If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Population diversity and resilience

Biodiversity plays a critical role in the survival of populations, with genetic diversity providing resilience against environmental changes. The higher the genetic diversity in a population, the more resilient the population is to environmental change. This resilience ensures the survival and reproduction of populations, underscoring the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

  • leafers tree style avatar for user 🌷🌻aylinkacar🍄🌸
    Are animals that change their camouflage more diverse than animals that do not? Like for example, a lizard that changes color for camoflauge.
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • mr pink green style avatar for user Katy
      Generally no, however it is possible that a species that can change their color is more genetically diverse than other species. To answer the question: The ability of INDIVIDUALS to change color does not make the POPULATION more genetically diverse. These are two unrelated facts, one doesn't cause the other.

      In biology, a POPULATION of individuals is more resilient when it is more diverse, is referring to genetic diversity. GENETIC DIVERSITY is when individuals in that population have different variations of the same gene (AKA: different genotypes and phenotypes). Like skin color: some humans have darker or lighter skin than other. When talking about a POPULATION and GENETIC DIVERSITY, biologist are referring to the population as whole and what genes the next generations will inherit. The number of times or colors that one individual can change their color, or if all individuals can is not relevant. What would be relevant is if some individuals could change color and others couldn't.
      (8 votes)
  • starky tree style avatar for user G9463521
    Is it possible for certain environmental changes to be detailed a certain way so no members of a species die off?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- [Instructor] So let's imagine that each of these little circles here, represent a member of a population of bugs. And, we have two different population of bugs. You could view this as population one on the left side of this orange line and population two on the right side of this orange line. And these bugs, we're gonna think about just one trait, their color, because it's easy to visualize. And let's say that their color generally helps them camouflage from predators. So this kind of cloudy, white, and black, and green layer, that's maybe the environment that they're in, where you might find them. Maybe it's the surface of a moss covered tree or something like that. And these are two separate populations of maybe a related species, or maybe the same species, but they're two different populations that are not intermixing. Now the first question is, which of these these populations has more genetic diversity? Well, on the left here, we see that they're all the same color. It looks like a pretty useful color. It seems to hide them pretty well, camouflaged them pretty well. On the right here, it's clear that there's more different types of colors. Some of them are roughly the same color as what we see on the left hand side, but some of them are good bit darker and some of them are good bit lighter. So the one on the right, the population on the right has more diversity. Now, one could argue that some of these very bright circles or some of these darker circles, might be more susceptible to predators, and that actually might be the case. But what we're gonna think about in this video is not how many members of the population may be more or less susceptible to predators, what we're gonna think about is, does the diversity help us when there might be some type of changes to the environment? Does it make the population as a whole more resilient? I'm not talking about any individual member of the population. And to imagine that, let's imagine that there's some type of environmental change, maybe there's pollution in the area that makes the surfaces that these little bugs have to live on a good bit darker. So maybe the surfaces look like this. So now what's likely to happen? Well, in this reality, all of the bugs on our left hand side are now more visible to predators. And so you can imagine the predators might be able to pick off a lot more of them. Or in an extreme case, maybe able to finish them off all together, while on the right some of the members of the population are easier to pick off, like that one, and that one, and that one, and that one. While some other members of the population are even more camouflaged than they were before. Like that one, and that one, and that one. And so the population because of its diversity, yes, a lot of them might die off, they might be picked off by predators, but it looks like there's a subset of the right population, that is gonna be more likely to survive and then they can continue to reproduce. And so you won't have the entire population dying off. And you could imagine it the other way around. Let's say instead of the environment getting somehow darker, imagine if the environment got somehow lighter, something like that? Well, you see a similar phenomenon. All the ones on the left are now very similarly visible, and maybe the predators could pick them off, while on the right, some of them have become a lot more visible. In this case the darker ones are now super-visible. The predators might be able to pick them off and even some of the medium colored. But there's a good number of them that now blend in quite well, like that one, and that one, and I can't even see them that well, they're blending in so well. And so once again, there's certain members of the populations that because of this more diversity, they are more likely to be able to survive some type of environmental perturbation. And so since they are more likely to survive, the entire population is less likely to be killed off. So the population as a whole is more resilient. Not saying that every member of the population is more resilient, but the population as a whole. So the general takeaway here is that more diversity leads to more environmental resilience, or resilience to changes in the environment. Once again, we're not talking about every individual member of the population being more resilient. We're talking about the population as a whole being able to survive in some way, and then keep carrying on.