If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Hess's law

Hess's law states that if a process can be expressed as the sum of two or more steps, the enthalpy change for the overall process is the sum of the ΔH values for each step. To use Hess's law, two principles must be understood: one, if an equation is reversed, the sign of the ΔH value is also reversed. Two, if an equation is multiplied by a coefficient, the ΔH value is multiplied by the same coefficient. Created by Jay.

Want to join the conversation?

  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user Serena Cheng
    At , how come the answer is not +226.8 kJ/molrxn? Isn't +1299.6 + (-787) + (-285.8)= 226.8 and not -226.8?
    (12 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers ultimate style avatar for user connorJung10
    Getting to a point where you can utilize Hess's Law just seems to convenient. How do chemists find equations that cancel out perfectly to get to that point?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf red style avatar for user Richard
      Chemists have recorded the enthalpy changes for most simple reactions using various calorimetry experimental techniques. Using Hess’ law we only need to experimentally determine the enthalpy of a relatively small number of the most simple reactions which then allows us to calculate the enthalpies of vast number of complex reactions.

      For example here the actual reaction we want to know the enthalpy of is reacting solid carbon (graphite) with hydrogen gas to produce acetylene. So, we need a few simpler reactions which has graphite, hydrogen gas, and acetylene. And the three lower reactions involving those chemicals which we know the enthalpies of are about as simple as you can get in an experimental setting. All that is happening with those lower equations is that we’re reacting the desired chemicals with oxygen gas (essentially burning them) and observing the enthalpy change.

      Hope that helps.
      (4 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Lawrence Liu
    Why exactly is reversing equations necessary?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • male robot johnny style avatar for user irene.manakas
    At why are we allowed to cancel out the products and reactants that appear on both sides of the chemical equation? On the one hand, it makes sense to cancel them, because if an amount of a chemical species was used up and then the same amount was also produced, you could argue that it's like, it was never there to begin with. However, on the other hand, couldn't you also argue that if that chemical species (that appears both as a reactant and a product) wasn't there, then the reaction might not happen?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user nderoche
    Why are we reversing the step when the arrow of the reaction would indicate that the step only goes in one direction (In this case the Acetylene ) is being assembled instead of broken apart because the direction of said arrow stays the same, but this doesn't make any sense to me because it's not being communicated that the equation applies in both instances.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- [Instructor] Hess's law states that the overall change in enthalpy for a chemical reaction is equal to the sum of the enthalpy changes for each step. And this is independent of the path taken. So it doesn't matter what set of reactions you use. If you add up those reactions and they equal the reaction that you're trying to find, you can also sum the enthalpies to find the enthalpy change for the reaction. As an example, let's say we're trying to find the change in enthalpy for the reaction of carbon with hydrogen gas to form C2H2, which is acetylene. We can calculate the change in enthalpy for the formation of acetylene using these three reactions below. Our approach will involve looking at these three reactions and comparing them to the original reaction to see if we need to change anything. For example, if we look at reaction one, there's one mole of acetylene on the left side of the equation. And if we compare that to the original reaction, there's one mole of acetylene on the right side of the equation. So we need to reverse equation one to make it look more like our original reaction. To save time, I've gone ahead and reversed equation one. So you can see, I did that down here. Looking at the original equation for equation one, here where the products and now we've made those products the reactants. And what were the reactants over here for equation one have now become the products. The change in enthalpy for equation one is -1,299.6 kilojoules per mole of reaction. Kilojoules per mole reaction just means how the reaction is written in the balanced equation. And since we reversed equation one, we also need to reverse the sign for Delta H. So instead of this being a negative, instead of this being a negative, we're gonna go ahead and change this into a positive. And also let's go ahead and cross out the first equation. So we don't get confused. Next, we look at equation two and we compare it to our original. For equation two there's one mole of solid carbon on the left side and looking at our original reaction, there's two moles of carbon on the left side. So to get equation two, to look like our original equation we need to multiply everything through, by a factor of two. So we're gonna multiply everything in equation two by a factor of two. To save some time, I have gone ahead and written out what we would get. We would get two carbons plus two O2s goes to 2CO2. The change in the enthalpy for the formation of one mole of CO2 was -393.5 kilojoules per mole of reaction. But now we're forming two moles of CO2. And since we multiplied the equation through by a factor of two, we also need to multiply the change in enthalpy by a factor of two as well. And also let's go ahead and cross out this first version here because now we're forming two moles of CO2. Next, we look at equation three and we can see there's one mole of hydrogen gas on the left side of the equation which matches the original reaction which also has one mole of hydrogen gas on the left side. So we don't need to do anything to equation three. And since we're not doing anything to the equation, we're also not gonna do anything to the change in the enthalpy. So it's gonna stay -285.8 kilojoules per mole of reaction. Next we add up all of our reactants and products. So we have two CO2 plus H2O plus 2C plus 2O2 plus H2 plus one half O2. So those are all written down here for our reactants. And then for the products, let me just change colors here. We have C2H2 plus 5O2 plus 2CO2 plus H2O. And so those are written over here for the products. Next we see what we can cancel out. There's 2CO2 on the left side and there's 2CO2 on the right side. So those cancel out. There's one water on the left and one water on the right. And there's 2O2s plus one half O2 which is 2.5O2s or five halves O2s. So the oxygen's cancel out on both sides as well. And we can see we're left with two carbons plus one hydrogen goes to form one C2H2 which is the same as our original equation. Since we were able to add up our equations and get the overall equation, according to Hess's law, we should also be able to add the changes in enthalpies for these steps to get the change in the enthalpy for the overall reaction. If we look at the changes in enthalpy for the individual steps, we had +1299.6 for the first equation. And so that's up here. For the second equation we had negative 393.5 times two, which is -787. And for our third equation, we had -285.8. So that's -285.8. When we add everything together we get +226.8 kilojoules per mole of reaction. So for the formation of one mole of acetylene from two moles of carbon and one mole of hydrogen the change in enthalpy for this reaction is equal to +226.8 kilojoules per mole of reaction.