If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Evaluating the argument

Should There Be Lifelong or Permanent Punishments? Evaluate and discuss the argument presented in this video.
Consider the following opinions regarding the collateral consequences of incarceration faced by released offenders:
  1. People who engage in criminal activity undermine their moral worth and deserve to face collateral consequences even after being released from prison.
  2. It’s unfortunate that offenders face collateral consequences, and we should try to limit their impact; but given that the return of offenders into society creates risks and burdens, it’s only fair that these burdens fall on the offenders themselves rather than on law-abiding citizens.
  3. Collateral consequences are barriers to successful reintegration and a leading cause of social problems that affect the offenders, their families, and their communities. For the good of society, we must eliminate collateral consequences.
  4. Offenders who have finished serving their official prison sentence have fully paid their debt to society and deserve to be returned to full moral status—and this includes not subjecting them to collateral consequences.
Now, take some time - by yourself or with others - to reflect openly yet critically on this issue. Where do you stand, and why?

Want to join the conversation?

  • blobby green style avatar for user olamihoma9
    Rdyfjvou just 8th 6th and then we are in providing productive work to 8K6 and we are not a good person 😒 we can be there to ensure that 😀 and efficient will be a question of the company’s of physical stamina in a variety of experience and in a question wrongly the company’s objectives of physical stamina can I be the same way 😀
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user