- AC analysis intro 1
- AC analysis intro 2
- Trigonometry review
- Sine and cosine come from circles
- Sine of time
- Sine and cosine from rotating vector
- Lead Lag
- Complex numbers
- Multiplying by j is rotation
- Complex rotation
- Euler's formula
- Complex exponential magnitude
- Complex exponentials spin
- Euler's sine wave
- Euler's cosine wave
- Negative frequency
- AC analysis superposition
- Impedance vs frequency
- ELI the ICE man
- Impedance of simple networks
- KVL in the frequency domain
AC analysis intro 2
Here's a preview of how AC analysis is going to work. To get ready we need to review some of the ideas from trig and complex numbers. Created by Willy McAllister.
Want to join the conversation?
- what is s? In the previous videos it is -1/RC, -R/L, -alpha-sqrt(alpha squared - omega squared), in this video i tried to substitute s by trial and error using those formula above to get Vin but somehow i cant justify my equation.(3 votes)
- The solution for s is different for every circuit. You can't "borrow" a solution from another circuit, unless it has the same components and same connections. You CAN use the same solution if the only difference is the component values.(5 votes)
- It is almost like electricity has its own kind of math, which uses all the regular math combined.(3 votes)
- Because you constrained the input to sinusoidal form, Does the voltage of a voltage input source usually take the form of a sinusoidal wave?(1 vote)
- Yes. We use sine sources when doing AC analysis of a system.
When you go to build a real useful system, the inputs are necessarily sines, but there's beautiful theory (Fourier Series and Fourier Transforms and Laplace Transforms) that lets us view real-world signals as a collection of sines.(2 votes)
- at3:54after all the signs to all circuit elements have been added, it ended-up with like signs in the node between the voltage source and the inductor, and like signs in the node between the voltage source and the capacitor.
Is this correct?(1 vote)
- Yes, and no. Technically, the polarity should be the other way, but it really doesn't matter. I'll explain why:
If you notice, at3:53he stated when putting the signs across the voltage he's giving it simply "that polarity", which is to say that he is giving an arbitrary polarity for now as a place holder.
This is still correct because the voltage source may very well be that polarity, or it may be the other way around. It is sinusoidal so it will change with time. As will the polarities of the components. This change is not completely instantaneous, (I believe it may be at the speed of light) so it may very well be the polarity at the instant that the source has changed voltages!
:) Hope I did not confuse anything.(2 votes)
- Can this 'impedance' equation be used for RC, RL and LC circuits also where L, C and R are 0, respectively?(1 vote)
- Impedance concepts apply to combinations of R, L, and C. This is covered in an upcoming video, "Impedance of simple networks".(1 vote)
- Hi, At the0:23you wrote this "1/C" in the equation at the natural response. Then, at the4:33, you put the "s" and becomes 1/sC. So, why is that?(1 vote)
- This is an intro video, so it represents a broad overview. I didn't justify how C turns into 1/sC. If you want to jump ahead, take a look at the Impedance video (https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-circuit-analysis-topic/ee-ac-analysis/v/ee-impedance).
If that's doesn't make sense then I highly recommend you work through all the videos in this section.(1 vote)
- [Voiceover] So in the last video we started working on the analysis of an RLC circuit that had a forcing function, and the math for doing that gets really hard. And so what we decided to do was see what happens if we limit ourselves to using just sinusoidal inputs, inputs that look like sines and cosines. So I wanna continue the introduction to the sinusoidal analysis technique and just give you a preview of where we're headed with that. So when we make this limitation to sinusoidal inputs, there's a big prize at the end. And the prize is that the differential equations turn into algebra. That's the reason we're doing this. It just basically because really simple, just like the resistor circuits that we used to do, they were all algebra. There was no calculus. We're gonna turn these kinds of differential equation circuits into algebra. So if we're able to convert this circuit into an algebra problem instead of a differential equation, that means we could use Kirchhoff's Voltage Law. We could use Kirchhoff's Current Law. We could use node voltage. The node voltage method or the mesh current method. Just like we did for resistors. And this whole set of techniques then automatically gets applied to circuits that have inductors and capacitors in them, just like we learned how to do with resistors. It's a major simplification. So let me draw this circuit over here again real quick, the one we were looking at earlier. We have V. We have an inductor here. We have a resistor and a capacitor. So for V, in, we're gonna limit ourselves to just sinusoids. So that means that the input is gonna look something like A cosine, omega t plus phi. Phi is a phase angle. And we're gonna represent this in a way that looks like this. This is gonna get transformed or changed into something that looks like this. It's gonna be called A at the angle of phi. This is an angle symbol. And this is referred to as a phasor. This has a name this way of writing. This way of writing down sinusoids. If I have a sinusoid that looks like this is a function of time, I could write it as a phasor where I say V equals A at an angle of phi and understood is that there's this omega t term, this cosine omega t term nearby. So the other thing we're gonna learn about is how to transform a circuit. So we can use this sinusoidal steady state analysis. So the inductor, it gets transformed from L, instead we write down SL, where S is that same natural frequency. Whenever we have a resistor, we write down just R, just like we usually do, and whenever we have a capacitor, we write one over SC, and again, this S is the same thing as we had before, the natural frequency. And in a future video, we'll justify why we could make this transformation and what this means. The big payoff here is I'm gonna write a KVL equation around this loop and watch what happens. Watch how easy this is, it's amazing. So let me real quick I'm gonna just indicate signs of these voltages. There's the inductor voltage. There's the resistor voltage. There's the capacitor voltage. And here's the voltage on V, in. Like that, we'll give it that polarity. It's not obvious yet, but I get to use these quantities, SL and one over SC, just like they were a resistance value in Ohm's Law. And watch how this happens. I'm just gonna write KVL around this loop. And what I get is that V, in is equal to the voltage across the inductor plus the resistor plus the capacitor, and I can write it like this. I can write SL times i plus R times i plus one over SC times i. And if I can write that again, I'll write that one more time, it's i times SL plus R plus one over SC. All right, that was a straightforward application of Kirchhoff's Law. Now if we look at this expression here, look at this right here, this is the characteristic equation. We just wrote down the characteristic equation. Characteristic. We just wrote down the characteristic equation of this circuit using these transformed components. Now what I wanna do next, we're gonna actually get a new concept. I can write an equation like this. I can say V, in, divided by i, I'm just gonna take i over this side of the equation here, equals SL plus R plus one over SC. This is an interesting idea. Here is a ratio, right here. This is a ratio of voltage to current. Now if this was just a plain resistor, V over i for a plain ole resistor, is what, is R. That's an expression of Ohm's Law. So now I have another expression over here for something that's written in terms of my component values and this natural, this frequency S that's going on in here, and this is gonna lead us to a general idea of resistance that is called impedance. So that's what this is right here. This is this ratio of voltage to current and the symbol usually used for impedance is a Z. So this is where we're headed over the next several videos. To justify what we're doing here, we need to go through some steps, and so what we're gonna do in the next couple of videos is we're gonna do some review. So here are the things we're gonna review. We're gonna review some trigonometry. So cosine and sine and those functions and what they mean, especially when they're functions of time. We're also gonna review Euler's identity. Euler's identity is important, because it's the thing that allows us to relate e to the jx and we get some sort of relationship to sine of x and cosine of x. And if you remember when we were solving differential equations, this was always the form that was the easiest solution to come up with, e to the something. And if we're limiting ourselves to sines and cosines for inputs, we need to have a way to make a really easy way to solve equations. So Euler's identity is the trigger that allows us to do that. Now when we use Euler's identity, we're gonna get this little complex number that keeps coming up. So we're gonna review complex numbers. That's the three review topics. And then we're gonna move on and we're gonna do after that, we'll define something like these phasors. Then we'll look at the transformation. So that's SL and R and one over SC. Phasor is the idea where we change a cosine into something at a phase angle. And then finally what we get to do is we get to solve. So that's the sequence of events. That's what's coming up over the next couple of videos. It's a really powerful technique for handling some very complicated circuits and getting it to do what we want.