Health and medicine
Created by Ronald Sahyouni.
Want to join the conversation?
- Wouldn't it be more simple if we were cyclops?(11 votes)
- It would be simpler, but it would be a lot less useful. Having two eyes allows us to have depth perception; that's not possible with only one eye.(22 votes)
- Hello Everyone :D
It would great if someone can just explain the diff. between ''Relative Size'' and ''Size Constancy'' visual cues.
Thanks in advance,
Murtuza Abbas.(5 votes)
- Relative size is just outright comparing the sizes of two things, i.e. Thing A is bigger than Thing B.
Size constancy is the idea that our brains can perceive two things as different sizes but know that they are actually approximately the same size.(11 votes)
- Are there written notes to every video? I constantly write and type as I listen and watch, and it would save a lot of time to just watch and add my own notes later.
Thank you for your time and help in advance(6 votes)
- It takes a lot of extra effort, but I've been writing my own transcriptions of each video I see. When I was doing my degree, there was just no time to make neat, perfect notes with eloquent sentences and pretty diagrams, so I had to take jot notes. Spending the extra time on my notes has really helped me I've found. Somehow writing every word down helps me to internalize it a lot better.
You can access the transcript though in each Khan video by clicking the Youtube link on the bottom right corner, and going to the youtube video, and then pressing the "...More" button, and then going to transcript. The youtube video for this video is over here https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=481&v=PQyQadCqLAI(5 votes)
- are the constancy cues monocular cues?(4 votes)
- Yes they are, because they apply using just one eye (as opposed to binocular cues that are only evident when using both eyes).(5 votes)
- Is relative height dependent on surrounding cues?(3 votes)
- In the picture example he uses it makes it seem like it, but the relative height phenomenon is simply that we perceive objects higher in our field of view (the upper half, i.e. lower retinal cells of our eyes) as more of a background object; "up is sky and down is ground" sort of thing. We have a preconceived knowledge that going farther back the ground "tilts up." However, surrounding cues allow us to form 3D representations rather than a flat image.
Consider two squares of same size: we draw them on paper, one closer to the top edge of our oriented paper. Now if we draw a horizontal line above the "bottom edges" of both squares but below the "top edges" (the squares have to stager). We would perceive the one higher up as farther away, even when they are identical size (because they are identical, we also will think of the one we see as farther away as bigger). Turn the paper upside down and the roles of the squares reverse, the other now taking the background.(5 votes)
- Which ones of these are "form" cues, and which ones are "depth" cues?(2 votes)
- I would say that relative height and shade are "form cues" while Retinal disparity, convergence, relative size, interposition are "depth" cues. But I don't think it's exactly categorical--some of these cues provide information about two categories, for example relative height.(3 votes)
- "Monocular vision is poor at determining depth."
Is this true?
In general, which perceptual categories correspond to which cues?
- Walk in the woods sometime and close one eye. You will see that your perception of the trees locations, depths, etc are altered.(5 votes)
- If two eyes is what allows us to have depth perception, why do we still have depth perception if we close one eye? I can still orient myself fine depth-wise if I close one eye.(1 vote)
- You still have some depth perception because there are other methods our brains have learned to use to judge depth along with using two eyes. But your depth perception is not as good as when you are using both eyes.(3 votes)
- 6:13Are size, shape, and color constancy monocular cues?(2 votes)
- Is there a significant difference between size constancy and relative size?(1 vote)
Voiceover: How is perception organized? Well, whenever we look at anything, we need to make inferences. One of the things that we can do is take into account depth. Depth allows us to get an idea of how far away something is, how close something is, and just it adds to our perception of objects. In order for us to take into account depth of objects, we can use a few different tricks. The first thing that we can immediately notice is that humans have two eyes. We have binocular vision. Binocular vision basically gives us something known as retinal disparity, retinal disparity. Basically, since our eyes are about 2-1/2 inches apart and this basically allows us to get slightly different views of objects in the world around us. For example, let's imagine you're at a bowling alley. When you're looking at some pins, your left eye sees the pin, the bowling pins in this angle, and your right eye sees them in this angle, and your brain takes these two images, puts them together, and gives you this image over here. This allows us, this gives us some degree of depth of what we're looking at. That's retinal disparity. Another way that our two eyes help us take depth into account is something known as convergence. This basically is trying to say that when we're looking at things really far away, the muscles in our eyes are fairly relaxed. When we're looking at something really close to us, the muscles in our eyes turn our eyeballs towards the object. Our brain is able to look at how much the eyeballs are turned in order to give us another kind of depth cue. There are other cues that we can get that we don't need two eyes for. Those would be monocular cues, monocular cues. One monocular cue would be relative size, relative size. Relative size gives us a idea of the form of an object. Perceptual organization is organizing to depth and then form. Relative size would be ... I'm just bringing up a few examples. Relative size would be this example over here, where we got two ants, and this ant is perceived to be bigger. Since it's perceived to be bigger, we know ants are fairly the same size, so since this ant is perceived to be bigger, we perceive it as being closer to us. Even though we know these two ants in real life are the same size, but since this guy is bigger, we think of it as being closer to us. This we really only need one eye for. We can see the relative size of things and infer the proximity of the object to us with just one eye. Another monocular cue is something known as interposition. Interposition would be this example over here, where you only need one eye to see that this rectangle is in front of this oval. We can infer that since the rectangle is in front of the oval that the rectangle is closer to us. Another monocular cue is relative height, relative height. Relative height would be this example over here. Relative height is basically saying that objects that are perceived to be higher are perceived to be further away than those that are lower. This rectangle over here, this one over here, is higher up than this red rectangle over here. Because it's higher, and based on all the surrounding cues, we perceive it to be as further away. But in fact, they are the same exact shape. They're the same exact height. It's just that this one is placed physically higher than the red rectangle, and so we perceive it to be further away. That's relative height, and that's a monocular cue. One more monocular cue is shading and contour. We can actually use light and shadows in order to get an idea of the form of an object. These two images over here are actually the same exact image. It's just that this one is flipped over. We took this image, we flipped it upside down, and now we see it over here. In this image, we kind of see this little contour. It looks like a crater. Whereas over here, it looks more like a volcano-ey mountain. Based on light and the shadows of an object, you can infer whether it's a crater or if it's coming out of the earth like this. These are some monocular cues. Those are the monocular cues that we can use to get information about the form of an object. There is another degree to perceptual organization, and that is motion. Whenever we perceive an object, we have to categorize whether it's moving or not. There is one interesting monocular cue known as motion parallax, motion parallax or relative motion. What this is basically saying is that when you're in a car and you're driving around, the things that are closest to you appear like they're moving really, really quickly, whereas things further away from you appear like they're moving really slow. If you've ever driven down in a desert or something and looked off in the distance and see mountains, you're looking at mountains, the mountains look like they're moving really, really slowly, whereas things like cars right next to you or the road looks like it's moving really quickly. That is relative motion, and that's a monocular cue. You can get an idea of how far away things are based on how much they move as you move. One other perceptual category is constancy. There are a few different types of constancy. There is size constancy. Over here, we have size constancy. When we look at these two ladies over here, we can see that this lady is bigger than this one over here. This lady casts a bigger image on our retina than this one does. Yet we know that these two women are more or less fairly the same size. Even though this woman casts a bigger retinal image than this one does, we know that they're fairly the same size. That's size constancy. There is something known as shape constancy. Shape constancy would be over here. Here, we have a door, it's a rectangle, and as someone is opening the door, the shape that we actually see changes a little bit. So if we actually look at it, it's no longer a rectangle. It's more of this trapezoid. It's actually changing shape, so the image that the door casts on our retina is actually different. Yet we know that the door isn't changing shape. It's still a rectangle. It's just that it's getting opened, so our perception of the door remains the same. We know it's the same shape even though it's casting a different image on our retina. One other type of constancy is color constancy, color constancy Here, we have a red cup, and despite changes in the lighting, we know, even though over here, this red appears to be brighter than this red, this red over here, this part of the cup looks darker, even though the actual color that is falling on our retina is different, we know that the cup is actually the same color. That is color constancy.