If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Subtracting rational expressions

Sal subtracts and simplifies (a-2)/(a+2) - (a-3)/(a²+4a+4). Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

  • spunky sam blue style avatar for user Asad.k288
    at why did Sal make it into a difference of square, couldn't he have just left it as
    (a+2)(a-2)(a-3)/(a+2)(a+2), then crossed out the (a+2)'s and simplified? (just curious)
    (9 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky tree style avatar for user Journey
    how come he didn't change + a-3/(a+2)(a+2) to -a-3/(a+2)(a+2) like that's what her did in those previous videos but when I changed the sign my answer came out different ! help someone please explain 😩😥😭😭😭😭
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • aqualine tree style avatar for user Staskiewicz Radoslaw
    The question asks for me to Simplify and expand the following expression:
    When I put in the answer in this exact format
    (13z^2 −33z+10)/(6z^2 −4z−10)

    It tells me "Your answer is not fully expanded and simplified.", when I go look up the answer for the question is display the same answer yet it keeps telling me it's incorrect. Is there something i'm doing incorrect in the input?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • hopper happy style avatar for user Rachel
      I am having the same issue with the last 2 tests in that section. I wrote it out the same way you did, the numbers in the numerator and denominator in parentheses divided by one another. I clicked on report the problem on both tests, so that they know there is a problem. You may want to try that too. If we are writing it out incorrectly, someone please reply.
      (6 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user 😊
    Good eve my given in denominator is the same how to solution them
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user JonathanDLowe7
    I had a question that was (7z^2)/(12z^3-4z^2) plus another rational expression. I pulled out 4z^2 to make it (7z^2)/ 4z^2(3z-1). Why is it wrong to cancel the two z^2 before adding?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • aqualine tree style avatar for user Judith Gibson
      Based on the information you give, it isn't wrong to cancel them out --- BUT --- without seeing the entire problem and the rest of your work on it, I can't be sure why someone would have said it was wrong to cancel them out. ( Is it possible that not canceling them out would have made finding a common denominator easier?)
      (2 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user cunninghamjennifer48
    how would i solve: 2x+1/x2+8x+16x-3/x2-16
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leafers ultimate style avatar for user Jimmy
      Hi Jennifer
      If you are asking how to solve 2x+1/(x^2+8x+16x-3/x^2-16), than an example of how you would solve it goes like this where 2x+1 = a, x^2+24x-3 = b, and x^2-16 = c:
      =a / (b/c)
      =a/1 * c/b
      So now let's re-arrange a, b, and c, using your numbers:
      = ac / b
      =(2x+1)(x^2-16) / x^2+8x+16
      = (2x+1)(x+4)(x-4) / (x+4)(x+4)
      cross out the x+4 in the numerator and the denominator because anything over itself = 1
      =(2x+1)(x-4) / (x+4)

      Hope this helps!
      (3 votes)
  • duskpin seed style avatar for user amberr9827
    3 2 2
    ------- + ------- - -------
    x (x-2) x^2
    how would I solve this?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Bobby Sotzen
    How do I slove:
    3x 2
    -------- - -------
    x-5 xsquared -25
    Not really sure what the least Common Denominator is (i think it is (x+5)(x-5) not sure what to do from there
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • hopper cool style avatar for user Chuck Towle
      You have
      3x/(x-5) - 2/(x²-25)
      And you are correct that (x²-25) is (x+5)(x-5)
      So you have
      3x/(x+5) - 2/((x+5)(x-5))
      The first fraction nneds to also have the same denominator, so
      you want to multiply the first fraction by (x-5)(x-5)
      3x(x-5) / ((x+5)(x-5)) - 2 / ((x+5)(x-5))
      Distribute the 3x in the first fraction numerator
      (3x²-15x) / ((x+5)(x-5)) - 2 / ((x+5)(x-5)) And combine the numerators
      (3x²-15x-2) / ((x+5)(x-5))

      I hope that helps make it click for you.
      (2 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Fred Haynes
    I have just now completed the Algebra II course. However, there are a couple of sections I need to review before I take the Unit Test because I started taking the older version of Algebra II and then switched to the newer version of Algebra II and there are more topics covered in the new version of Algebra II.
    But bottom line I have two questions concerning my continued math journey.

    1. After I complete my review of Algebra II should I go directly to Pre-Calculus or Calculus since I completed Algebra II?

    2. I took Geometry many years ago and don’t remember very much, if any, about the course. Should I take Geometry on Khan Academy before I start taking Pre-Calculus or Calculus?
    Thanks in advance.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user Ash_001
      Congrats! I would suggest just skimming the unit test of geometry before going into precalc/calc. Geometry is a very important part of math in my opinion, and you need to know the stuff. Also, I would first take the unit test on precalc and see how much I get correct before taking calc. If you feel like there were some things in there that you did not know, I would recommed taking precalc before calc, but otherwise, you for calc!
      Also, there is a unit called "Trigonometry" that you should take as well (before calc/precalc). This should mostly review from alg-2 but there are also some other concepets there that I found helpful
      (2 votes)
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user burlacuionutcosmin
    I don t know where to ask so i ask here. I found on quiz next to this video this problem https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwqUaKWKcTiLQlpZd3dmT3kxV2c/edit?usp=sharing
    I put the first solution with mauve and says that is wrong i solve how they ask and if i go on with the simplification after the solution that is accepted with blue i get the same solution like i do it on the short way. Where i am wrong. What i miss?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

Find the difference. Express the answer as a simplified rational expression, and state the domain. We have two rational expressions, and we're subtracting one from the other. Just like when we first learned to subtract fractions, or add fractions, we have to find a common denominator. The best way to find a common denominator, if were just dealing with regular numbers, or with algebraic expressions, is to factor them out, and make sure that our common denominator has all of the factors in it-- that'll ensure that it's divisible by the two denominators here. This guy right here is completely factored-- he's just a plus 2. This one over here, let's see if we can factor it: a squared plus 4a plus 4. Well, you see the pattern that 4 is 2 squared, 4 is 2 times 2, so a squared plus 4a plus 4 is a plus 2 times a plus 2, or a plus 2 squared. We could say it's a plus 2 times a plus 2-- that's what a squared plus 4a plus 4 is. This is obviously divisible by itself-- everything is divisible by itself, except, I guess, for 0, is divisible by itself, and it's also divisible by a plus 2, so this is the least common multiple of this expression, and that expression, and it could be a good common denominator. Let's set that up. This will be the same thing as being equal to this first term right here, a minus 2 over a plus 2, but we want the denominator now to be a plus 2 times a plus 2-- we wanted it to be a plus 2 squared. So, let's multiply this numerator and denominator by a plus 2, so its denominator is the same thing as this. Let's multiply both the numerator and the denominator by a plus 2. We're going to assume that a is not equal to negative 2, that would have made this undefined, and it would have also made this undefined. Throughout this whole thing, we're going to assume that a cannot be equal to negative 2. The domain is all real numbers, a can be any real number except for negative 2. So, the first term is that-- extend the line a little bit-- and then the second term doesn't change, because its denominator is already the common denominator. Minus a minus 3 over-- and we could write it either as a plus 2 times a plus 2, or as this thing over here. Let's write it in the factored form, because it'll make it easier to simplify later on: a plus 2 times a plus 2. And now, before we-- let's set this up like this-- now, before we add the numerators, it'll probably be a good idea to multiply this out right there, but let me write the denominator, we know what that is: it is a plus 2 times a plus 2. Now this numerator: if we have a minus 2 times a plus 2, we've seen that pattern before. We can multiply it out if you like, but we've seen it enough hopefully to recognize that this is going to be a squared minus 2 squared. This is going to be a squared minus 4. You can multiply it out, and the middle terms cancel out-- the negative 2 times a cancels out the a times 2, and you're just left with a squared minus 4-- that's that over there. And then you have this: you have minus a minus 3, so let's be very careful here-- you're subtracting a minus 3, so you want to distribute the negative sign, or multiply both of these terms times negative 1. So you could put a minus a here, and then negative 3 is plus 3, so what does this simplify to? You have a squared minus a plus-- let's see, negative 4 plus 3 is negative 1, all of that over a plus 2 times a plus 2. We could write that as a plus 2 squared. Now, we might want to factor this numerator out more, to just make sure it doesn't contain a common factor with the denominator. The denominator is just 2a plus 2 is multiplied by themselves. And you can see from inspection a plus 2 will not be a factor in this top expression-- if it was, this number right here would be divisible by 2, it's not divisible by 2. So, a plus 2 is not one of the factors here, so there's not going to be any more simplification, even if we were able to factor this thing, and the numerator out. So we're done. We have simplified the rational expression, and the domain is for all a's, except for a cannot, or, all a's given that a does not equal negative 2-- all a's except for negative 2. And we are done.