Main content

### Course: Electrical engineering > Unit 2

Lesson 4: Natural and forced response- Capacitor i-v equations
- A capacitor integrates current
- Capacitor i-v equation in action
- Inductor equations
- Inductor kickback (1 of 2)
- Inductor kickback (2 of 2)
- Inductor i-v equation in action
- RC natural response - intuition
- RC natural response - derivation
- RC natural response - example
- RC natural response
- RC step response - intuition
- RC step response setup (1 of 3)
- RC step response solve (2 of 3)
- RC step response example (3 of 3)
- RC step response
- RL natural response
- Sketching exponentials
- Sketching exponentials - examples
- LC natural response intuition 1
- LC natural response intuition 2
- LC natural response derivation 1
- LC natural response derivation 2
- LC natural response derivation 3
- LC natural response derivation 4
- LC natural response example
- LC natural response
- LC natural response - derivation
- RLC natural response - intuition
- RLC natural response - derivation
- RLC natural response - variations

© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# RLC natural response - variations

The RLC natural response falls into three categories: overdamped, critically damped, and underdamped. Written by Willy McAllister.

## Introduction

The natural response of a resistor-inductor-capacitor circuit $(\text{RLC)}$ can take on three different forms, depending on the specific component values.

In two prior articles, we covered an intuitive description of how the $\text{RLC}$ behaves, and did a formal derivation where we modeled the circuit with a $2$ nd-order differential equation and solved a specific example circuit. In this article, we look closely at the characteristic equation and give names to the various solutions.

### What we're building to

The $\text{RLC}$ characteristic equation is:

We will solve for the roots of the characteristic equation using the quadratic formula:

By substituting variables $\alpha $ and ${\omega}_{o}$ we can write $s$ a little simpler as:

where,

*damping factor*and

*resonant frequency*.

Depending on the relative size of $\alpha $ and ${\omega}_{o}$ , there will be $i(t)$ ,

**three**different forms of the solution for- overdamped,
, leads to the sum of two decaying exponentials$\alpha >{\omega}_{0}$ - critically damped,
, gives$\alpha ={\omega}_{0}$ times a decaying exponential$t$ - underdamped,
, leads to a decaying sine$\alpha <{\omega}_{0}$

### Modeling and solving the circuit - review

In a previous article we created and solved a $2$ nd-order differential equation modeling the $\text{RLC}$ circuit. That equation looks like this:

We proposed a solution with an exponential form (which worked out really nicely for us), and came up with what is called the

*characteristic equation*with this form:We solved for $s$ , the roots of the $\text{RLC}$ characteristic equation, using the quadratic formula,

By substituting variables $\alpha $ and ${\omega}_{o}$ we wrote $s$ a little simpler as:

where
$\alpha ={\displaystyle \frac{\text{R}}{2\text{L}}},$ and ${\omega}_{o}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{\text{LC}}}}$

We revised our proposed solution to have this form,

We now take a close look at the expression for $s$ , the roots of the $\text{RLC}$ characteristic equation, and the impact it has on the solution for $i$ .

## Exact solution

If we want an exact answer for particular values of $\text{R}$ , $\text{L}$ , and $\text{C}$ , we perform a computation like the one we did in the previous article for the example circuit. Alternatively, we can enter the circuit into a circuit simulator to help us find a result.

### Overdamped, critically damped, underdamped

We can get an impression of the full richness of the natural response by looking three possible outcomes in a qualitative sense.

The solution for $s$ depends on the sign of the subtraction that happens under the square root term in the equation:

How the roots turn out:

relation | sign of | nickname | |
---|---|---|---|

overdamped | 2 real roots | ||

critically damped | 2 repeated roots | ||

underdamped | 2 complex roots |

How the response turns out, $i(t)$ :

relation | sign of | nickname | |
---|---|---|---|

overdamped | 2 decaying exponentials | ||

critically damped | |||

underdamped | decaying sine |

If your engineering studies take you into the area of Control Theory, these terms are used to describe how dynamic systems act. For example, the motion of a robot's arm can be described by a second-order differential equation. If your ask your robot to quickly reach for an object, you can describe how its hand moves using these words.

Let's take a look at the three possible outcomes in a bit more detail.

${\alpha}^{2}-{\omega}^{2}>0{\textstyle \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}}$ overdamped

Under this condition, the ${\omega}_{o}^{2}$ term is small relative to ${\alpha}^{2}$ , so we know the expression inside the square root will be positive. We also know the square root expression will be smaller than $\alpha $ . This means $s$ will be two real numbers, both negative.

(Convince yourself that ${s}_{1}$ and ${s}_{2}$ will both be negative.)

The current will be the superposition of two real exponentials that both decay to zero.

The circuit is said to be

*over*damped because two superimposed exponentials are both driving the the current to zero. A circuit will be overdamped if the resistance is high relative to the resonant frequency.${\alpha}^{2}-{\omega}^{2}=0{\textstyle \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}}$ critically damped

The boundary between underdamped and overdamped is when $\alpha ={\omega}_{o}$ . The damping factor and the resonant frequency are in balance, and the terms under the square root subtract to $0$ . The roots of the characteristic equation, $s$ , are two identical real numbers, called

*repeated roots:*Solving a $2$ nd-order differential equation with repeated roots is a bit tricky. I'm not going to do the derivation here, but instead I refer you to a great video Sal did on solving repeated roots. Welcome back ... With repeated roots, the answer is an exponential term multiplied by $t$ .

This response is said to be

*critically damped*.${\alpha}^{2}-{\omega}^{2}<0{\textstyle \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}}$ underdamped

When $\alpha $ is smaller than ${\omega}_{o}$ , the square root term has a negative number inside, and $s$ comes out as two complex conjugate numbers, with real and imaginary parts. The example circuit we worked out in the RLC natural response derivation article is an underdamped system.

The current looks like a sine wave that diminishes over time. Think of the sound a bell makes when you strike it. The bell's note rings out and fades over time. That is an ${\omega}_{o}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{\text{LC}}}}.$

*underdamped*second-order mechanical system. For second-order electrical circuits, we borrow the term and say the underdamped system "rings" at a frequency of approximatelyIf we let the resistance get really small and eventually go to $0$ , then $\alpha =\text{R}/2\text{L}$ goes to zero and ${s}_{1,2}$ becomes ${\omega}_{o}$ . The circuit becomes a pure $\text{LC}$ configuration. When we analyzed the natural response of the LC circuit, we came up with a sine wave that lasted forever. (In real life, $\text{R}$ is never really $0$ , so there is always some energy lost. A bell does not ring forever.)

The first example circuit we worked through earlier in this article had $\text{R}=2{\textstyle \phantom{\rule{0.167em}{0ex}}}\mathrm{\Omega},\text{L}=1{\textstyle \phantom{\rule{0.167em}{0ex}}}\text{H},$ and $\text{C}=1/5{\textstyle \phantom{\rule{0.167em}{0ex}}}\text{F}.$

We're not going to repeat the solution, but here are a few observations using the $\alpha $ and ${\omega}_{o}$ notation.

The damping factor $\alpha $ is

The resonant frequency, ${\omega}_{o}$ is

Looking at the terms under the square root:

## Summary

The $\text{RLC}$ circuit is the electronic equivalent of a swinging pendulum with friction.
The circuit can be modeled by this $2$ nd-order linear differential equation:

The resulting characteristic equation is:

We solved for the roots of the characteristic equation using the quadratic formula:

By substituting variables $\alpha $ and ${\omega}_{o}$ we wrote $s$ a little simpler as:

where
$\alpha ={\displaystyle \frac{\text{R}}{2\text{L}}},$ and ${\omega}_{o}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{\text{LC}}}}$

Depending on the relative size of $\alpha $ and ${\omega}_{o}$ , we came up with three different forms of the solution:

- overdamped,
, leads to the sum of two decaying exponentials$\alpha >{\omega}_{0}$ - critically damped,
, leads to$\alpha ={\omega}_{0}$ times decaying exponential$t$ - underdamped,
, leads to a decaying sine$\alpha <{\omega}_{0}$

## Want to join the conversation?

- how to get the equation for i=

V0/W0*e−αt*t in crirically damped?(4 votes)- From the author:Jonathan is correct. The expression for current should be i = V0/L t e^(-at). This has been corrected in the article. The article still just states the result, without derivation.

Inspired by Jonathan's solution in this clarification, I wrote up this more complete derivation of the Critically Damped case:

http://spinningnumbers.org/a/rlc-natural-response-variations.html#critically-damped

This website is a continuation of the EE contributions I made at KA.(2 votes)

- why do you get barely any questions, tips, or thanks on your electrical engineering section?

on other sections, i see over 100 questions but on this section, i hardly ever see 10(2 votes)- There are lots of questions scattered throughout the EE subject area. You can see them if you add a /d at the end of the url, like this: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/d(3 votes)

- If I add a SPDT switch in the circuit, I can charge the capacitor. But if there is one way to charge without the switch. (For exmaple, I add a battery and it will work and form same-frequncy wave until battery does not have any energy)(1 vote)
- Providing an initial charge to a capacitor or initial current to an inductor is a tricky bit of work in a circuit simulator. It is difficult to implement a mechanical switch. They are usually not part of the simulator's primitive elements.

It's possible to mimic a mechanical switch using very large transistors. I show an example of this on my web site, spinningnumbers.org. This is a follow-on to my work at KA where all the articles are updated. If you navigate to the Natural and Forced Response topic, find the article on RLC Variations. The simulation models have giant MOSFETS acting like mechanical switches to initialize the voltage. Remove the spaces and try this URL,

https : //spinningnumbers . org/a/rlc-natural-response-variations.html#under-damped

(Scroll down to the end of the Under Damped chapter to find the simulation model.)(2 votes)

- The article begins by telling:

( α > ωo ) implies overdamped circuit. Or,

( R/2L > ωo ) implies overdamped circuit..................... (1)

But at a later point, the article also tells:

"A circuit will be overdamped if the resistance is high relative to the resonant frequency."

This means,

( R > ωo ) implies overdamped circuit..................... (2)

If ( R/2L > ωo ) and ( R > ωo ), both implies an overdamped circuit, this means both are equivalent statements.

How can ( R/2L > ωo ) means the same thing as ( R > ωo )?(1 vote)- Equation (1) is correct.

For equation (2) you are taking a very qualitative statement and trying to turn it into an equation, but this doesn't work. The units are all wrong... ohms > radians/sec. I'm just trying to say you end up with an over damped circuit if the resistance is high. In technical terms, a circuit is over damped when equation (1) is true.(2 votes)

- In the hidden section about the underdamped natural frequency approximation, it states that we can only approximate the frequency as w0 because the damping factor under the radical shifts the frequency over time (the wavelength changes).

I think this is misleading and not true. The natural frequency does not change; only the envelope changes.

lets begin with the end solution for the differential eqn:

i = <some function of t> * <a sinusoidal>. in our RLC case:

i = 5e^-t * sin2t.

We can clearly see that the argument of the sine function depends linearly on t. Nothing else. The multiplier (or Eigenvalue) acts only as an envelope function which does nothing in term of frequency.

The natural frequency is determined by the roots of the differential equation, which in turn are characterized by the "damping factor" alpha and the "frequency" omega. But these names are only naming convention after the case that the damping factor equals 0 (the only case we can state that w is the natural frequency, as it is the only factor which determines the roots). Otherwise, the frequency is a "combination" of alpha and w. And it stays constant! The name "damping factor" arise from the fact that when it is not zero, the sinusoidal decays.

The only way to change the system's FIXED natural frequency is by changing the boundary conditions.(1 vote) - I used a program to graph the overdamped current solution, and I am pretty sure it never goes up to two amperes as it is shown. The equation 1.25*(exp(-x)-exp(-9x)) has a zero derivative at (-ln(1/9))/8=0.2747 which makes the function value 0.8443, never rises above this.(1 vote)
- Suppose a parallel RLC circuit is critically damped at the natural frequency of 100 Hz. I have values for R and L. How do I calculate a value of C such that it is critically damped. I know it can be calculated using 1/2RC = 1/sqrt(LC) but how do I incorporate an element of 100 Hz from this formula? This formula doesn't give me the critical damped circuit with the natural frequency of 100 Hz. Please tell me.(1 vote)
- I don't really have a good feel for what the i-t curves would look like for these three variations of the RLC natural response. Why don't you give specific examples with their graphs?

A more general criticism of the entire EE course -- there are not nearly enough problems to try to solve to test the reader's understanding. Please provide problems for each module!!(1 vote)- The currents are fully worked out and plotted. Search in this article for "Example of over damping" and "Example of critical damping". These are hints that open up to reveal the plots.

If you follow this link to the derivation of the under damped RLC you will find a plot of the current for that variation, https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-circuit-analysis-topic/ee-natural-and-forced-response/a/w/ee/a/ee-rlc-natural-response-derivation(1 vote)