do the molecules of a gas exert an attractive force between each other

Good question! This is where things start getting interesting. You are right in saying that there is an attractive force between gas molecules, but for ideal gasses we ignore them and assume they don't impact anything (that's why they're "ideal"). Of course, sometimes, this causes problems. Deviations from the ideal gas law like these are covered in the next unit.

A few questions about pressure: 1. Is pressure = force / *total surface area* of the container? 2. Force is a vector quantity, so if we want the total force, shouldn't force to the right cancel with forces to the left? (Sorry if this is more focusing on physics) Thanx!:)

Pressure is force per unit of area. We're looking at each individual square of area (of whichever unit) and seeing how much force is being applied to each of those squares. If it's a gas then we assume the pressure is being exerted equally on the entire surface. Force is a vector but all of these forces are directed outward against the surface of the container so they're not opposing each other and therefore not canceling each other out. Hope that helps.

At 4:18 Sal explains that Pressure is proportional to Temperature because as the temperature increases, the velocity of the particles hitting the wall also speeds up, thereby increasing the pressure on the container. However, since the temperature is proportional to (mv^2)/2, wouldn't the velocity of the particles have a square root relationship to temperature. Thus shouldn't the pressure of the container also have a squared rooted relationship to temperature?

Pressure is directly proportional to temperature, or P α T. And temperature is directly proportional to kinetic energy where kinetic energy has the formula K.E. = (1/2)mv^(2). So we can say that temperature is directly proportional to the square of the particle's velocity, or T α v^(2). So therefore we can say that pressure is also directly proportional to the square of the particle's velocity through the transitive property, or P α v^(2). For some reason you're taking the square root of the temperature-velocity relationship, essentially getting sqrt(T) α v, and then saying that now the square root of temperature is directly proportional to pressure, or sqrt(T) α P. Which doesn't follow since there is no way to link the square root of temperature with pressure, except through velocity. We can do the same operation with the pressure-velocity relationship and say that sqrt(P) α v, and only know we can relate pressure and temperature together through the transitive property using velocity. This yields sqrt(P) α sqrt(T), where the square roots can be removed by squaring both sides yielding P α T. Which is just the original proportionality relationship. So, no pressure and temperature don't have a square root relationship. Hope that helps.

Main content

AP®︎/College Chemistry

Course: AP®︎/College Chemistry > Unit 3

Lesson 5: Kinetic molecular theory

Kinetic molecular theory and the gas laws

Name: Kinetic molecular theory and the gas laws
Uploaded: 2020-10-22T00:02:13Z
Description: The kinetic molecular theory (KMT) can be used to explain the macroscopic behavior of ideal gases. In this video, we'll see how the KMT accounts for the properties of gases as described by the various gas laws (Boyle's law, Gay-Lussac's law, Charles's law, Avogadro's law, and Dalton's law of partial pressures).

Google Classroom

The kinetic molecular theory (KMT) can be used to explain the macroscopic behavior of ideal gases. In this video, we'll see how the KMT accounts for the properties of gases as described by the various gas laws (Boyle's law, Gay-Lussac's law, Charles's law, Avogadro's law, and Dalton's law of partial pressures). Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

Sort by:

Tzviofen ✡
Posted 3 years ago. Direct link to Tzviofen ✡'s post “A few questions about pre...”
A few questions about pressure:
1. Is pressure = force / total surface area of the container?
2. Force is a vector quantity, so if we want the total force, shouldn't force to the right cancel with forces to the left?
(Sorry if this is more focusing on physics)
Thanx!:)
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(4 votes)
Answer
- Richard
  Posted 3 years ago. Direct link to Richard's post “Pressure is force per uni...”
  Pressure is force per unit of area. We're looking at each individual square of area (of whichever unit) and seeing how much force is being applied to each of those squares. If it's a gas then we assume the pressure is being exerted equally on the entire surface.
  
  Force is a vector but all of these forces are directed outward against the surface of the container so they're not opposing each other and therefore not canceling each other out.
  
  Hope that helps.
  Comment on Richard's post “Pressure is force per uni...”
  (8 votes)
m77299392
Posted a year ago. Direct link to m77299392's post “do the molecules of a gas...”
do the molecules of a gas exert an attractive force between each other
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(5 votes)
Answer
- Isaac
  Posted a year ago. Direct link to Isaac's post “Good question! This is wh...”
  Good question! This is where things start getting interesting. You are right in saying that there is an attractive force between gas molecules, but for ideal gasses we ignore them and assume they don't impact anything (that's why they're "ideal"). Of course, sometimes, this causes problems. Deviations from the ideal gas law like these are covered in the next unit.
  Button navigates to signup page
  (4 votes)
GForceSquared
Posted a year ago. Direct link to GForceSquared's post “At 4:18 Sal explains that...”
At
4:18
Sal explains that Pressure is proportional to Temperature because as the temperature increases, the velocity of the particles hitting the wall also speeds up, thereby increasing the pressure on the container. However, since the temperature is proportional to (mv^2)/2, wouldn't the velocity of the particles have a square root relationship to temperature. Thus shouldn't the pressure of the container also have a squared rooted relationship to temperature?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
- Richard
  Posted a year ago. Direct link to Richard's post “Pressure is directly prop...”
  Pressure is directly proportional to temperature, or P α T. And temperature is directly proportional to kinetic energy where kinetic energy has the formula K.E. = (1/2)mv^(2). So we can say that temperature is directly proportional to the square of the particle's velocity, or T α v^(2). So therefore we can say that pressure is also directly proportional to the square of the particle's velocity through the transitive property, or P α v^(2).
  
  For some reason you're taking the square root of the temperature-velocity relationship, essentially getting sqrt(T) α v, and then saying that now the square root of temperature is directly proportional to pressure, or sqrt(T) α P. Which doesn't follow since there is no way to link the square root of temperature with pressure, except through velocity. We can do the same operation with the pressure-velocity relationship and say that sqrt(P) α v, and only know we can relate pressure and temperature together through the transitive property using velocity. This yields sqrt(P) α sqrt(T), where the square roots can be removed by squaring both sides yielding P α T. Which is just the original proportionality relationship. So, no pressure and temperature don't have a square root relationship.
  
  Hope that helps.
  Button navigates to signup page
  (6 votes)

Video transcript

- [Sal] In other videos, we touched on the notion of kinetic molecular theory, which I'll just shorten as KMT. And it's just this idea that if you imagine a container, I'll just draw it in 2-dimensions here, that it contains some gas, you can imagine the gas as being these particles where their collective volume is much smaller than the volume of the container. And the temperature we're dealing with is related to the average kinetic energy of the particles. These particles are all moving around, zooming around, and they each would have some kinetic energy. Remember, kinetic energy, you calculate that as MV squared over two. So, each of these particles would have some mass and some velocity, but they could all have different velocities for sure, even if they're the same type of particle. And if they're different types of particles, they can have different masses as well. But, the average of these kinetic energies across all of these particles, that is proportional to temperature when measured in Kelvin. And pressure, the pressure, remember, pressure is nothing but force per unit area. And so, you can imagine this surface of our container, this could be some type of a cube so I can draw it in 3-dimensions here, so there's some area over here. And you have your particles, let me do this in a different color, these particles are constantly bouncing off of it and there's way more particles then what I have drawn here, so at any given moment, you're having some particles that are bouncing off of this side of the container, actually all sides of the container. And these are perfectly elastic collisions, they're preserving kinetic energy. And so, they're applying some force, collectively, on this area, so the pressure is because of these particle collisions on the surface. Now, what I wanna do in this video is take these ideas that we conceptualize in kinetic molecular theory and to understand why the ideal gas law, PV is equal to nRT, make sense when we conceptualize the world here. Just a reminder, P is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles of whatever gas we're dealing with, the amount of that gas, and then T is the temperature in Kelvin, and R is just the ideal gas constant, that's just whatever constant you're doing, so that the units all work out together. So, let's first think about how pressure relates to volume if we were to old everything else constant. Well, the idea gas law tells us that pressure times volume is going to be equal to this, if we hold it at constant, I can even just write a K here for constant, but that would also mean we could divide, let's say both sides by V, we can say that pressure is equal to some constant over V. Another way to think about it is is that pressure is proportional to the inverse of volume. You could also write this, if we divide both sides by P, is that volume is proportional to the inverse of pressure. Does that make sense from a kinetic molecular theory point of view? Pause this video and think about it. Well, imagine we have our original cube right over here. And I had the same number of particles, they have the same average kinetic energy, but let's say I were to increase the volume. So, if I were to make the volume go up, so I were to some how expand this, or maybe put the exact number, the same particles with the same temperature, in a larger container, then at any given moment, you're just gonna have fewer bounces of particles off of the container. Because they just have more room to go in that volume, and even the surface area of the container is going to be high as well. So, it makes sense that if the volume goes up, the pressure is going to go down. And you can think about it the other way. If you make this smaller, that same number of particles with the same average kinetic energy, they're just gonna bump into the container that much more often. And that's going to increase the pressure, so volume goes down, pressure goes up. And this relationship, that pressure is inversely proportional to volume, or vice versa, if you hold everything else constant, that's often known as Boyle's law. Now, another relationship, what if we were to hold volume and the number of moles constant, and we wanna think about the relationship between pressure and temperature. Well, this is constant, this constant, and this is constant, the ideal gas law would say that pressure is going to be proportional to temperature or that temperature's proportional to pressure. Does that make sense? Well, let's go back to our original container. If you were to increase the temperature, that means that the average kinetic energy is increased. That means that these particles, when they hit the side of the container, they're going to hit it with more velocity. That means that you're going to have, at any given moment, you're gonna have more pressure exerted on the side of the container. And you could go the other way. Think about lowering the temperature, so the kinetic energy goes really low, then these particles are just slowly drifting. And the speed with which they are hitting the side of the container is going to go down and so the pressure would go down. So, it completely makes sense, if temperature goes up, pressure goes up, if temperature goes down, pressure goes down, and this is often known as Gay-Lussac's law. Now, another relationship, and I'm really just going through all of the combinations over here, what if we were to hold pressure and the number of molecules constant? So, we're really looking at the relationship between volume and temperature. So, once again, if P, n, and R is always constant, if those are constant, the ideal gas law would tell us that the volume is proportional to the temperature, once again, holding everything else constant. Well, to think about that you can go through that same thought experiment we just had. If we increase the temperature, if these things are moving around faster, if you want to have the same amount of force per area on the container, on the side of the container, you're going to have to increase the volume. So, this relationship, which is completely consistent with kinetic molecular theory, is often known as Charles's law. Now, another one is the relationship between volume and the number of moles. If everything else is held constant, the ideal gas law would tell us that volume is going to be proportional to the number of moles of our particle, or of our gas that we are dealing with. And that makes sense 'cause, once again, you're holding everything else constant, you want pressure to be constant, temperature to be constant. If I were to double the number of particles here, but I don't wanna change the pressure or the temperature, makes sense that I would have to double the volume. Likewise, if I wanted to double the volume here and I didn't wanna change the pressure or the temperature, I would have to put twice as many particles in there, so I still have sufficient number of interactions of bouncing of the particles with the sides of the container, so that I have sufficient pressure. And this notion is called Avogadro's law. Last but not least, let's say I have two identical containers. I have two identical containers, that's one there, that's one over here, actually I'm gonna draw that same container a third time. And let's say over here, I have gas one and in this case, it has some pressure due to gas one, we're gonna assume the volume and the temperatures are the same across all three of these. And let's say we have gas two and it is exerting pressure too, if I were to take all of the gas in both of them, and put them both into this third container, so this third container is gonna have all of the original of gas one and all of the original of gas two, but we aren't changing the volume and we aren't changing the temperature. In any given unit area on the surface of the container, you're gonna get the collisions from particle one, which would give you P1 in that force per unit area and you're going to get the collisions from particle two, which would give you that force per unit area. So, it makes sense that the partial pressures would add up to be equal to the total pressure in the container. And this is known as Dalton's law. But, the whole point of this video is just appreciate that everything we've talked about with the ideal gas law, actually makes a lot of sense, I would argue it makes the most sense, when you think about it in terms of kinetic molecular theory.