If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Sn2 mechanism: kinetics and substrate

The mechanism, rate law, and stereochemistry of Sn2 reactions. How the sterics of the alkyl halide affect the reaction rate.  Created by Jay.

Want to join the conversation?

  • leaf green style avatar for user Vedant Kumar
    You're placing the oxygen on the same side as Br but you're saying that it's inversion. How come?
    Also, I really don't understand that triangle type bond, what's that?
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user claire wang
    at , why couldn't Br be the leaving group and Br leaves right away, leaving carbocation + to allow OH- to come attack the carbocation and it will be a SN1 reaction instead of SN2? i am having a bit of trouble drawing definitions between SN1 and SN2 :(
    (10 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • spunky sam blue style avatar for user Ernest Zinck
      The order of stability of carbocations is 3°>2°>1°. In this case, if you lose a Br-, you will get a 2° carbocation. This is so much less stable than a 3° cation that it forms too slowly to be of any synthetic use. Instead, the strong nucleophile OH- competes successfully in the much faster SN2 displacement reaction.
      The only secondary alkyl halides that react via SN1 reactions are benzylic and allylic halides, since their carbocations are stabilized by resonance.
      The general rule then is that:3° halides react via sN1, while 2° and 1° halides react via SN2.
      (21 votes)
  • leaf blue style avatar for user angeliki64
    1. I don't think that it is particularly relevant here, but C is also pulling electrons from the three H's attached. Doesn't that affect the partial positive charge of C at ?
    2. A rather general question: at Jay determines the absolute configuration. When do we have to determine the absolute configuration in dealing with reactions? At the first example in this video, we didn't consider the absolute configuration.
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • spunky sam blue style avatar for user Ernest Zinck
      1. Yes, it does. Every atom wants electrons, but some want electrons more than others. Cl wants them the most, so that puts a partial negative charge on Cl and a positive charge on C. H wants electrons almost as much as C, but C wants them just a little more. So the H atoms get a very small positive charge and that on the C atom gets reduced slightly, but it still stays partially positive.
      2. We can largely ignore the absolute configuration of a molecule when it reacts with achiral substances, except when we want to know the mechanism, as in this video. We absolutely must know the absolute configuration when it reacts with other chiral substances. For example, the amino acids in our bodies all have one particular configuration. The enzymes that interact with them must have the correct configuration in order to react.
      As another example of the importance of absolute configuration, the drug thalidomide used to be prescribed as a racemic mixture for the prevention of morning sickness in pregnant women. It was later found that only one configuration was an effective drug, but the other configuration caused severe birth defects. The drug had to be withdrawn from the market, but only after the birth of several severely malformed children.
      (8 votes)
  • male robot hal style avatar for user Dylan Valencia
    Why isn't the reaction of 2-bromobutane with NaOH an E2 reaction (the major product being an alkene rather than the enantiomer in the video)? I thought with secondary carbons, you need a weaker base, but still a good nucleophile for SN2 to be the major pathway. Or is he just showing us examples of SN2 reactions regardless of major or minor products?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • orange juice squid orange style avatar for user visitarjun2001
    Why is it that the bromine did not get removed first in the sn2 reactio, whereas it happened with the sn1 reaction?

    Thanks
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers sapling style avatar for user Elyssa Nicole Johannesen
    I thought that the tertiary carbon could not proceed by SN2, only SN1 due to hinderance by the connecting C atoms. What allows for the exception?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • duskpin sapling style avatar for user Soumya Tunga
    at , he says that doubling the concentration of alkyl halide, will double the rate. But this will make sense only if the OH- concentration is also increased. since both the reactants are needed to have the concerted reaction, if only reactants concentration is changed, even then the no. of interactions between the species will be determined by the reactant in lesser amount (OH-, in this case) i.e. depends on Limiting Reagent. PLs explain the concept.
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Andy.Ngu.Vu
    How can you say you always get inversion of configuration for Sn2? If the nucleophile that attacks happens to be ranked 4 instead of 1, then the absolute configuration would be unchanged.
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user DSet
      Sn2 only takes place at primary or secondary carbons. By that distinction, there will always be a hydrogen (or two) present at your electrophilic carbon, and all nucleophiles will be a higher priority than them (other than the Hydride ion [H-], but if you happened to see that undergo an Sn2 reaction the carbon would no longer be chiral). Also, generally, most nucleophiles you will see will be higher priority than the carbon substituents present. Sounds like you are connecting with the material well though, keep it up!
      (2 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Lisa Goldsworthy
    at 9.00 it says its R butanol but shouldn't the OH be coming from C2 counting from left to right?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • mr pants teal style avatar for user Kim
    At , when you double the concentration of the alkyl halide isn't the overall rate 3? so then doesn't that triple the overall reaction?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- [Instructor] Let's look at the mechanism for an SN2 reaction. On the left we have an alkyl halide and we know that this bromine is a little bit more electronegative than this carbon so the bromine withdraws some electron density away from that carbon which makes this carbon a little bit positive, so we say partially positive. That's the electrophilic center so this on the left is our electrophile. On the right, we know that this hydroxide ion which we could get from something like sodium hydroxide, is a negative one formal charge on the oxygen which makes it a good nucleophile. Let me write down here. This is our nucleophile on the right and on the left is our electrophile which I'm also gonna refer to as a substrate in this video. This alkyl halide is our substrate. We know from an earlier video that the nucleophile will attack the electrophile because opposite charges attract. This negative charge is attracted to this partially positive charge. Lone pair of electrons on the oxygen will attack this partially positive carbon. At the same time, the two electrons in this bond come off onto the bromine. Let me draw the bromine over here. The bromine had three lone pairs of electrons on it and it's gonna pick up another lone pair of electrons. Let me show those electrons in magenta. This bond breaks and these two electrons come off onto the bromine which gives the bromine a negative one formal charge. This is the bromide anion. And we're also forming a bond between the oxygen and this carbon and this bond comes from this lone pair of electrons which I've just marked in blue here. Those two electrons in blue form this bond and we get our product which is an alcohol. The SN2 mechanism is a concerted mechanism because the nucleophile attacks the electrophile, at the same time we get loss of a leaving groups. There's only one step in this mechanism. Let's say we did a series of experiments to determine the rate law for this reaction. Remember from general chemistry, rate laws are determined experimentally. Capital R is the rate of the reaction and that's equal to the rate constant k times the concentration of our alkyl halide. And it's determined experimentally this is to the first power times the concentration of the hydroxide ion also to the first power. So what does this mean? This means if we increased the concentration of our alkyl halide. If we increase the concentration of our alkyl halide by a factor of two, what happens to the rates of the reaction? Well, the rate of the reaction is proportional to the concentration of the alkyl halide to the first power. Two to the first is equal to two which means the overall rate of the reaction would increase by a factor of two. Doubling the concentration of your alkyl halide while keeping this concentration, the hydroxide ion concentration the same should double the rate of the reaction. And also, if we kept the concentration of alkyl halide the same and we double the concentration of hydroxide, that would also increase the rate by a factor of two. And this experimentally determined rate law makes sense with our mechanism. If we increase the concentration of the nucleophile or we increase the concentration of the electrophile, we increase the frequency of collisions between the two which increases the overall rate of the reaction. The fact that our rate law is proportional to the concentration of both the substrate and the nucleophile fits with our idea of a one step mechanism. Finally, let's take a look at where this SN2 comes from. We keep on saying an SN2 mechanism, an SN2 reaction. The S stands for substitution. Let me write in here substitution because our nucleophile is substituting for our leaving group. We can see in our final products here, the nucleophile has substituted for the leaving group. The N stands for nucleophilic because of course it is our nucleophile that is doing the substituting. And finally the two here refers to the fact that this is bimolecular which means that the rate depends on the concentration of two things. The substrate and the nucleophile. That's different from an SN1 mechanism where the rate is dependent only on the concentration of one thing. The rate of the reaction also depends on the structure of the alkyl halide, on the structure of the substrate. On the left we have a methyl halide followed by a primary alkyl halide. The carbon bonded to our bromine is directly attached to one alkyl group followed by a secondary alkyl halide, the carbon bonded to the bromine is bonded to two alkyl groups, followed by a tertiary alkyl halide. This carbon is bonded to three alkyl groups. Turns out that the methyl halides and the primary alkyl halide react the fastest in an SN2 mechanism. Secondary alkyl halides react very slowly and tertiary alkyl halides react so, so slowly that we say they are unreactive toward an SN2 mechanism. And this makes sense when we think about the mechanism because remember, the nucleophile has to attack the electrophile. The nucleophile needs to get close enough to the electrophilic carbon to actually form a bond and steric hindrance would prevent that from happening. Something like a tertiary alkyl halide has this big bulky methyl groups which prevent the nucleophile for attacking. Let's look at a video so we can see this a little bit more clearly. Here's our methyl halide with our carbon directly bonded to a halogen which I'm seeing as yellow. And here's our nucleophile which could be the hydroxide ion. The nucleophile approaches the electrophile for the side opposite of the leaving group and you can see with the methyl halide there's no steric hindrance. When we move to a primary alkyl halide, the carbon bonded to the halogen has only one alkyl group bonded to it, it's still easy for the nucleophile to approach. When we move to a secondary alkyl halide, so for a secondary you can see that the carbon bonded to the halogen has two methyl groups attached to it now. It gets a little harder for the nucleophile to approach in the proper orientation. These bulky methyl groups make it more difficult for the nucleophile to get close enough to that electrophilic carbon. When we go to a tertiary alkyl halide, so three alkyl groups. There's one, there's two and there's three. There's a lot more steric hindrance and it's even more difficult for our nucleophile to approach. As we saw on the video, for an SN2 reaction we need decreased steric hindrance. So, if we look at this alkyl halide, the carbon that is directly bonded to our halogen is attached to only one alkyl group. This is a primary alkyl halide and that makes this a good SN2 reaction. The decreased steric hindrance allows the nucleophile to attack the electrophile.