If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Elements and atoms

Elements are pure substances with specific properties. Atoms are the smallest units of elements that still retain the element's properties. Atoms contain electrons, neutrons, and protons. Each element is defined by the number of protons in its nucleus. Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user jair.p90
    What are the 4 fundamental blocks of the life? Is Carbon one of them?
    (624 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • old spice man green style avatar for user Adrian Nakic
      The human body contains 65% oxygen, 18% carbon, 10% hydrogen, 3% nitrogen, 1.5% calcium, 1% phosphorus, 0.35% potassium, 0.25% sulfur, 0.15% sodium, 0.05% magnesium, and copper, zinc, selenium, molybdenum, fluorine, chlorine, iodine, manganese, cobalt, iron have a percentage of about 0.7%, and there are trace amounts of lithium, Strontium, aluminum, silicon, lead, vanadium, arsenic, bromine are in trace amounts.
      (1,317 votes)
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Barath
    Why is the protons so close together? Doesn't positive and positive repel.
    (403 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky ultimate style avatar for user Vedansh Goenka
    is there something smaller than a atom?
    (167 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops seedling style avatar for user Divya
      Yes, there are indeed. An atom itself is consisted of a nucleus that is 'orbited' by electrons. Inside the nucleus are the protons and the neutrons. These subatomic particles must be 'smaller,' for they are the building blocks of an atom.

      We can even have smaller. Quarks make up protons and neutrons. Gluons are the subatomic particles that 'bind' quarks and hold them together.

      Here are some other particles that are also 'smaller' than an atom:
      1) Photons (tiny particles of light. Though they are powerful packets of energy, they have no mass).
      2) Neutrinos (another tiny particle. They are similar to electrons, though they do not have an electrical charge. Neutrinos are born from violent explosions, such as exploding stars and gamma ray bursts. They are nearly massless and are capable of traveling at almost the speed of light. However, they interact quite weakly with other particles).

      Hope that helped! :o)
      (534 votes)
  • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user Nagisa
    What is an atom?
    (43 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leafers tree style avatar for user Jacob Darley
      An atom is a conglomeration of subatomic particles that were fused together under extreme heats and pressures many millions/ billions of years ago. Indeed the heavier elements were created in the supernovas of dying stars (we're all made of star dust! how special!) Anyways what conceptually separates an atom from the subatomic particles which comprise it is the fact that when these individual particle come together they assume properties that the particles would lack alone. And again, if you were to break an atom apart into its electrons, protons and neutrons, those building blocks would no-longer exhibit the behavior and properties that they exhibited as a combined mass. Much of these behaviors are due to the number of electrons (negatively charged particles). And the number of electrons is typically dictated by the number of protons, because protons have a nearly equal positive charge, in comparison to the aforementioned electrons. They attract because opposite charges of similar magnitude attract one another.
      (90 votes)
  • starky tree style avatar for user Ertiza Kazi
    Why does "lead" abbreviate to "Pb" ?
    (30 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • marcimus pink style avatar for user Diane Nave
    What is the actual process used to determine the number of protons in an element?
    (33 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Alexander Zaleski
    so, if you can change one atom into another, could you get rich changing a lead atom into a gold or silver atom and then selling it for money?
    (17 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user tamariahtopaz2003
    this might be a dumb question but why is the periodic table shaped the way it is , is it in a specific order
    (13 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf red style avatar for user Richard
      Not a stupid question at all, a very good one because some people might think the periodic table is arbitrarily shaped the way it is. There are specific reasons why it's shaped the way it is.

      Elements which occupy the same column (or group) have the similar reactivities based on how many valance electrons they have. So for example on the far right in group 18 are the noble gases which, while greatly different in size, all are common in that they are very unreactive. To the left of them in group 17 are the halogens which are still greatly different in size but are very reactive now still thanks to their valance electrons.

      The rows (or periods) tell you broadly how many electrons are in the energy levels (or shells) of elements. So elements in the first row (hydrogen and helium) can have 2 valence electrons because they only have access to the first energy level which only holds 2 electrons. Elements in the second row can have 8 valence electrons now since the second energy level can hold up to 8 electrons. And so on.

      Side note The two rows at the bottom are sometimes confused as separate rows from the rest of the periodic table, but are actually part of the 6th and 7th rows which fit in-between groups 3 and 4 (or groups 2 and 3, there is some disagreement exactly where the break is). They're often shown separate because to include them would make the periodic table rather long and difficult to print onto papers and textbooks so they condense it as such.

      Hope that helps.
      (40 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user avinashkaimal
    dear sal sir

    would the nucleus be a cluster or not a cluster
    (21 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • primosaur ultimate style avatar for user IVIatjam
    Do you think that the element with an atomic number of 43 will turn up in nature? I know scientists have created Technetium, a man-made element with an atomic number of 43, but do you think a natural element with 43 protons will turn up?
    (10 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

We humans have known, for thousands of years, just looking at our environment around us, that there are different substances. And these different substances tend to have different properties. And not only do they have different properties, one might reflect light in a certain way, or not reflect light, or be a certain color, or at a certain temperature, be liquid or gas, or be a solid. But we also start to observe how they react with each other in certain circumstances. And here's pictures of some of these substances. This right here is carbon. And this is in its graphite form. This right here is lead. This right here is gold. And all of the ones that I've shown pictures of, here-- and I got them all from this website, right over there-- all of these are in their solid form. But we also know that it looks like there's certain types of air, and certain types of air particles. And depending on what type of air particles you're looking at, whether it is carbon or oxygen or nitrogen, that seems to have different types of properties. Or there are other things that can be liquid. Or even if you raise the temperature high enough on these things. You could, if you raise the temperature high enough on gold or lead, you could get a liquid. Or if you, kind of, if you burn this carbon, you can get it to a gaseous state. You can release it into the atmosphere. You can break its structure. So these are things that we've all, kind of, that humanity has observed for thousands of years. But it leads to a natural question that used to be a philosophical question. But now we can answer it a little bit better. And that question is, if you keep breaking down this carbon, into smaller and smaller chunks, is there some smallest chunk, some smallest unit, of this stuff, of this substance, that still has the properties of carbon? And if you were to, somehow, break that even further, somehow, you would lose the properties of the carbon. And the answer is, there is. And so just to get our terminology, we call these different substances-- these pure substances that have these specific properties at certain temperatures and react in certain ways-- we call them elements. Carbon is an element. Lead is an element. Gold is an element. You might say that water is an element. And in history, people have referred to water as an element. But now we know that water is made up of more basic elements. It's made of oxygen and of hydrogen. And all of our elements are listed here in the Periodic Table of Elements. C stands for carbon-- I'm just going through the ones that are very relevant to humanity, but over time, you'll probably familiarize yourself with all of these. This is oxygen. This is nitrogen. This is silicon. Au is gold. This is lead. And that most basic unit, of any of these elements, is the atom. So if you were to keep digging in, and keep taking smaller and smaller chunks of this, eventually, you would get to a carbon atom. Do the same thing over here, eventually you would get to a gold atom. You did the same thing over here, eventually, you would get some-- this little, small, for lack of a better word, particle, that you would call a lead atom. And you wouldn't be able to break that down anymore and still call that lead, for it to still have the properties of lead. And just to give you an idea-- this is really something that I have trouble imagining-- is that atoms are unbelievably small, really unimaginably small. So for example, carbon. My hair is also made out of carbon. In fact, most of me is made out of carbon. In fact, most of all living things are made out of carbon. And so if you took my hair-- and so my hair is carbon, my hair is mostly carbon. So if you took my hair-- right over here, my hair isn't yellow, but it contrasts nicely with the black. My hair is black, but if I did that, you wouldn't be able to see it on the screen. But if you took my hair, here, and I were to ask you, how many carbon atoms wide is my hair? So, if you took a cross section of my hair, not the length, the width of my hair, and said, how many carbon atoms wide is that? And you might guess, oh, you know, Sal already told me they're very small. So maybe there's 1,000 carbon atoms there, or 10,000, or 100,000. I would say, no. There are 1 million carbon atoms, or you could string 1 million carbon atoms across the width of the average human hair. That's obviously an approximation. It's not exactly 1 million. But that gives you a sense of how small an atom is. You know, pluck a hair out of your head, and just imagine putting a million things next to each other, across the hair. Not the length of the hair, the width of the hair. It's even hard to see the width of a hair, and there would be a million carbon atoms, just going along it. Now it would be pretty cool, in and of itself, that we do know that there is this most basic building block of carbon, this most basic building block of any element. But what's even neater is that, those basic building blocks are related to each other. That a carbon atom is made up of even more fundamental particles. A gold atom is made up even more fundamental particles. And depending-- and they're actually defined by the arrangement of those fundamental particles. And if you were to change the number of fundamental particles you have, you could change the properties of the element, how it would react, or you could even change the element itself. And just to understand it a little bit better, let's talk about those fundamental elements. So you have the proton. And the proton is actually the defining-- the number of protons in the nucleus of an atom, and I'll talk about the nucleus in a second-- that is what defines the element. So this is what defines an element. When you look at the periodic table right here, they're actually written in order of atomic number. And the atomic number is, literally, just the number of protons in the element. So by definition, hydrogen has one proton, helium has two protons, carbon has six protons. You cannot have carbon with seven protons. If you did, it would be nitrogen. It would not be carbon anymore. Oxygen has eight protons. If, somehow, you were to add another proton to there, it wouldn't be oxygen anymore. It would be fluorine. So it defines the element. And the atomic number, the number of protons-- and remember, that's the number that's written right at the top, here, for each of these elements in the periodic table-- the number of protons is equal to the atomic number. And they put that number up here, because that is the defining characteristic of an element. The other two constituents of an atom-- I guess we could call it that way-- are the electron and the neutron. And the model you can start to build in your head-- and this model, as we go through chemistry, it'll get a little bit more abstract and really hard to conceptualize. But one way to think about it is, you have the protons and the neutrons that are at the center of the atom. They're the nucleus of the atom. So for example, carbon, we know, has six protons. So one, two, three, four, five, six. Carbon-12, which is a version of carbon, will also have six neutrons. You can have versions of carbon that have a different number of neutrons. So the neutrons can change, the electrons can change, you can still have the same element. The protons can't change. You change the protons, you've got a different element. So let me draw a carbon-12 nucleus, one, two, three, four, five, six. So this right here is the nucleus of carbon-12. And sometimes, it'll be written like this. And sometimes, they'll actually write the number of protons, as well. And the reason why we write it carbon-12-- you know, I counted out six neutrons-- is that, this is the total, you could view this as the total number of-- one way to view it. And we'll get a little bit nuance in the future-- is that this is the total number of protons and neutrons inside of its nucleus. And this carbon, by definition, has an atomic number of six, but we can rewrite it here, just so that we can remind ourselves. So at the center of a carbon atom, we have this nucleus. And carbon-12 will have six protons and six neutrons. Another version of carbon, carbon-14, will still have six protons, but then it would have eight neutrons. So the number of neutrons can change. But this is carbon-12, right over here. And if carbon-12 is neutral-- and I'll give a little nuance on this word in a second as well-- if it is neutral, it'll also have six electrons. So let me draw those six electrons, one, two, three, four, five, six. And one way-- and this is maybe the first-order way of thinking about the relationship between the electrons and the nucleus-- is that you can imagine the electrons are, kind of, moving around, buzzing around this nucleus. One model is, you could, kind of, thinking of them as orbiting around the nucleus. But that's not quite right. They don't orbit the way that a planet, say, orbits around the sun. But that's a good starting point. Another way is, they're kind of jumping around the nucleus, or they're buzzing around the nucleus. And that's just because reality just gets very strange at this level. And we'll actually have to go into quantum physics to really understand what the electron is doing. But a first mental model in your head is at the center of this atom, this carbon-12 atom, you have this nucleus, right over there. And these electrons are jumping around this nucleus. And the reason why these electrons don't just go off, away from this nucleus. Why they're kind of bound to this nucleus, and they form part of this atom, is that protons have a positive charge and electrons have a negative charge. And it's one of these properties of these fundamental particles. And when you start thinking about, well, what is a charge, fundamentally, other than a label? And it starts to get kind of deep. But the one thing that we know, when we talk about electromagnetic force, is that unlike charges attract each other. So the best way to think about it is, protons and electrons, because they have different charges, they attract each other. Neutrons are neutral. So they're really just sitting here inside of the nucleus. And they do affect the properties, on some level, for some atoms of certain elements. But the reason why we have the electrons not just flying off on their own is because, they are attracted towards the nucleus. And they also have an unbelievably high velocity. It's actually hard for-- and we start touching, once again, on a very strange part of physics once we start talking about what an electron actually is doing. But it has enough, I guess you could say, it's jumping around enough that it doesn't want to just fall into the nucleus, I guess is one way of thinking about it. And so I mentioned, carbon-12 right over here, defined by the number of protons. Oxygen would be defined by having eight protons. But once again, electrons can interact with other electrons. Or they can be taken away by other atoms. And that actually forms a lot of our understanding of chemistry. It's based on how many electrons an atom has, or a certain element has. And how those electrons are configured. And how the electrons of other elements are configured. Or maybe, other atoms of that same element. We can start to predict how an atom of one element could react with another atom of that same element. Or an atom of one element, how it could react, or how it could bond, or not bond, or be attracted, or repel, another atom of another element. So for example-- and we'll learn a lot more about this in the future-- it is possible for another atom, someplace, to swipe away an electron from a carbon, just because, for whatever reason. And we'll talk about certain elements, certain neutral atoms of certain elements, have a larger affinity for electrons than others. So maybe one of those swipes an electron away from a carbon, and then this carbon will be having less electrons than protons. So then it would have five electrons and six protons. And then it would have a net positive charge. So, in this carbon-12, the first version I did, I had six protons, six electrons. The charges canceled out. If I lose an electron, then I only have five of these. And then I would have a net positive charge. And we're going to talk a lot more about all of this throughout the chemistry playlist. But hopefully, you have an appreciation that this is already starting to get really cool. Once we can already get to this really, fundamental building block, called the atom. And what's even neater is that this fundamental building block is built of even more fundamental building blocks. And these things can all be swapped around, to change the properties of an atom, or to even go from an atom of one element to an atom of another element.