minus a minus 3 over-- and we could write it either as a plus 2 times a plus 2, or as this thing over here. Let's write it in the factored form, because it'll make it easier to simplify later on: a plus 2 times a plus 2. And now, before we-- let's set this up like this-- now, before we add the numerators, it'll probably be a good idea to multiply this out right there, but let me write the denominator, we know what that is: it is a plus 2 times a plus 2. Now this numerator: if we have a minus 2 times a plus 2, we've seen that pattern before. We can multiply it out if you like, but we've seen it enough hopefully to recognize that this is going to be a squared minus 2 squared. This is going to be a squared minus 4. You can multiply it out, and the middle terms cancel out-- the negative 2 times a cancels out the a times 2, and you're just left with a squared minus 4-- that's that over there. And then you have this: you have minus a minus 3, so let's be very careful here-- you're subtracting a minus 3, so you want to distribute the negative sign, or multiply both of these terms times negative 1. So you could put a minus a here, and then negative 3 is plus 3, so what does this simplify to? You have a squared minus a plus-- let's see, negative 4 plus 3 is negative 1, all of that over a plus 2 times a plus 2. We could write that as a plus 2 squared. Now, we might want to factor this numerator out more, to just make sure it doesn't contain a common factor with the denominator. The denominator is just 2a plus 2 is multiplied by themselves. And you can see from inspection a plus 2 will not be a factor in this top expression-- if it was, this number right here would be divisible by 2, it's not divisible by 2. So, a plus 2 is not one of the factors here, so there's not going to be any more simplification, even if we were able to factor this thing, and the numerator out. So we're done. We have simplified the rational expression, and the domain is for all a's, except for a cannot, or, all a's given that a does not equal negative 2-- all a's except for negative 2. And we are done.