If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content


Explore the relationship between voltage and charge in capacitors. This tutorial illuminates the concept of capacitance, demonstrating how it's directly proportional to voltage. Learn how to calculate voltage differences, understand the electric field's role, and grasp the significance of the permittivity of free space. . Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

  • leaf green style avatar for user Amandeep Singh
    Why do we need a capacitor?
    (155 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user Jason Lopez
      Or, in the case of musical equipment, they store charge that the circuit requires to operate other components. Once the ON switch is hit, they release the charge stored to fire up parts of the circuit. Like a quick burst of power (i.e. camera flash). Also, they're used in Equalizers, crossovers and tone control as they're important to create filters. Especially important in vacuum tube amplifiers.
      (137 votes)
  • leaf green style avatar for user Martin
    Why do the field lines at bulge out when they get to the edges?
    (31 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot hal style avatar for user yogesh kumar
      just imagine that there were a positive charge kept near the edge of the positively charged plate then the charge would be pushed outward because the horizontal components due to the charges on the left are not cancelled.but when is more near to the negatively charged plate there would be a net attractive force on it and it would curve inwards hence giving the field lines that kind of shape.
      the field lines at the edges of a capacitor plate have the same shape as of the field lines due to an electric dipole.you might want to see earlier videos to get that
      (30 votes)
  • spunky sam blue style avatar for user sidra Rashid
    Whats the difference between a capacitor and a battery?
    (13 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user Mark Zwald
      Batteries use an ongoing chemical reaction to generate a potential difference between two terminals. Capacitors can store charge like a battery, but have no internal chemistry to maintain a potential; however they can discharge very rapidly whereas batteries have a limit on how much current they can output. Once the charge in a capacitor has been used up, it cannot be replenished until the capacitor is charged by an external current. Capacitors have high power density, but low energy density. Batteries have low power density, but high energy density.

      If someone can invent a device which has both high power and energy density, they will be very rich.
      (47 votes)
  • leaf green style avatar for user prasanth.E
    why a capacitor does not allows dc current and why it allows ac
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot hal style avatar for user captdane3
      You can imagine a capacitor like a "balloon", and the DC as a man blowing on the balloon.
      The balloon at the start allows the man to keep blowing into it but at some point the balloon can no longer stretch and no more flow of air can get in.

      For AC you can imagine it as man who inhales and exhales in the balloon (Don't try this at home XD) The balloon expands as the man exhales and contracts while the man inhales the air he blew in. You can see that air is constantly flowing in and out of the balloon.

      The analogy is an oversimplification but it gives you a rough idea of how a capacitor works for electricity in AC and DC. DC stands for Direct Current and so the electric current only flows in directly in one direction (man constantly blowing), while AC stands for Alternating Current where it alternates electricity from one direction to the opposite direction back and forth (man inhaling and exhaling). The flow of the air in my analogy is the flow of electricity and so there's an initial flow during DC when the capacitor is empty/discharged but soon doesn't allow a flow when its fully charged whereas the capacitor constantly charges and discharges during AC allowing a constant flow of electricity.
      (57 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user marc
    At he goes from work= charge*Electric Field*distance to work=Electric Field*change in joules. How did he arrive at the second definition? Would that not give you (N/C)*J, which is not the units that work is in.
    (8 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user swmeyer16
      Since the charge is 1 in his example, he drops the "charge" from the work equation. It then becomes E*d, with units J. While it is easy to confuse d as distance, when placed next to the unit J, with the notation for an infintesimal part of the unit, this is not what was intended in the circumstance here! In other words, it is d=distance, not dJ="change in Joules."
      (9 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Taimoor Bajwa
    why we always talk about INFINITE charged plates?why infinite??
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers ultimate style avatar for user Pranav Khote
    How to know when is the Capacitor fully charged? Is there a Formula?
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot hal style avatar for user Andrew M
      A theoretical capacitor is never fully charged! It just keeps following an asymptote closer and closer to maximum charge. Graph the formula provided by Marco and you will see that Vc never stops getting closer and closer to V.

      Real capacitors of course eventually stop accepting any measurable amount of current.
      (5 votes)
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Omkar Rajwade
    Does current flow or not when capacitors are connected in a circuit?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user Mark Zwald
      Raghav's answer is partially right.
      DC current can flow through a capacitor when it is not fully charged. While he is correct that no current flows across the capacitor gap, a current will still flow through the circuit because as electrons accumulate on one side of the plate, they will repel the electrons on the other side of the plate through electrostatic repulsion causing a DC current to flow. Once the capacitor is fully charged, then no more electrons can accumulate and the DC current will be zero.
      (7 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user simonjconrad
    In , where did he get Joules from? It was 1C(E)d =E(d)J ? I that later he divides that J/1C = V, but where did the J come from?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot hal style avatar for user Andrew M
      Work has to be in Joules, right? Work is force*distance, and force is qE and distance is d, so the units of qE*d must somehow be joules. Sal knows that he used SI units all along, so he already knows that the formula for work is going to give him Joules, so he writes Joules.

      To see that indeed it does come out to be joules, note that the units of E can be expressed EITHER as N/C, or V/m (those are the same thing). If we take E in V/m, then you have (just using units )
      work = C*(V/m)*m, which simplifies to C*V, and a volt is a joule per coulomb, so you end up with joules.

      If you want to use the other route , you have C*N/C*m, which is n*m, which is, again, a joule.
      (5 votes)
  • leaf yellow style avatar for user RHEA
    when do we get a uniform electric field and wen do we get a varying electric field???
    what are the sources and how will we come to know??
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot donald style avatar for user Arvind Vishak
      There are certain ways by which you come to know that you've got a uniform electric field. Coming by the "lines of force approach", a uniform electric field will be obtained by the help of equidistantly placed,parallel straight lines. (Think of it, you know that the tangent to the lines of force,give you the direction,a straight line would be the best option). Or think of closely packed and distantly spaced field lines in a field. In the former, the electric field is obviously stronger,whereas in the latter,the electric field is weaker,thereby making the field non-uniform.
      (2 votes)

Video transcript

We learned several videos ago that if I had an infinite uniformly charged plane-- let me draw one right here, and I won't draw it infinite and I'll tell you why in a second-- that if we had an infinite uniformly charged plane, and let's say this one's positive, that the electric field generated by it is constant. Those are the field lines. They should all be the same size. And the strength of the field, or the magnitude of the field, is equal to 2 times Coulomb's constant times pi times the charge density of the plate. So if this is infinite-- so what was charge density? We defined it when we proved that this truly is a uniform electric field, but what is charge density? Charge density is just the total amount of charge divided by the area, or charge per area. Well, if we have an infinite plane, the area's going to be infinite, and so if this is a constant number, this is also going to be infinite, so it's kind of hard to work with. But what we also know is that when we have a non-infinite plane that has some finite area, that near the center of it and fairly close to it, it approximates an infinite uniformly charged plane. So with that said, let's see if we can figure out some of the properties of the voltage and how the voltage relates to the charge. If we were to have two parallel-- let me draw it before I say it, because I think saying it'll just confuse it. So let's say I have two plates, that plate-- and then I'll do this one in a different color-- and I have that plate, and let's say they're the same size and they both have area A. Let's say that I place plus Q worth of charges here. So this is plus Q so this is positively charged, right? I could draw a bunch of charges here. Let's say this is minus Q, so this is negatively charged. So what's the electric field going to look like between these two? Well, it's essentially going to be the combination of the electric field generated by this plate on top of the electric field generated by this plate. And they're both going to be constant close to the center, assuming that they're reasonably-- and let's say that they're d apart. Assuming that d isn't too big, near the center we're going to have a constant electric field. For example, this green one is going to be generating-- its field lines are going to look something like this. Near the center, it's constant. These are meant to look constant. Near the center, it'll look like that, and it'll start to bulge out when you get to the edges. Once again, near the center, it's constant. That one should've been at an angle. They start to bulge out, and it'll look something like that. And similarly, this purple plate will generate a constant electric field, and since it's negatively charged, the field lines will be going towards it, not away from it, so its field lines are going to look something like this. Near the center, they'll be constant, and its field lines are going to look something like that. As you can see, they're going to be of the same magnitude and in the same direction, and they also will bulge out there. So the big picture is that you just kind of have twice the electric field as you would have if you just had one of these plates. So let's say we're operating near the center of these, where we have roughly a constant electric field and see if we can figure out the relationship between the voltage across these two plates and the area, and maybe the distance between the two plates. So we know that the electric field generated by any one of these charge plates-- I'll do it in the blue of this color. So for the bottom plate right here, what is the electric field generated? It's 2K pi times sigma. Sigma is just the total charge divided by the area. So Q/A, right? And we know that the total electric field generated by this one is going to be essentially the same thing. I mean, we could say it's a minus, a negative, because it's going towards it, but it's essentially the same thing. Because we see that they overlap just drawing the field line, so the electric field from that one, and we know that they go in the same direction. If this was somehow-- well, this is negative, so the field lines go towards it. So plus 2K pi and this is Q/A. We could have said minus and then had a minus Q/A, but we know that they go into same direction, so we know that they're going to be additive. And so we know that the total electric field is going to be 4K pi Q/A. So now we know the exact strength of the electric field. Let's see if we can figure out the voltage difference between this point and this point. What was voltage difference, just as a review? Well, voltage difference is the electrical potential energy per charge if the charge was here versus here. So how much more potential energy per coulomb is there for a charge to be here relative to here? So another way to view it is a charge here, a positive charge here, because by default we're always assuming a positive charge when we talk about positive numbers and the direction of the field lines or what the positive charge would do. So by default, a positive charge here really wants to go up to this negative plate, although we later learned that most of the movement in electronics and electricity, it's actually the negative charge that's moving. It's the electrons moving. But let's say we did have a positive ion or a positive charge. The voltage is a measure of if any charge is here, how badly does it want to move to this point if it has a way to move? If we have air here or if we have a vacuum here, it might be difficult or impossible for it to move up here. But maybe if we were to connect a wire where the charges could freely conduct, then it will move. And the voltage is just kind of how badly does it want to move? You could almost view it as electrical pressure. And maybe I'll do a whole video on trying to get an intuitive understanding of voltage, because that really is probably the most important thing to get an intuitive understanding of, if you ever want to study electrical engineering or whatever. But anyway, back to the problem. We know that the combined electric field is this, right? It goes upwards in that direction. So what is the electric potential at this point relative to this point or the potential difference from here to here? Well, that's the amount of energy per charge it would take to move a positive charge from here to there, right? Remember, electric potential energy is the amount of work necessary to move a charge from there to there, and then the voltage is how much to do it per charge. Let me write that down. So the work necessary to move a charge from there to there-- let's say a 1-coulomb charge, it will be 1 coulomb times the electric field, because we're always going to have to be going against the electric field. So we have to apply an equal and opposite force. So the force that is going to be the electric field-- so far, this just generates this force. coulomb times electric field, charge times electric field, tells us the force on the charge, right? That's force, and then we have to multiply that times distance. Force times distance. So we see the work necessary is going to be the electric field times d joules-- the J is joules-- and so what is the voltage difference or the electric potential difference between this point and this point? Let's call that point a. Let's call that point b. So Va minus Vb, which is the voltage difference, that's essentially the electric potential energy difference divided by the charge. Or, per charge. Well, here, the charge was just 1, so we can just divide by 1, and we see that it is equal to the electric field times the distance. And the units are going to be joules because we divided both sides by charge joules per coulomb, or volts, right? That's just the units. So what does that equal? So the voltage difference-- so we can say change in voltage. The voltage difference is equal to the electric field, which we know is constant 4K pi Q over A times distance. Or we could rewrite this. Let's see if we could write Q as a function of V. So if we just do a little bit of algebraic manipulation, we can get Q is equal to what? We would essentially divide both sides by 4 pi Kd and multiply both sides by A, so we would get A over 4K pi d voltage. And why is this interesting? Why did I go through all of this work to get this relationship? Well, what it shows you, if you look at this, if we assume that the area of the plates aren't changing-- that's a constant; this is definitely a constant-- and if we assume that the distance between the plates don't change, what we see is that there's a proportional difference between the voltage and the amount of the combined charge in the plates. And that's interesting because, before doing this, maybe voltage is somehow proportional to the square of the charges or to the square root, but now we know that it's directly proportionally. And actually, this term right here has a name, and it is called capacitance. And so another way of rewriting this, if we divide both sides by voltage, we get Q/V is equal to 1 over 4K pi area over distance. And so what it essentially says is that the amount of energy that-- well, actually, I don't want to go into that yet. But for a given configuration, and the configuration is defined by the area of the plates and the distance-- for a given configuration, if I know the amount of charge that I put onto the plates, if I did a minus Q here and a plus Q here, I know the voltage across the plates or vice versa. If I know the voltage across the plates and I know its configuration, I know how much charge there is, and this is called capacitance, and the unit for capacitance is called the Farad. And if you become an electrical engineer or even take a couple of electrical engineering courses, you'll become very familiar with this. And one other thing to point out; this term right here, just so you know a little bit of terminology. This term right here. This 1 over 4K pi, this is often called epsilon nought, or just epsilon, and that's called the permittivity of free space or permittivity of the vacuum. And maybe in a future lecture or a future video, I'll talk more about why it's called that. But anyway, I'm already well over the time limit. So I just wanted to give you a sense of, one, that you can calculate the voltage across what we call, in this case, a capacitor. It has capacitance. That voltage, you can kind of view it as the electric pressure. How bad does the charge here want to move here? And if you put a wire here, you'll learn in a second-- not in a second, in several videos-- that that charge will flow. Or actually the negative charges will flow this way and generate current. And we'll do that when we start learning a little bit more about electricity. For any given configuration, it has a corresponding capacitance, and then given that capacitance, if I put some amount of charge, I can figure out the voltage, or if I know there's some voltage, I can figure out the charge. Anyway, I will see you in the next video.