Main content

### Course: Statistics and probability > Unit 7

Lesson 5: Randomness, probability, and simulation- Experimental versus theoretical probability simulation
- Theoretical and experimental probability: Coin flips and die rolls
- Random number list to run experiment
- Random numbers for experimental probability
- Interpret results of simulations
- Statistical significance of experiment

© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# Theoretical and experimental probability: Coin flips and die rolls

Probability tells us how likely something is to happen in the long run. We can calculate probability by looking at the outcomes of an experiment or by reasoning about the possible outcomes.

## Part 1: Flipping a coin

## Part 2: Rolling a die

## Want to join the conversation?

- How does probability relate to everyday life?(55 votes)
- Quantum Mechanics (small particles) obey rules driven by probability. Further more, this level of complexity comes in when considering fluid dynamics. Weather is driven by fluid dynamics, understanding river flows, economics, ecological systems. In fact, most "natural" or "living" systems that have been called chaotic are affected by probability.(37 votes)

- Has anyone here ACTUALLY had experimental results match your theorectical probability statement?(45 votes)
- It happens quite a bit. Go pick up a coin and flip it twice, checking for heads. Your theoretical probability statement would be Pr[H] = .5.

More than likely, you're going to get 1 out of 2 to be heads. That would be very feasible example of experimental probability matching theoretical probability.(42 votes)

- Just asking, does anyone know how this can relate to everyday life?

(I'm just curious) I don't see it myself so I'm looking if someone does.(4 votes)- At a restaurant, they use probability in an attempt to figure out how many guests will come in and dine on any given day. At the restaurant I work at, they use the amount of reservations for the day, and statistics from the past to come up with this probability. The amount of guests that might come in and dine will determine how many servers they will need to, and how many kitchen staff will be needed to provide for all of the guests. Every night their are servers "on call", and if the probability that "a lot" (my words, but their predictions are more accurate) of guests will come in means that they will call in more servers. And if "not a lot" a guests are expected to come in, then more servers (and kitchen staff) will not be called in, or some servers might be offered to take the night off.(46 votes)

- how do you answer question number PART 2(5 votes)
- There are six faces on a die and each face has the same probability (1 ∕ 6) of coming up whenever we roll the die.

This means that if we roll a die 60 times we can expect each of the six faces to come up an equal amount of times, which would be 60 ∕ 6 = 10.

Thereby we can say that as Dave is to roll a die 60 times, he should expect 10 of those rolls to show a 1.(16 votes)

- In QUESTION B, I don't understand where the 60 comes from(8 votes)
- The 60 was just an example used for the question. It was chosen because 60 is easily divisible by 6, making the question easier.(6 votes)

- can any one answer this question please. i need to understand this

a sensitive piece of electronic gear has a switch that fails on the average once every 100 missions engineers have devised a test which indicates defective 90 percent of the time if the switch is defective and non defective 99 percent of the time if it is okay the gear has failed, and it is found that the witch was tested and found defective. what is the probability that switch was indeed defective?(3 votes)- This is conditional probability.

The formula is P(A|B)(what you are trying to find) = P(A and B)/P(B)

With this question you want to find the probability that the switch is actually defective given that the test shows it as defective.

So you would need to find the probability the switch is actually defective AND the test shows it as defective. Then you divide it by the probability that the test shows it is defective.

The the probability the switch is actually defective AND the test shows it as defective is (.01)(.9) or .009

And the probability the test shows it as defective is (.01)(.9)+(.99)(.01)=.0189

Now you divide and you get 0.47619048 which is the probability the switch is actually defective given the test shows it is defective.

If this is hard to understand, try making a tree diagram.

Also anyone feel free to correct me if I am wrong, I am pretty sure I am right but I have only had one cup of coffee.(2 votes)

- So in experimental probability, you're just finding the probability of something showing up from the experiments, and theoretical is what should actually happen? Also, are the equations the same or different?(7 votes)
- I'm researching the probability/likelyhood that 2 or more of our local morning news casts (5 different TV broadcasting stations) would duplicate a story/topic. The average number of stories in a 30 minute show for all stations is ~ 10. The average number of duplicate stories over a 6 month period varies -- my semi-scientific tracking indicates a range of 3-5 are the same topic on 2 or more stations. I sense this is high.

I live in a state that encompasses 104K sq mi with 5.5 million residents. The 'fact' that 30-50% of the stories are duplicated across 2 - 5 channels gives me a sense that 1) there are a good deal of inactive reporters 2) channels share some type of news feed from which they select stories or 3) there's some sort of subjective selection occurring.. (the channels are fox, kwgn, abc, nbc and cbs affiliates)

Would you be so kind as to identify the first couple of steps of the approach I might use to begin to narrow down a legitimate estimated probability of duplicate stories based on the small amount of data I have collected?

Regards,

Sudsy(5 votes)- There are several "parent companies" that own most news stations. So the fact that news stories are duplicated on seemingly unrelated stations is most likely because the parent company chooses what stories are "worthy" of being reported on. This is one link I found. There are 5 main parent companies that own over 1/3 of the news stations.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/11/buying-spree-brings-more-local-tv-stations-to-fewer-big-companies/(4 votes)

- That you very much, I have learned the difference between the two probabilities in this, the videos, and the practices(6 votes)
- Well, It is possible to get a million heads in a row, its just really REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY unlikely, I calculated on Wolfram alpha and it was 1 in 10^10^5.4 aproximately. thats 301000 digits, but I guess anything is possible, right?(3 votes)
- Exactly!! That is the kind of spirit that more people need to develop. Just because something is unlikely doesn't mean it won't happen.(4 votes)