If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Stereotypes stereotype threat and self fulfilling prophecies

Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination are explored, showing how they impact social interactions. Stereotyping, a cognitive process, can lead to prejudice, an emotional response, and discrimination, a behavioral action. The video also discusses stereotype threat, where negative stereotypes can harm performance, and self-fulfilling prophecies, where initial stereotypes are reinforced over time. Created by Arshya Vahabzadeh.

Want to join the conversation?

  • blobby green style avatar for user Lo Gabs
    Can someone tell me the difference between stereotype threat and the self fulfilling prophecy? I seem to still not understand the distinction. Does stereotype threat have to do with one's own evaluation of their capabilities based on their in group, while self fulfilling prophecy has to do with interactions and perceptions by those around them?
    (7 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops tree style avatar for user Sonam
      There isn't a positive reinforcement necessarily in the case of stereotype threat, although there could be and then it would be a self-fulfilling prophecy. If girls are made to feel they are worse than boys at math, then perform worse on tests, that is stereotype threat. If a teacher takes this as evidence that girls are less competent after all, then it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. But if a teacher does not do that then it is only a stereotype threat because there was no positive reinforcement of the stereotype.
      (9 votes)
  • leaf green style avatar for user Sisay1
    I wonder if exposure of positive stereotype would have improved the exam score.
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops tree style avatar for user Sonam
      There was actually a study where researchers randomly drew names of students and told their teacher that according to their assessment these students were projected to do very well in school that year. Lo and behold, they did, and it was all due to the power of the teacher's expectation of them.
      (9 votes)
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user Ziming Lan
    What if the stereotype mentioned in the exam paper is something obviously false and everyone knows it's false. Would it still affect?

    For example before a physical fitness test, the theory component of the paper mentioned that typically boys runs slower than girls. Everyone know it's false, but would the boys ended up running slower as a result?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leafers sapling style avatar for user Randi Colbert
      I think it depends on the source of the information, and the age at which it's given. This is just my opinion, so take it for what you will, but if a particularly young man were told that by an influential teacher, it might have more impact on their performance. It might also take a long time of seeing otherwise to shake the idea that boys run slower than girls. Whereas if it were an offhanded remark by someone in their peer group, it would probably be brushed off.
      (3 votes)
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Hany Soliman
    Would stereotype threat be considered a sort of self-fulfilling theory?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers seed style avatar for user yuthehao
    Anyone else's were mind blown when he made the connection to self-fulfilling prophecy?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Arbaaz Ibrahim
    How is it a positive cycle, is'nt it a negative cycle?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Mustafa Shahbaz
    Whats the difference between racism and discrimination?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • sneak peak purple style avatar for user Nur
    At the instructor says that this is a positive feedback. Is it positive because it comes back on itself; what makes it positive? What is the difference between a positive and negative feedback?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • primosaur seed style avatar for user Diane Polyakov
      If the equation is A --> B then a positive feedback system is when the presence of B increases the conversion of A to B. B positively influences the equation to make more of itself. In a negative feedback system, the presence of B inhibits the conversion of A to B. B negatively influences the equation to make more of itself.

      In his example, it is a positive feedback system because the behavior of avoiding the city dwellers positively influences the persons beliefs that they are rude. The more he thinks they are rude, the more he avoids them, making him continue to think they are rude, and therefore continue to avoid them.
      (2 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user G-unit
    So if the stereotype is inherently pos/neg - then wouldn't the affective component naturally be included? Or, can a stereotype that's been stated without an affective component be interpreted w/ an affective component and in that case the person reading it and attaching the affective component has made a prejudice, not the original commenter?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user tian1di2 jax
    the narrator said 'city dwellers are rude-->i dont like them-->i will avoid them' an example of a self fulling prophecy which i suppose is negative
    if i think all people that wear glasses are smart and i like them and decide to have relationships with glasses wearing people, would this be negative self fulling prophecy as well?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- [Voiceover] Okay, so what do you think about people who wear glasses? I think people who wear glasses look incredibly intelligent. In fact, I think just wearing a pair of glasses can add 10 points to your IQ. What about people who live in cities? I find people who live in cities to be abrasive, to be rude, to be terribly impolite. What am I doing by making these comments? Well, what I'm doing is I am stereotyping, and what stereotyping means is that I'm attributing a certain thought, a certain cognition to a group of individuals. I'm overgeneralizing. And stereotyping doesn't just involve a pair of glasses, what people wear, or where they live, but it can also involve race, gender, culture, religion, even shoe size. So it can be pretty all-encompassing. Doesn't stereotyping have some disadvantages? Yeah, and it should be somewhat obvious. A major disadvantage is it's pretty inaccurate. On the other hand, does stereotyping have an advantage? The answer is yes. Stereotyping actually allows us to rapidly assess large amounts of social information. So in that regard, it's actually a useful tool, even though it does have its drawbacks. What I want to do now is to talk to you about a different concept, and this is again perhaps a negative characteristic of stereotyping and this is the concept of stereotype threat. Let's take two groups of students. One, the red students and two, the blue students, and these students are two equally capable group of students, and now let's make them sit an exam. How do they score? How do they test? In this situation, their scores are equal. They're the same. Both red and blue get the same score. Now let's do something else. Let's make them sit the exam, but this time let's expose the students to some negative stereotypes about the blue students not being good at exams, not being academic. But what happens now? Well, the red students score the same, but this time we notice the blue students take a hit in their performance. Their performance drops. Well, this is what we see as being a stereotype threat. This is when the exposure to a negative stereotype surrounding a task can actually cause a decrease in the performance of an individual when attempting that task. So here the stereotype actually threatens performance. Now since I've been talking about city folks, city dwellers being so rude, let's put that down here. So when we put that down here, what are we really thinking about? So this is a thought process or a cognition, and what we said before is when we think about cognitions we're actually stereotyping. So if I think city dwellers are rude, then I may say that, hmm, you know what? I don't like them, and you know what? If I don't like a group of people, I'm probably not going to spend a lot of time with them. I'm going to probably avoid them. Well, let's have a look at these two other statements. I don't like them. I'm attaching an affect, which is an emotion that can be positive or negative, to these city dwellers. So now there is an affective component to this, and when we have an affective component, we move from stereotyping to prejudice, and then moving from the affective component we start to avoid them. What happens there? When we avoid them we are actually demonstrating a behavioral component, and when we demonstrate a behavioral component, we're actually moving from prejudice to discrimination. So as we can see here, the difference between stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination is one of cognition, affect, and behavior. Well, let's go back to these city dwellers. If I avoid them, what do you think's going to happen then? Well, you know what, let's take their viewpoint. If I avoid them, maybe they're going to start thinking that I am rude. So notice that may become their cognition now, and then if they think I am rude, they might not like me, and if they don't like me, they may try to avoid me, and if they avoid me, then I may start to think that they're rude. This actually feeds back here. This positively feeds back on itself, and suddenly we have this circle that can continuously feed back on itself, and notice that they have done the same things that I did to them. The cognition, in that they think I am rude, an affective component, in that they may start to not like me, and a behavioral component, in which they start to avoid me. Well, what are we actually seeing here? Well, what we're seeing is the development of a self-fulfilling prophecy, and that's to say that our initial thought or cognition, that city dwellers are rude, becomes more true and more affirmed over time, either directly or indirectly, because of our own actions. To us, our initial stereotype that city dwellers are rude becomes more true as we perceive them to be ruder and ruder over time in response to our own behavior. This is the positive feedback that we see in a self-fulfilling prophecy.