If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Silicon-based life

Could silicon play a role similar to carbon's in supporting life?

Want to join the conversation?

  • leafers ultimate style avatar for user Colin
    If life could be based Theoretically on silicon couldn't it also be Theoretically based on Germanium, Tin, Lead, or Flerovium?
    (60 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • orange juice squid orange style avatar for user Toxicz
      It could yes. However, those elements are all much heavier and bigger than Carbon. The light weight and small dimension of carbon gives enzymes the ability to manipulate the bonds in carbon based molecules. Furthermore, the bigger the atoms, the further away the valence electrons from the nucleus, and the less electronegative the atom. This means weaker bonds between atoms of the same kind (for example; Fl - Fl), so less stable formation of Fl - Fl structures which are often needed for life (think about long carbon chains in organic molecules). Furthermore, less electronegative atoms have stronger bonds with highly electronegative atoms, like O2. This means that as an organism bonds between FlO2 (for example) will be difficult to take apart, and wont be favorable to gain energy from.

      So lets just say that it could be but those elements wont be the most efficient ones to base life on.
      (100 votes)
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Jason Starlight
    At Sal says that silicon-silicon bonds are not as strong as carbon's. Why is that? Is it something to do with silicon's structure and hybridization?
    (21 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf blue style avatar for user kind of blue
    why is silicon is so important for the computer technology rather than carbon?
    (13 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops seed style avatar for user azam.m.awais
      silicon unlike carbon is a semicondutor. It can be used to give very small volatge signals as it resistance decreases with temperature. Carbon on the other hand is a insulator except as graphite, which only acts as conductor in one direction.
      (19 votes)
  • primosaur ultimate style avatar for user FLAMELORD117
    Every time we breath out we're exhaling carbon dioxide, right? So are we breathing out our own store of carbon, or are we breathing out the carbon that's already in the air?
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user I am who I am
    what makes silicon's bonds so much stronger
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • starky seed style avatar for user Dishita
      silicon's bond with each other is much weaker than those of carbon(as si has lower electronegativity- tendency to gain electrons-than C)

      But, bonds between more electronegative atoms(like Oxygen) with atoms with low electronegativity is very strong that is why bond between Si and O in SiO2 is much stronger than C and O in CO2

      Hope this helps,
      If I'm wrong let me know.
      (8 votes)
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user ScienceLover7
    Does silicon have any importance in our lives?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • sneak peak blue style avatar for user tharunathome
    carbon has 4 electrons in the outermost shell and silicon also has 4 electrons in the outermost shell.Then why are they different in bonding?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • primosaur sapling style avatar for user Kiera Potineni
    How would it be different if life was based on an element which has 3 or 5 valence electrons?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user ARPIT RAJ
      If life was based on an element which has 3 or 5 valence electron the variety in our life get reduced because carbon can form 4 single covalent bond where as nitrogen ( valence electron-5) can form only 3 single covalent bond .Carbon can form much more compound than any other element due to its small size and presence of 4 valence electron .
      (3 votes)
  • marcimus orange style avatar for user Mango
    Why is it that elements which form 4 covalent bonds are so important? Wouldn't elements that can form more than 4 be even better as they can bond with even more elements(for example, boron or beryllium)?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf grey style avatar for user kaede
      it is important because, it can share electrons with almost any type of element. if it is more than 4, they form ionic compounds or simple compounds because they can easily gain 3 or less electrons and if it is less than 4, it can easily lose 3, then gain 5 !
      (5 votes)
  • starky sapling style avatar for user Hi
    At Sal mentioned that the outer most electrons are more likely to react. Does that mean electrons in the inner shells react with other atoms?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • spunky sam blue style avatar for user Khanstudy1234
      Hey, any kind of reaction happening will only occur with the outer shell electrons and not in the inner shells. The reasons for this you will get to know in higher classes.
      Take a daily-life example , when you fry a bunch of french fries, you will observe that although the whole fries cook, the outer part is crispy whereas the inner part still is soft.
      (2 votes)

Video transcript

We've already spent a lot of time thinking about how awesome carbon is for life, that really life as we know is carbon based. And this all comes out of carbon's ability to bond with other carbons and form all sorts of neat structures, bonds with oxygen, hydrogens, and other things. In fact, we have a whole class of molecules called organic molecules that just are molecules that involve carbon and carbons bonding capabilities really come out of its electron structure. We talked about this in the previous video but if we think about carbon, it has six protons and a neutral carbon will have six electrons. Two of them are sitting at its innermost shell and then the other four are on its outermost shell, and those four are the ones that tend to react and we call them the valence electrons. And so these valence electrons tend to form four covalent bonds, for example if you wanted a bond with four hydrogens, well each hydrogen would contribute each hydrogen would contribute an electron to one of these pairs, which are essentially going to be a covalent bond and then the hydrogens, can feel that their outer shell is complete because hydrogen is just trying to get to two to fill its outer shell to try to be a little bit more like helium and carbon is trying to get to eight in its outer shell to be a little bit more like neon. Neon has two in its inner shell and eight in its outer shell. You might remember the octet rule that, that atoms try to get to eight or pretend like they have eight electrons in the outer shell to feel stable. And here carbon is sharing eight electrons. It contributed four and the four hydgrogens contributed four and it forms, it forms methane. Now those of you who are quite astute might have said: okay you know what, I know of other elements that tend to form four covalent bonds, that have four valence electrons. And in particular there's one that's awfully close to carbon on the periodic table and that's right over here. This is, this is silicon. Silicon has 14 protons and a neutral silicon would have 14 electrons. So let me draw that. So, if we have silicon right over here. I'm just gonna focus on the electrons. You would have two electron sitting in its innermost, in its innermost shell, so they are jumping here They're not these neat, well-defined orbits. They are just jumping around in that, in that lowest energy in that, in that, in the innermost shell. Then you have another eight in its second shell. So, one... I'll just draw them three, four, five, six, seven, eight, all jumping around all jumping around in the second shell. And it has a total of fourteen, so we already used up ten so it is going to have four in its outermost shell. So, one, two, three, four and these four in its outermost shell, these are the ones that tend to do the reacting. We call them valence electrons. So if we want to just draw the valence electrons, we could do silicon has four valence electrons, four has four. One, two, three, four valence electrons, just like carbon. It has a different number of electrons. These four valence electrons are actually one shell further out but it has four that tend to react. And it does tend to form four covalent bonds. So, you might be saying, well, can't we have life that is dependent, that a silicon-based as opposed to carbon-based and if you thought that, you would not be the first person to think about that. Science fiction or authors have have have theorized that, and this right actually This is a, this is a screenshot from "The Devil In The Dark " episode 1967, from the original Star Trek, where they said maybe they encounter, Kirk encounters that, the enterprise encounters these creatures that are silicon-based. They are called Hortas and they have all sorts of interesting properties. So, there's you know, there's some folks who like to think maybe maybe silicon. But when you actually look at the chemistry, things start to break down a little bit. For example, one of the neat things about carbon is it readily forms bonds with other carbons and that these bonds can actually be quite long. You can form all sorts of these hydrocarbons and all sorts of other carbon-carbon structures, long chains of carbon. So you can do that with carbon but it turns out that silicon-silicon bonds are not that strong and silicon is not going to form, is not going to form really long chains. So silicon is not going to do that. Even if you look at a simple, a simple molecule like methane there is, there is a molecule called silane but this does not readily form, it doesn't have the same characteristics. So this is also not going to be as good as methane and even if you think about something like carbon dioxide which is carbon which is carbon bonded, having two double bonds so this is carbon having two double bonds to oxygens so two, so one double bond to one oxygen, another double bond to another oxygen And we're used to thinking about carbon dioxide in our everyday life as a gas. Plants are using these to fix into their structure, to actually grow, they are taking the carbon out of it in their carbon fixation. We are, we exhale this carbon dioxide, it's essential to life and you might think well what about, what about silicon oxide. And silicon dioxide, is actually a fairly common molecule, fairly common compound but it does not exist at a gaseous state at the temperatures that we are normally, that we normally associate with life. Most of silicon oxide is in the form of quartz in the ground. So that is quartz over there. So when you look at the actual ways that silicon forms bonds it actually does not seem actually close to as good as carbon. Something like silicon when silicon bonds with oxygen it's a much -- not only is it in the solid form at normal temperatures where we normally associate life but these are very, very, very strong bonds, much stronger than the bonds that carbon is forming with oxygen. They're so strong, they make it hard for them to be manipulated with the types of chemical reactions that we're used to seeing inside of organisms. So, you know, it's fun to theorize about this and I'd be the last person to rule anything out. I think the universe will continue to surprise us with things that right now we cannot even imagine. But based on the chemistry we know and based on life as we know it even though silicon can form these four covalent bonds and does have four valence electrons, it's still nowhere near as good as carbon in doing the types of processes that we think are necessary for life.