Main content
Organic chemistry
Course: Organic chemistry > Unit 5
Lesson 6: E1 and E2 reactions- E1 mechanism: kinetics and substrate
- E1 elimination: regioselectivity
- E1 mechanism: stereoselectivity
- E1 mechanism: carbocations and rearrangements
- E2 mechanism: kinetics and substrate
- E2 mechanism: regioselectivity
- E2 elimination: Stereoselectivity
- E2 elimination: Stereospecificity
- E2 elimination: Substituted cyclohexanes
- Regioselectivity, stereoselectivity, and stereospecificity
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
E2 elimination: Stereospecificity
Stereospecificity of E2 elimination reactions. Created by Jay.
Want to join the conversation?
- What is the difference between E and Z stereoisomers? And what do they stand for? What is wrong with using the cis and trans naming method? So confused!(8 votes)
- E (entgegen, German for opposite) is trans.
Z (zussamen, German for together) is cis.
The old cis/trans method of naming is limited to long hydrocarbons that contain a single double bond. There's only one chain, so it's easy to identify based on the skeleton structure whether it is cis or trans.
But when you get three or four substituents coming off of the carbons, the naming becomes less clear. Then the E/Z notation (using the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog rules for prioritization) takes over.
For example, would this molecule be cis or trans:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:(Z)-1-bromo-1,2-dicholroethene.svg(22 votes)
- I've noticed that you always use complete arrows, but shouldn't we use half arrows to indicate movement of one electron and the complete arrow for the movement of electron pairs?(3 votes)
- If we are moving electron pairs we use a complete arrow, if we are moving an electron, then we would use a half arrow (these are often called "fishhook arrows"). However, there is no instance in this video where we would use a half arrow. Fishhooks arrows are used most often in reactions involving radicals.(21 votes)
- Isn't there stereospecificity and stereoselectivity in E2 mechanisms? Could you ever get three products? I am not sure I am clear on the difference.(3 votes)
- Ignoring the mechanism for a second...
Since we are ending up with a double bond, only two products are possible: either the E alkene or the Z alkene. If this reaction was stereoselective, that would mean that there are two mechanistic paths that this reaction could proceed through: one to give the E alkene, and one to give the Z alkene. The selective part tells us that one of these mechanistic paths is favoured over the other (i.e. lower energy path), so either the E or Z alkene would be formed selectively, but some of the other isomer would also be formed via the alternate mechanism (the ratio of E:Z products would depend on how selective the reaction was).
In a stereospecific reaction, only one stereoisomer can be formed. That is, either the E or the Z product will be formed exclusively. This happens when only one mechanistic pathway is possible. The other stereoisomer can't form, because there is no mechanistic path leading to its formation.
Now coming back to the reaction shown in this video using the E2 mechanism. For the elimination to take place, the H (that's going to be deprotonated) and the Br (that's going to be leaving) need to be anti-periplanar (i.e. one pointing up, and the other pointing down) to get the necessary bonding/anti-bonding orbital overlap. In this case, when we get such overlap and the elimination occurs, we get the E alkene. This is an example of a stereospecific reaction because, mechanistically, there is no way to access the Z alkene via the E2 mechanism, because it wouldn't involve the necessary anti-periplanar geometry.
So in summary:
Stereoselective reactions have two possible mechanistic paths, both of which proceed, but one is favoured over the other. The result is that you get 2 stereoisomers, but more of one than the other.
Stereospecific reactions have only one possible mechanistic path. The result is that you get only 1 stereoisomer.(18 votes)
- At the beginning of the video, when we were assigning alpha and beta carbons.. I get the alpha carbon is the one with the Br, and the beta carbon is next too it (to the left) but why isn't the carbon to the right of the alpha C used? s it because it doesn't have any available Hs?(2 votes)
- Is this stereo specific because there is only one beta carbon?
2. If there was more than one beta carbon then it would be stereo selective?(2 votes)- The stereochemistry is the way it is because there is only one hydrogen on the carbon next to the alpha carbon.(2 votes)
- can we think of change of view point as just rotation ?(2 votes)
- Yes, you are just rotating the molecule to look at it from a different angle.(2 votes)
- Onwhy or how do you know which atoms are suppose to be on the top or bottom of the Newman projections? 3:09(2 votes)
- It really doesn't matter where they go, but chemists often find it more convenient to put the biggest group on each carbon atom on the vertical bonds.(2 votes)
- Would this molecule be named (E)-1-methyl-1,2-diphenylethene?(1 vote)
- You have to pick the longest alkene chain. It is actually
(E)-1,2-diphenylpropene.(3 votes)
- but in the previous video you named the compounds as Cis or Trans but in this video you have named it E what can't we consider the last compound ata trans compound? 7:58(2 votes)
- E is the same as trans (highest priority groups on opposite sides) and Z is the same as cis meaning the highest priority group are on the same side(1 vote)
- How can we know which one is highest priority group? Please show me! Tks(2 votes)
Video transcript
- [Narrator] The E2 reaction
is a stereospecific reaction, which means that the
stereochemistry of the substrate determines the
stereochemistry of the product because of the mechanism. And for time reasons, I have to assume that you're already familiar
with the E2 mechanism and that you understand Newman projections and Sawhorse projections. So the carbon that's bonded to the bromine would be our alpha carbon. The carbon bonded to the
alpha carbon would be our beta carbon. And we know in an E2 mechanism, we're going to take this
beta proton, our strong base, is gonna take that beta proton. So let's look down that
beta-alpha bond here. So we're gonna stare down this bond so we can see a Newman projection. So if you put your eye right here and you look down this
bond, you're gonna see a methyl group that's
going up and to the right. So down here is our Newman projection, here's our methyl group. The hydrogen would be
going up and to the left. So here's our hydrogen in white. Our phenyl group, which
remember, just a benzine ring, so this is going to be going
down on our Newman projection. And we think about the back
carbon, the alpha carbon, we have a bromine which
would be going down and to the right. We know there's also a hydrogen
bonded to this alpha carbon that'd be going down and to the left. And then we have another phenyl group which would be going straight
up in this Newman projection. So here is the phenyl group. We know that the E2
mechanism needs to have an antiperiplanar hydrogen and bromine, so if we look at this Newman projection, we already have that. This hydrogen in white
is already antiperiplanar with this bromine, so we
already have what we need for the E2 mechanism to occur. On the right here, this is really the same Newman projection. I just turned the whole thing a little bit to the right, so that line that I just drew in magenta would be this line. And so that would be
the hydrogen in white. And that would mean the methyl group would be this one right here in yellow. And the phenyl group would be going down and to the left. So talking about the front carbon. For the back carbon, the
bromine would be going down now. The phenyl group would be
going up and to the right and the hydrogen would
be the one in yellow. So again, this is the
same Newman projection, just turned a little bit
so it's a little bit easier to see our antiperiplanar
proton and our bromine. You could draw the product at this point from this Newman projection. You think about a strong base coming along and taking your beta proton. These electrons would move
in to form your double bond. At the same time, these electrons come off onto the bromine to
form the bromide anion. So let's go ahead and draw
the product for this reaction. So from the Newman projection,
you need to think about this phenyl group and this methyl group being on the same side of
the double bond that formed. So let me draw in our double bond here. So we would have our phenyl
group and our methyl group on the same side of the double bond. On the other side of the double bond, we would form, we would have I should say, this hydrogen and this phenyl group. So let's draw those in. So on this back carbon here,
that would be the hydrogen, and on the front carbon, I
would have my phenyl group. So that is the product of this reaction. Might be a little bit hard to see from this Newman projection, so here' a Sawhorse
projection, another viewpoint which might be easier to see. So let's highlight everything again. So this would be our alpha carbon and this would be our beta carbon. So our strong base is
gonna take this beta proton and these electrons would move into here to form our double bond, and these electrons come
off onto the bromine. So again, the phenyl group and the methyl group would end up on the same
side, so here they are. And on the other side, you would have this phenyl group and this hydrogen. So this phenyl group and this hydrogen. So the two phenyl groups
are on opposite sides of the double bond, and
this would be the E alkine. Let's look at this on a
video, and I think it might be really helpful to look at the model forming the alkene. Let's look at our alkyl halide. We can see that the purple
groups are the phenyl groups, the red is the bromine and at this carbon, we have a methyl group
coming out at us in space and a hydrogen going
away from us in space. We're gonna stare down
this beta-alpha bond and notice that I'm using
the stretchy bonds again so we can better visualize
the E2 mechanism. So let's stare down that bond and look at the Newman projection. So here in this Newman projection, we already have our beta
hydrogen antiperiplanar with our bromine, so if
I rotate it a little bit, there's our Newman projection. I'm also gonna turn to
the side a little bit so we can see it from
a Sawhorse projection. And our strong base, we
think about our strong base coming along and taking this proton. So pretend like the proton goes away, pretend like the bromine goes away, and you can see the
double bond that formed. And notice how the two phenyl groups are on opposite sides of the double bond, so that's our product. Let's do another E2 reaction,
and notice how similar this is to the last one. The only difference is the
stereochemistry at this carbon. Now the hydrogen is
coming out at us in space and the methyl group is
going away from us in space. So we'll see how changing
the stereochemistry affects the stereochemistry
of the product. So we need to stare down our bond again, so this would be our alpha carbon, this would be our beta carbon. We're gonna stare down
this way just like we did in the previous example. So let's think about the Newman projection that we would have. Now, our hydrogen, I'll
highlight in white here, would be going up and to the
right on our Newman projection. Our methyl group would be
going up and to the left, and our phenyl group would be going down. So here's the phenyl group. So that's our front carbon. Our back carbon would have our bromine going down and to the right. The hydrogen on the alpha
carbon would be going down and to the left. And then we have our phenyl
group going straight up, so there's our Newman projection. Notice that this time, our
beta hydrogen, so right here, this is not antiperiplanar
with our bromine. So we're going to need to
rotate about our single bond and we'll do that in a minute. First let's just get to this
Newman projection on the right. So I'm just gonna draw a line going through this methyl
group and this bromine just to help us visualize the fact that here is that same methyl group and then here is that bromine. So it's again, this is the
same Newman projection, it's just rotated a
little bit to the right. So let me highlight everything. So this would be the hydrogen in white, and we have our phenyl group over here, and then on our back carbon, we would have our hydrogen in yellow, and then we have our phenyl group, so our phenyl groups are
still anti to each other. So let's go to the video now so we can rotate about our single bond so we can get into a confirmation
that has our beta proton antiperiplanar to our bromine. Let's think about the
stereochemistry at this carbon. Now the hydrogen's coming out at us and the methyl group
is going away from us. So if we stare down
this carbon-carbon bond, we will see our Newman projection. And notice how our beta
hydrogen is not antiperiplanar with our bromine. So I'm gonna rotate the
whole thing a little bit and then I'm gonna rotate
about the single bond so we can get in the proper confirmation. So now our beta proton is antiperiplanar with our bromine. And notice how the two
phenyl groups are now gauche to each other. So if I turn a little bit to see things from a Sawhorse projection, we think about taking
away this beta proton, so the beta proton goes away, and pretend like the
bromine goes away as well. And we can see that for our product, our two phenyl groups
end up on the same side of the double bond. Hopefully the video made it clear how to figure out the products. But if you don't have
a model set on a test, you have to use your own drawings. So this line in magenta
that I drew right here, I forgot to draw it in on
this Newman projection, so that's this line. And then when you realize that your proton is not antiperiplanar,
you'll have to rotate. You'll have to rotate yourself. And I like to think about
rotating the front carbon here. I can take this hydrogen and
I'm gonna move it up to here, which would move this methyl
group over to this position and it moves the phenyl
group over to this position. So the hydrogen in white
ends up being vertical. The methyl group ends up
going down and to the left and the phenyl group ends
up going to the right. So you don't necessarily
need a model set to do this. And now we have our
hydrogen antiperiplanar with our bromine, so from this Newman projection,
you could draw the product. A base takes our beta proton,
these electrons move in here and these electrons come
off onto our bromine. And so our two phenyl groups would be on the same side of the double bond. Notice how they are gauche to each other in this Newman projection. So if I draw in my double
bond, on the back carbon I have a phenyl group. On the front carbon here,
I have a phenyl group. And then the groups in the other side of the double bond, I have a hydrogen on the back carbon and a methyl group on the front. So let me draw those in up here. So I have a methyl group
on the front carbon and a hydrogen on the back. If you prefer the Sawhorse
projection point of view, the base would take our beta proton. These electrons move in
to form our double bond, these electrons come off onto the bromine, and we have our two phenyl
groups on the same side. And so here they are,
they're on the same side. And then we would have our methyl group and our hydrogen on the same
side of our double bond. Notice this is the Z alkene, so different stereochemistry
for our product as compared to the first reaction. And actually, this reaction
would be much slower than the first reaction. And that's because of these
two phenyl groups here. So this confirmation,
where we have our proton and our bromine antiperiplanar, this is definitely not the
most stable confirmation. All right, we have these
really bulky phenyl groups gauche to each other, and that means that this would be slower than the first reaction,
because this is the confirmation we must have for this mechanism to occur, but it's not a very stable confirmation. If we go back up here to the
first reaction that we did, when we had our proton
antiperiplanar to our bromine, our two phenyl groups
were anti to each other, so they're relatively
far away from each other. So this would be a stable confirmation. And so this reaction happens a lot faster than our second reaction. Finally, let's summarize the
two reactions that we've seen. So on the left, the
stereochemistry at this carbon with our methyl group coming out at us and our hydrogen going away from us, that gave us the E alkene as our product with our two phenyl
groups on opposite sides of the double bond. We changed the stereochemistry, so now the hydrogen's coming out at us and the methyl group
is going away from us. We got a different product. We got the Z alkene with
our two phenyl groups on the same side of our double bond. So that shows you how this
is a stereospecific reaction. The E2 mechanism means
that the stereochemistry of the substrate determines
the stereochemistry of the product.