can anyone show me how can i plot these 3d graphs on matlab or mathematica or maxima or scilab or anyother app? :(

Found the link below really helpful http://www.mathworks.com/company/newsletters/articles/using-matlabs-meshgrid-command-and-array-operators-to-implement-one-and-two-variable-functions.html

can you make everything a little clearer? I am having trouble understanding

In order to discriminate what each value (or set of values), when pumped into the function, will return, you must have one dimension per variable. Take this analogy: you have a bag of apples, and a bag of oranges. You want to express how many you gain per second, at any given second, and make a model of it. So you section the floor into "blocks" and label each block with a time. Then you take however many apples, and however many bananas that you gained and place a apple or banana in that section, respectively. We can't display how many apples AND bananas we gained by only placing apples in the marked off section: we need both apples AND bananas so people can discriminate between them, right? Same thing with a graph. We can't display two values with only one dimension: we need (at least) one dimension per value. All is great if we only have 2 or 3 values in total, but what happens when we get to 4? Or 5? Or 100? Can you imagine a 100 dimension grid? I can't. I hope I helped. Please tell me if I completely missed what you were struggling with.

In the second paragraph under the header 'Limitations', f(x,y) = (x^2,y^2) is said to be a function of two inputs and one output, while in the third paragraph, f(x,y,) = (x^2 + y^2) is said to be a function of two inputs and one output. I don't understand the how f(x,y,) can represent either one output, or two. Also, I don't understand why different notation is used between (x^2,y^2) and (x^2 + y^2) if they are both two inputs. Sorry if the question is unclear or doesn't make sense!

Hi there, do not get confused, output is given in the form of f(x,y) this means that we are getting two outputs by putting the value of x and y in to the function, so this function produces two values one is x and y for each given or certain value of x and y. Eg: F(x,y) = sin(x) , tg (y) here I have independent values x and y this is so clear, to my function I am producing one sin(x) output for x values, and one tg (y) output for any y. Pay attention; If I write F(x,y) = sin(x).tg(y) in this case my function returns only one value for each given x and y. ( dot and semicolon)

In example 3, what would the image look like if we looked at it from the yz plain?

In the 𝑦𝑧-plane, the points plotted are (𝑥², sin(𝑥)), which means that the curve would look like the functions 𝑓₁(𝑥) = sin(√𝑥) and 𝑓₂(𝑥) = −sin(√𝑥).

Main content

Multivariable calculus

Course: Multivariable calculus > Unit 1

Lesson 6: Visualizing multivariable functions (articles)

Multidimensional graphs

Google Classroom

Examples and limitations of graphing multivariable functions.

Background

Multivariable functions

What we're building to

Graphing a function with a two-dimensional input and a one-dimensional output requires plotting points in three-dimensional space.
This ends up looking like a surface in three-dimensions, where the height of the surface above the x, y-plane indicates the value of the function at each point.

Reviewing graphs of single-variable functions

Graphs are, by far, the most familiar way to visualize functions for most students. Before generalizing to multivariable functions, let's quickly review how graphs work for single-variable functions.

Suppose our function looks like this:

\begin{aligned} \quad f(x) = -x^2 + 3x + 2 \end{aligned}

To plot a single input, like x, equals, 1, we first compute f, left parenthesis, 1, right parenthesis:

\begin{aligned} \quad f(1) &= -x^2 + 3x + 2 \\ &= -(1)^2 + 3(1) + 2 \\ &= 4 \end{aligned}

Then we mark the point left parenthesis, 1, comma, f, left parenthesis, 1, right parenthesis, right parenthesis on the x, y-plane. In this case, that means marking left parenthesis, 1, comma, 4, right parenthesis.

When we do this for all possible inputs x, not just 1, we see what all the points of the form left parenthesis, x, comma, f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, right parenthesis look like.

Unless f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis is some exotic or sporadic function that gives wildly different values as x changes slightly, the result will be a smooth-looking curve.

Adding one more dimension

So what can we do for functions with a two-dimensional input and a one-dimensional output? Perhaps something like this:

f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, equals, left parenthesis, x, minus, 2, right parenthesis, squared, plus, left parenthesis, y, minus, 2, right parenthesis, squared, plus, 2

Associating inputs with outputs requires three numbers—two for the inputs and one for the output.

		Inputs left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis	Output f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis
		left parenthesis, 0, comma, 0, right parenthesis	10
		left parenthesis, 1, comma, 0, right parenthesis	7
		left parenthesis, 1, comma, 2, right parenthesis	3
		\varvdots, rectangle	\varvdots, rectangle

To represent these associations using a graph, we plot points in three dimensions.

The association left parenthesis, 0, comma, 0, right parenthesis, right arrow, 10 is plotted with the point left parenthesis, 0, comma, 0, comma, 10, right parenthesis.
The association left parenthesis, 1, comma, 0, right parenthesis, right arrow, 7 is plotted with the point left parenthesis, 1, comma, 0, comma, 7, right parenthesis.
In general, the goal is to represent all points of the form left parenthesis, x, comma, y, comma, f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, right parenthesis for some pair of numbers x and y.

The resulting graph is shown below. The video shows this graph rotating, which hopefully will help you get a feel for the three-dimensional nature of it. You can also see the x, y-plane—which is now the input space—below the graph.

Khan Academy video wrapper

See video transcript

This means for any given point left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis on the plane, the vertical distance between that point and the graph indicates the value of f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis. That vertical direction is usually referred to as the z-direction, and the third axis which is perpendicular to the x, y-plane is called the z-axis.

As long as the value of f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis changes continuously as x and y change values, which is almost always the case in functions we deal with in practice, the graph ends up looking like some sort of surface.

Example 1: The bell curve

Function: f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, equals, e, start superscript, minus, left parenthesis, x, squared, plus, y, squared, right parenthesis, end superscript

Graph:

Let's analyze what's going on with this function. First, let's look inside the exponent of e, start superscript, minus, left parenthesis, x, squared, plus, y, squared, right parenthesis, end superscript and think about the value x, squared, plus, y, squared.

Question: How can you interpret the value x, squared, plus, y, squared?

Choose 1 answer:
(Choice A)
The distance between left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis and the origin left parenthesis, 0, comma, 0, right parenthesis in the input space
(Choice B)
The square of the distance between left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis and the origin left parenthesis, 0, comma, 0, right parenthesis in the input space
(Choice C)
The distance between an input left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis and the point of the graph it corresponds to
(Choice D)
The square of the distance between an input left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis and the point of the graph it corresponds to

[Show answer.]

When the point left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis is far from the origin, the function e, start superscript, minus, left parenthesis, x, squared, plus, y, squared, right parenthesis, end superscript will look like e, start superscript, start text, left parenthesis, s, o, m, e, space, b, i, g, space, n, e, g, a, t, i, v, e, space, n, u, m, b, e, r, right parenthesis, end text, end superscript, which is nearly zero. This means the distance between the graph and the x, y-plane at those points will be tiny. When x, equals, 0 and y, equals, 0, on the other hand, e, start superscript, minus, left parenthesis, x, squared, plus, y, squared, right parenthesis, end superscript, equals, e, start superscript, minus, 0, end superscript, equals, 1, which is what gives us the bulge in the middle.

Reflection Question: The graph above has rotational symmetry, in the sense that it will look the same if we rotate it in any way about the z-axis. Why is this?

[Show answer.]

Example 2: Waves

Function: f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, equals, cosine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, dot, sine, left parenthesis, y, right parenthesis

Graph:

One way to get an intuition for the function f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, equals, cosine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, sine, left parenthesis, y, right parenthesis—and multivariable functions in general—is to see what happens when one of the inputs is held constant.

For example, what happens when we fix the value of x to be 2? Usually, we are plotting all the points that look like this:

left parenthesis, x, comma, y, comma, cosine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, sine, left parenthesis, y, right parenthesis, right parenthesis, left arrow, start text, x, space, a, n, d, space, y, space, r, a, n, g, e, space, f, r, e, e, l, y, point, end text

By holding x constant at 2, we are limiting our view to points that look like this:

left parenthesis, 2, comma, y, comma, cosine, left parenthesis, 2, right parenthesis, sine, left parenthesis, y, right parenthesis, right parenthesis, left arrow, start text, O, n, l, y, space, y, space, r, a, n, g, e, s, space, f, r, e, e, l, y, point, end text

There is a very nice way to interpret this geometrically:

The points in space where x, equals, 2, which is to say all the points of the form left parenthesis, 2, comma, y, comma, z, right parenthesis, make up a plane. Why? Imagine slicing the graph with this plane. The points where the plane and the graph intersect—drawn in red above—are the points on our graph where x, equals, 2.

So why would this be helpful for understanding the graph?

We have basically turned the multivariable function f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, equals, cosine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, sine, left parenthesis, y, right parenthesis into a single variable function:

\begin{aligned} \quad g(y) &= \cos(2)\sin(y) \\ &\approx -0.42\sin(y) \end{aligned}

In fact, the curve we get from slicing the three-dimensional graph at x, equals, 2 has the same shape as the two-dimensional graph of g, left parenthesis, y, right parenthesis.

In this way, you can understand the three-dimensional graph of a multivariable function one slice at a time by holding one variable constant and looking at the resulting two-dimensional graph.

Example 3: One input, two outputs

You can also graph a function with a one-dimensional input and a two-dimensional output—although, for whatever reason, this is not commonly done.

Function: f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, left parenthesis, x, squared, comma, sine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, right parenthesis

Points plotted: left parenthesis, x, comma, x, squared, comma, sine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, right parenthesis

Graph:

In this case, only x runs freely, while the y and z values on the graph are both dependent on x.

If we rotate the image so we can look squarely at the x, y-plane, the graph looks like f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, x, squared. Another way to say this is that when we project the graph onto the x, y-plane, it gives the graph of f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, x, squared.

Similarly, rotating the image so that we're looking squarely at the x, z-plane makes the image look like the graph of f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, sine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis.

In other words, this function f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, left parenthesis, x, squared, comma, sine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, right parenthesis is a way to combine the two functions f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, x, squared and f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, sine, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis into one, and its graph captures the information of both in one image.

Limitations

As soon as you try to apply this process to functions with higher-dimensional inputs or outputs, you'll run out of dimensions which you can comfortably visualize.

For instance, consider the function f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, equals, left parenthesis, x, squared, comma, y, squared, right parenthesis with a two-dimensional input and a two-dimensional output. Graphing it would require four dimensions of space! This is because we would need to plot all points of the form left parenthesis, x, comma, y, comma, x, squared, comma, y, squared, right parenthesis.

[Attempt to visualize this four-dimensional graph]

In practice, when people think about graphs of higher dimensional functions, like f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, comma, z, right parenthesis, equals, x, squared, plus, y, squared, plus, z, squared, they usually start by considering graphs of some simpler function with a two-dimensional input and one-dimensional output like f, left parenthesis, x, comma, y, right parenthesis, equals, x, squared, plus, y, squared. This is a sort of conceptual prototype.

Such a prototype can help make sense out of certain operations, and can give you a feel for what starts to happen as your input space becomes multidimensional. At the end of the day, the actual computations are performed purely symbolically for the higher dimensional function.

Sort by:

Want to join the conversation?

Tanjim Hossain
Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to Tanjim Hossain's post “can anyone show me how ca...”
can anyone show me how can i plot these 3d graphs on matlab or mathematica or maxima or scilab or anyother app? :(
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(8 votes)
Answer
- muhammadYasirEjaz94
  Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to muhammadYasirEjaz94's post “Found the link below real...”
  Found the link below really helpful
  
  http://www.mathworks.com/company/newsletters/articles/using-matlabs-meshgrid-command-and-array-operators-to-implement-one-and-two-variable-functions.html
  Button navigates to signup page
  (8 votes)
Morris Callahan
Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to Morris Callahan's post “can you make everything a...”
can you make everything a little clearer? I am having trouble understanding
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(3 votes)
Answer
- SorbetOnion
  Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to SorbetOnion's post “In order to discriminate ...”
  In order to discriminate what each value (or set of values), when pumped into the function, will return, you must have one dimension per variable.
  
  Take this analogy: you have a bag of apples, and a bag of oranges. You want to express how many you gain per second, at any given second, and make a model of it. So you section the floor into "blocks" and label each block with a time. Then you take however many apples, and however many bananas that you gained and place a apple or banana in that section, respectively.
  We can't display how many apples AND bananas we gained by only placing apples in the marked off section: we need both apples AND bananas so people can discriminate between them, right? Same thing with a graph. We can't display two values with only one dimension: we need (at least) one dimension per value.
  All is great if we only have 2 or 3 values in total, but what happens when we get to 4? Or 5? Or 100? Can you imagine a 100 dimension grid? I can't.
  
  I hope I helped. Please tell me if I completely missed what you were struggling with.
  Comment on SorbetOnion's post “In order to discriminate ...”
  (7 votes)
matthewleetzeren95
Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to matthewleetzeren95's post “In the second paragraph u...”
In the second paragraph under the header 'Limitations', f(x,y) = (x^2,y^2) is said to be a function of two inputs and one output, while in the third paragraph, f(x,y,) = (x^2 + y^2) is said to be a function of two inputs and one output.

I don't understand the how f(x,y,) can represent either one output, or two. Also, I don't understand why different notation is used between (x^2,y^2) and (x^2 + y^2) if they are both two inputs. Sorry if the question is unclear or doesn't make sense!
Button navigates to signup pageComment on matthewleetzeren95's post “In the second paragraph u...”
(2 votes)
Answer
- oruchaslaman
  Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to oruchaslaman's post “Hi there, do not get conf...”
  Hi there, do not get confused, output is given in the form of f(x,y) this means that we are getting two outputs by putting the value of x and y in to the function, so this function produces two values one is x and y for each given or certain value of x and y. Eg: F(x,y) = sin(x) , tg (y) here I have independent values x and y this is so clear, to my function I am producing one sin(x) output for x values, and one tg (y) output for any y. Pay attention; If I write F(x,y) = sin(x).tg(y) in this case my function returns only one value for each given x and y. ( dot and semicolon)
  Comment on oruchaslaman's post “Hi there, do not get conf...”
  (4 votes)
Vega, Alina
Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to Vega, Alina's post “How do I learn benchmark ...”
How do I learn benchmark angles? I can't seem to understand it. Please help me Khan Academy Guirdians
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(3 votes)
Answer
barkho evan 👌
Posted 3 years ago. Direct link to barkho evan 👌's post “In example 3, what would ...”
In example 3, what would the image look like if we looked at it from the yz plain?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
- Jerry Nilsson
  Posted 3 years ago. Direct link to Jerry Nilsson's post “In the 𝑦𝑧-plane, the po...”
  In the 𝑦𝑧-plane, the points plotted are (𝑥², sin(𝑥)),
  which means that the curve would look like the functions
  𝑓₁(𝑥) = sin(√𝑥) and 𝑓₂(𝑥) = −sin(√𝑥).
  Button navigates to signup page
  (3 votes)
mlijah
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to mlijah's post “Shouldn’t the function wi...”
Shouldn’t the function with two outputs and one input, when looked at so only the x and z plane are visible, look like a sinusoidal function whose period decreases as distance from the origin increases?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
Raphael L
Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to Raphael L's post “In example 3, why would f...”
In example 3, why would f(x) = sin(x) outputs in xz plane ? Why not in xy, like f(x) = x² ?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
- sankalp yadav
  Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to sankalp yadav's post “because in xy plane onl...”
  because in xy plane only parabola is getting formed do a little math on this you will get it
  Button navigates to signup page
  (1 vote)
Kai Yuen Kwok
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Kai Yuen Kwok's post “"Such a prototype can hel...”
"Such a prototype can help make sense out of certain operations, and can give you a feel for what starts to happen as your input space becomes multidimensional."

Please elaborate. What operations are we talking about here?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
Akshay
Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to Akshay's post “In Example 3 one input th...”
In Example 3 one input three outputs how is the height of the spiral growing in height (seems to be growing) when it is a sin function moving in waves
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
- Kasper Trolle Borup
  Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to Kasper Trolle Borup's post “I also first thought it l...”
  I also first thought it looked that way, but it is just an "optical illusion". The square term for y = f(x) = x^2 grows very large fast and this can sort of give the impression, that z is also growing, when in reality, it is only y. It is just the viewing angle combined with having a single constant thickness line.
  Button navigates to signup page
  (1 vote)
Bruno Soares
Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to Bruno Soares's post “What is the difference be...”
What is the difference between a surface and curve? Thanks
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
- Nikolay Chervyakov
  Posted 7 years ago. Direct link to Nikolay Chervyakov's post “The curver is a curved li...”
  The curver is a curved line in the multi-dimentional space, while the surface typically has more dimensions. You've already seen 2-dimentional surfaces above. Also for example there exists an opinion that our universe is a 3-dimentional surface wrapping 4-dimentional sphere of space-time. I hope I gave you a clue :)
  Button navigates to signup page
  (1 vote)